FREE WHITEWATER

Author Archive for JOHN ADAMS

Daily Bread for 12.5.14

Good morning, Whitewater.

We’ll have a mostly cloudy but mild day for Whitewater’s 6 PM Christmas Parade of Lights (with pre-parade events beginning at 5 PM in our downtown).

The parade route runs from the intersection of Whiton & Main to Whitewater Street near Cravath and by the SweetSpot. Map below from DTWW (clicking the image produces a larger map):

Whitewater's 2014 Christmas Parade of Lights

On this day in 1933, America repeals Prohibition:

The repeal movement was initiated and financed by the Association Against the Prohibition Amendment, who worked to elect Congressmen who agreed to support repeal. The group’s wealthy supporters included John D. Rockefeller, Jr., S. S. Kresge, and the Du Pont family, among others, who had abandoned the dry cause.[24] Pauline Sabin, a wealthy Republican who founded the Women’s Organization for National Prohibition Reform (WONPR), argued that Prohibition should be repealed because it made the United States a nation of hypocrites and undermined its respect for the rule of law. This hypocrisy and the fact that women had initially led the prohibition movement convinced Sabin to establish the WNPR. Their efforts eventually led to the repeal of prohibition.[31][32]

When Sabin’s fellow Republicans would not support her efforts, she went to the Democrats, who switched their support of the dry cause to endorse repeal under the leadership of liberal politicians such as Fiorello La Guardia and Franklin D. Roosevelt. Sabin and her supporters emphasized that repeal would generate enormous sums of much-needed tax revenue, and weaken the base of organized crime.[citation needed]

Repeal of Prohibition was accomplished with the ratification of the Twenty-first Amendment on December 5, 1933. Under its terms, states were allowed to set their own laws for the control of alcohol. Following repeal, public interest in an organized prohibition movement dwindled. However, it survived for a while in a few southern and border states.[31][32] To this day, however, there are still counties and parishes within the US known as “dry”, where the sale of liquor (whiskey, wine) -not beer- is prohibited; several such municipalities have adopted liquor-by-the-drink, however in order to expand tax revenue.[33]

On this day in 1879, Wisconsin gets an animal-protection society:

1879 – Humane Society of Wisconsin Organized
On this date the Humane Society of Wisconsin was organized in Milwaukee. Inspired by Henry Bergh, a New York City philanthropist, and his Humane Movement, the state Humane Society was formed to protect both animals and children. However, with the formation of child protection laws in the early 1900s, the Humane Society of Wisconsin began to focus primarily on animal protection. [Source: Humane Society of Wisconsin]

Google-a-Day aska a question on literature:

What traffic circle with a “square” name is located just south of the site where the author lived while writing “The Seven Pillars”?

WEDC: Those Who Can’t Do, Lobby

One of the Wisconsin Economic Development Corporation’s many incompetent leaders, Ryan Murray, is leaving behind his controversial, failed role at the WEDC to become a lobbyist

Jobs agency official becomes lobbyist @ JS All Politics Blog reports on Murray’s shabby move:

The No. 2 official at the state’s jobs agency has left the agency to join a lobbying firm.

Ryan Murray, a top lieutenant of GOP Gov. Scott Walker, stepped down recently as the chief operating officer of the Wisconsin Economic Development Corp.

Murray, a former deputy chief of staff to Walker, is becoming a partner at The Firm Consulting, which lobbies for top companies such as AT&T and Cessna Aircraft as well as some businesses aligned with startup companies such as gener8tor LLC.

Just about everything that could have gone wrong with the WEDC – an organization dedicated to insiders’ enrichment of a few at the expense of everyone else – has gone wrong. 

See, a link to other posts about the WEDC @ FREE WHITEWATER. 

‘Wastewater Facility Poised for Upgrades: Memo 4’

Over at the City of Whitewater’s website, there is an announcement entitled, Wastewater Facility Poised for Upgrades  (http://www.whitewater-wi.gov/residents/recent-news/2803-wastewater-facility-poised-for-upgrades).  

Among several memos about these upgrades, one finds Memo 4 – Digestion Complex and Energy Production.

The text of that memo (embedded below) is brief:

Technical Memorandum #4 – Digestion Complex and Energy Production – In Progress.

It’s been over a year, so it’s fair to ask: When can Whitewater’s residents expect an update on the status of this ‘in progress’ Digestion Complex proposal?

Following an orderly method for blogging on topics, I’ll send along an email to City Manager Clapper asking this question.  I’ll post an update with any information received in reply, should there be a reply.  

See, Technical Memorandum #4 – Digestion Complex and Energy Production:

Daily Bread for 12.4.14

Good morning, Whitewater.

Thursday in Whitewater will be cloudy in the morning giving way to sunshine in the afternoon, with a high of thirty-four. Sunrise is 7:09 AM and sunset 4:21 PM, for 9h 11m 24s of daytime. The moon is a waxing gibbous with 95.5% of its visible disk illuminated.

Whitewater’s Landmarks Commission meets tonight at 6 PM.

On this day in 1780, America successfully tricks Britain during the Revolutionary War:

A force of Continental dragoons commanded by Colonel William Washington — General George Washington’s second cousin once removed — corners Loyalist Colonel Rowland Rugeley and his followers in Rugeley’s house and barn near Camden, South Carolina, on this day in 1780.

After nearly a year of brutal backcountry conflict between Washington and the fierce British commander Lieutenant Colonel Banastre Tarleton (who was infamous for Tarleton’s Quarter, the murder of colonial POWs on May 29, 1780 at Waxhaws), Washington had retreated to North Carolina the previous October. Commanded to return to the South Carolina theater by Brigadier General Daniel The Old Wagoner Morgan, Colonel Washington still lacked the proper artillery to dislodge the Loyalists. He told his cavalrymen to dismount and surround the barn. While out of Rugeley’s sight, Washington’s men fabricated a pine log to resemble a cannon.

This Quaker gun trick, named so because Quakers used it to be intimidating without breaching their pacifist vow of non-violence, worked beautifully. Washington faced the cannon toward the buildings in which the Loyalists had barricaded themselves and threatened bombardment if they did not surrender. Shortly after, Rugeley surrendered his entire force without a single shot being fired.

When informed of the pacifist victory, General Charles Cornwallis, commander of the British armies in America, informed Tarleton that Rugeley’s performance ensured he would never rise to the rank of brigadier. A few weeks later, Tarleton would himself face an even worse humiliation at the hands of General Morgan during the devastating Battle of Cowpens. The harrowing civil war for the hearts and minds of the Carolina backcountry had finally begun to favor the Patriots.

On this day in 1933, Janesville remains defiant:

1933 – Janesville Council Denies Prohibition End
On this date the Janesville Council drafted a “drastic liquor control law” that prohibited serving liquor. The law prohibited distilled spirits, but not beer, at bars, and limited liquor service to tables. Backrooms and “blinds” (closed booths) were also prohibited. The only place where packaged liquor was allowed to be sold was at municipal dispensaries. Further, bars were prohibited from selling packaged liquor. The next day, the city was uncommonly quiet as the 18th Amendment was repealed. For nearly 14 years, the 18th Amendment (the Prohibition Amendment), outlawed the manufacture, transportation, and sale of alcoholic beverages within the U.S. [Source: Janesville Gazette, December 5, 1933, p.1]]

Google-a-Day asks a question of geography and history:

In the Russian monument of the founder of Moscow, which hand is he holding out to the side?

One Year On 

Some ideas, good or bad, are worth remarking on promptly.  

Some, but not all: there are times when a proposal is so destructive of a community’s well-being, so terribly misguided, that a few remarks, or even many, would not be enough.  

In those times, one meets a light, misplaced enthusiasm with diligent, well-placed work.

It was one year ago to this day, on December 3, 2013 at around 8 PM, that Whitewater’s Wastewater Superintendent cheerily broached another ignorant & destructive plan for a waste digester in Whitewater.   

The idea, simply put, would be to make Whitewater the repository for other communities’ human and animal waste, and all manner of filth that could be trucked from cities that didn’t want it, to be delivered to our small, residential town.  

I’ve written about it only briefly since.  Better to spend the year in preparation, it seemed, than commentary.  And so, that’s what I’ve done.  For much of the last year, this has been my effort from this particular vantage: to research and to prepare for this subject.

Along the way, I’ve written a few posts that describe how the long work yet ahead seems to me, and thought of earlier posts that reminded me to work still harder.
 
In the end, one begins each day from The Better Approach of the Dark-Horse Underdog, recognizes that sugary promises contribute to Local Government’s Vendor Problem, that one can profit by Frédéric Bastiat’s Gift to Whitewater, believing that grandiose ideas deserve more scrutiny than The Peddler’s Egg, that Public Choice Theory Inoculates People from Poor Policy, and that there should be six clear and defined Steps for Blogging on a Policy or Proposal.  
   
In all this, I am convinced yet again that the right standards for Whitewater eclipse giddy cheerleading.  

It’s been a year well and truly spent.  

For all the preparation, steady and thorough, I’ve also felt a deepening love and hope for our small and beautiful city, convinced as I am that a New Whitewater is inevitable, that there will be no going back.

One would prefer not to contend over this; far more, one would betray oneself, and all one believes, not to contend in opposition.        

One year on, a decade, or even a generation from now: a few dark proposals require a diligent, zealous opposition whenever they should appear, to the very fullest of one’s ability.  

Daily Bread for 12.3.14

Good morning, Whitewater.

Midweek in Whitewater will be sunny with a high of thirty-two. Sunrise is 7:08 AM and sunset 4:21 PM for 9h 12m 35s of daytime. The moon is a waxing gibbous with ninety percent of its visible disk illuminated.

On this day in 1776, Gen. Washington reaches the banks of the Delaware River, directing his army to cross into Pennsylvania. He arrives at a time, just half a year beyond the Declaration, when Patriot fortunes seem at their lowest:

In a letter dated December 3, 1776, General George Washington writes to Congress from his headquarters in Trenton, New Jersey, to report that he had transported much of the Continental Army’s stores and baggage across the Delaware River to Pennsylvania.

In his letter Washington wrote, ‘Immediately on my arrival here, I ordered the removal of all the military and other stores and baggage over the Delaware, a great quantity are already got over, and as soon as the boats come up from Philadelphia, we shall load them, by which means I hope to have every thing secured this night and tomorrow if we are not disturbed.’

Washington then made the critical strategic move of confiscating and burning all the boats along the Delaware to prevent British troops from pursuing his beleaguered forces across the river. The British strategy of chasing Washington across New Jersey, rather than capturing his entire army in Manhattan, seemed to be a stroke of genius. As New Jersey was devastated at the hands of British forces and Washington’s men cowered in Pennsylvania, even staunch Patriots, including Thomas Jefferson, considered surrender to the crown.

Also on this day, General Washington received a letter dated November 30 from his second-in-command, General Charles Lee, reporting that he was about to cross into New York near Peekskill on this day in 1776. In an apt reflection of the state of the American fortunes, the British captured General Lee nine days later in New Jersey. Richard Stockton, a leading New Jersey patriot and signer of the Declaration of Independence, was also in British custody and was forced to swear an oath of allegiance to the British king along with thousands of his New Jersey neighbors.

On this day in 1947, Wisconsin gets a new medium:

1947 – First TV Station in Wisconsin Established
On this date the first TV station in Wisconsin, WTMJ-TV in Milwaukee, was established. The seventeenth television station in the country, WTMJ-TV was the first in the Midwest. [Source: University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee Libraries]

Google-a-Day asks a sports question:

What British Queen watched and promoted a lacrosse game in 1867?

Public Choice Theory Inoculates People from Poor Policy

In places big and small, one of the many questions for residents is this: is holding government office, whether elected or appointed, a more virtuous way of life than private activity? 

If it should prove more virtuous, then one can reasonably contend that long-tenured government officials are, themselves, more virtuous than private citizens.

One could think of this as the theory of the noble Romans, as tribunes of the people, as selfless defenders of all.

This idea of government office as an especially noble calling is false: human nature does not change when a man or woman enters public office.  People are self-interested by nature, and this nature does not change when one sits behind a government desk. 

Of public and private, one is neither better nor worse than the other.  It’s the insistence that public life is a better way that presents countless problems for society.  There’s as much virtue in being a baker as there is in being governor.

It’s impossible, truly, to read early (and foundational) American political theory without seeing that the Founders understood that self-interest afflicts all, including government officials.

Needless to say, ceaselessly insisting that government work is noble work, as though government officials were contemplative monks in a monastery, gives government officials two false (but useful) claims to make against critics:

1.  That they should necessarily be given particular deference in society over private citizens, and

2.  That their ideas and plans should necessarily be given particular deference over private citizens’ ideas or assessments.

Neither claim is true, but they work a certain magic on the impressionable or insecure, rendering men and women who should live well and reasonably into mere subjects who live poorly and under a false impression.  

Public choice theory cures people of the false impression that a few government men are better than others, teaching correctly that human nature is the same among those in public or private life.

(This is, of course, a simplification of that theory, yet an accurate description of one of its key tenets.)

In the same way, the strength of human reasoning, and tools of analysis, are equally available to all, whether publicly or privately situated.  That a public man proposes a plan does not render the plan immune to the principles of reasoning available to private criticism.

The surest policies, to the extent anything is sure, come from officials who present simply and plainly, without grand claims or giddy anticipation, recognizing that useful assessments and critiques may come from any corner, including the many private residents within a community.  

For more about Public Choice Theory, see Key Insights of Public Choice Thinking @ the Cato Institute.

Posted at Daily Adams and FREE WHITEWATER

Daily Bread for 12.2.14

Good morning, Whitewater.

Tuesday in town will be partly cloudy with a high of thirty-two. Sunrise is 7:07 AM and sunset 4:21 PM, for 9h 13m 51s of daytime. The moon is a waxing gibbous with 82.2% of its visible disk illuminated.

We’ve a series of public meetings in the city today. At 6 PM, the Planning Commission will meet, at 6:10 PM the Alcohol and Licensing Commission meets, and at 6:30 PM Common Council meets in joint session with the Planning Commission.

On this day in 1804, France gets what no one needs, an emperor:

The coronation of Napoleon as Emperor of the French, which took place on Sunday December 2, 1804 (11 Frimaire, Year XIII according to the French Republican Calendar), at Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris, has been said to mark “the instantiation of modern empire”, representing a “transparently masterminded piece of modern propaganda”.[1] On May 18, 1804, the Sénat conservateur vested the Republican government in an Emperor, and preparations for a coronation followed. Napoleon’s elevation to Emperor was overwhelmingly approved by the French citizens in a referendum. Among Napoleon’s motivations for being crowned were to gain prestige in international royalist and Catholic milieux and to lay the foundation for a future dynasty.[2]:243

In the classical French tradition, kings underwent a ceremony of consecration (sacre) rather than a coronation; in consecration, anointment was conferred by the archbishop of Reims in Notre-Dame de Reims.[2] Napoleon blended Roman imperial pageantry with the purported memory of Charlemagne. The coronation was held in Paris in the presence of Pope Pius VII. According to government tallies, the entire cost was over 8.5 million francs…..

In Wisconsin history, a Wisconsin’s U.S. Senator Joseph McCarthy is disgraced:

After two months of hearings and deliberations, the Watkins Committee recommended that McCarthy be censured on two of the 46 counts: his contempt of the Subcommittee on Rules and Administration, which had called him to testify in 1951 and 1952, and his abuse of General Zwicker in 1954. The Zwicker count was dropped by the full Senate on the grounds that McCarthy’s conduct was arguably “induced” by Zwicker’s own behavior. In place of this count, a new one was drafted regarding McCarthy’s statements about the Watkins Committee itself.[110]

The two counts on which the Senate ultimately voted were:

  • That McCarthy had “failed to cooperate with the Subcommittee on Rules and Administration”, and “repeatedly abused the members who were trying to carry out assigned duties …”
  • That McCarthy had charged “three members of the [Watkins] Select Committee with ‘deliberate deception’ and ‘fraud’ … that the special Senate session … was a ‘lynch party'”, and had characterized the committee “as the ‘unwitting handmaiden’, ‘involuntary agent’ and ‘attorneys in fact’ of the Communist Party”, and had “acted contrary to senatorial ethics and tended to bring the Senate into dishonor and disrepute, to obstruct the constitutional processes of the Senate, and to impair its dignity”.[111]
  • On December 2, 1954, the Senate voted to “condemn” McCarthy on both counts by a vote of 67 to 22.[112] The Democrats present unanimously favored condemnation and the Republicans were split evenly. The only senator not on record was John F. Kennedy, who was hospitalized for back surgery; Kennedy never indicated how he would have voted.[113] Immediately after the vote, Senator H. Styles Bridges, a McCarthy supporter, argued that the resolution was “not a censure resolution” because the word “condemn” rather than “censure” was used in the final draft. The word “censure” was then removed from the title of the resolution, though it is generally regarded and referred to as a censure of McCarthy, both by historians[114] and in Senate documents.[115] McCarthy himself said, “I wouldn’t exactly call it a vote of confidence.” He added, “I don’t feel I’ve been lynched.”[116]

    Google-a-Day poses a sports question:

    The longest tennis match in history was played over three days and included how many strokes by the American born player?

    Adorable Baby Bats

    Here’s an explanation accompanying the YouTube video of how these bats came to be ‘baby bat burritos’ —

    Published on Nov 27, 2014
    These little flying foxes are new arrivals to the Australian Bat Clinic after an extreme heat event separated them from their mothers. 

    Learn more about the bat clinic here:
    www.australianbatclinic.com.au
    https://www.facebook.com/pages/Australian-Bat-Clinic-Wildlife-Trauma-Centre/242483795809816

    MEDIA: Images available for download on dropbox https://www.dropbox.com/sh/2nrjsxpkkmwe438/AACCufyrXexAFzgnCocgDlUqa?dl=0

    Subscribe to Wakaleo: http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCmqLYV9TlG4L-F4bVWJQyDw?sub_confirmation=1

    Flying fox colonies are under pressure in Australia due to loss of habitat, a negative public perception and extreme heat events that have wiped out entire colonies. The Australian Bat Clinic and many other wildlife groups in eastern Australia are currently inundated with baby bats that have been rescued following the latest tragedy which saw thousands of bats lose their lives due to the heat. 

    When a bat mother dies, often their young are still attached and will not survive without the right care. Bat carers play a vital role in not only retrieving suffering bats, but rehabilitating them until they can be released back into the wild. 
    When baby bats first enter rehabilitation it can be traumatising for them as they have just been separated from their mothers to which they have formed strong bonds. Bat carers have to ensure that the baby bats not only are well fed, but that they are nurtured and feel safe in their temporary new home. Providing affection to the bats is a necessity. 

    The teats represent their mother’s nipple, and this makes them feel more comfortable, as does the security of the blankets which they are often snugly wrapped in. 

    The bats will remain at the Australian Bat Clinic until they are old enough to be released. 

    If you love bats, consider donating! The Australian Bat Clinic spends a small fortune on food, laundry and medical equipment to keep these animals alive. Can you help? http://australianbatclinic.com.au/?page_id=188

    Remember, only registered bat carers should ever touch bats. If you see a bat in trouble, call an expert or dial 1800 ANIMAL (Australia)

    Wakaleo is on Facebook & Twitter! Come and say hello!
    https://www.facebook.com/WakaleoAnimalChannel?ref=hl
    https://twitter.com/Wakaleo_Channel

    Want more vids from WAKALEO? Support us on Patreon!
    http://www.patreon.com/wakaleo

    Music: ‘warm summer’ by pinkzebra

    The Peddler’s Egg

    image

    A peddler visits a local town, and announces that he has a Fabergé egg to sell. Townspeople gather near his freshly-painted cart to see the shiny jewel.  The seller contends his merchandise is the Rose Trellis Fabergé egg. 

    He extols the beauty of the object, tells listeners that he recently purchased it from a museum, and that he’s willing to sell it to the highest local bidder. 

    “How much is this egg?” they ask. 

    “Why, it’s a bargain at twenty-five million,” the peddler replies.  He tells the crowd, accurately, that Fabergé eggs have gone for even more than his asking price. 

    “Let’s see it,” says the crowd. 

    The peddler reaches into his cart, and grabs a silk bag, in which there’s a velvet box.  He opens the box, and briefly lifts up a small, glistening object. 

    “Behold,” he exclaims, “a world-renowned jewel that – for the right price – can be yours!”

    He holds it in his hand for just a few seconds, and hurriedly returns the egg to the velvet box, inside the silk bag. 

    Someone asks if she can see it again, for a longer time, and closely enough to hold it in her hand. 

    The peddler laughs at her request. 

    He loudly tells the assembly that “a real connoisseur wouldn’t need to hold a jewel of this quality, or inspect it.  Genuine experts know true value from a distance, after a quick glance of no more than three seconds.”

    “It’s too bad that you have people around here who are so troublesome that they think they should hold a multi-million-dollar object in their hands, or look at it closely, before buying,” declares the peddler.

    The seller’s declaration silences some, lest they appear unsophisticated in the peddler’s eyes.  The same statement emboldens others, causing them concern that three seconds from a distance is not a proper opportunity for inspection of an expensive object. 

    One is left with this question: Should a sober-minded person purchase that object, for anything like that asking price, under those conditions

    There’s a reasonable answer: Knowing nothing else of art, still one should know that a legitimate seller of genuine goods would not offer so precious a creation with so little time and such limited conditions for inspection.

    It would be better to reject entirely a peddler who’d make that sort of offer. Better, even, as he whines and wails on his way out of town.