Good morning.

Wednesday in Whitewater will be cloudy with a high of 65. Sunrise is 5:50 and sunset is 7:54, for 14 hours, 5 minutes of daytime. The moon is a waxing crescent with 11 percent of its visible disk illuminated.
On this day in 1803, American representatives sign a treaty to purchase the Louisiana Territory from France for $15 million, more than doubling the size of the young nation.
Update, Wednesday morning: I’ll have more about this evolving topic for tomorrow’s post.
The sensible forum for a discussion about Whitewater is Whitewater. In this way, the sensible forum for a discussion of the role of a school resource officer for the Whitewater Unified School District is within Whitewater. Our goal should be to adopt the best practices of any community, discussed openly and applied, within this community.
For many years, the Whitewater Unified School District has had a school resource officer drawn from the ranks of the Whitewater Police Department. The SRO contract between the school district and city is due for renewal this summer.
In a letter dated 4.9.25, outgoing Superintendent Caroline Pate-Hefty raised concerns about police services to the district. At its 4.15.25 meeting, the Whitewater Common Council supported (1) an extension of the current agreement for 120 days to give time for a new superintendent to discuss the agreement with the city and (2) requested that the city’s proposed extension be included in the school district’s next agenda packet.
Whitewater’s Police Chief Dan Meyer followed this council action with a 4.17.25 letter to the WUSD board outlining the city’s position. In reply to an email from the district’s board secretary, the city’s chief of staff repeated the city’s request for an extension to be added to the school board’s next meeting.
The extension that the city and the city’s police chief requested was not added to the school board’s open-session 4.28.25 agenda. There was no reason not to include the city’s extension requests in the board’s agenda packet for open-session consideration. Instead, the school board voted to put the school resource officer position to bid to communities in the area.
This was both a rash and impractical decision. The Whitewater Unified School District and the City of Whitewater have, as the names of both reveal, a community in common. The Whitewater Common Council was owed inclusion of its request as a matter of open government, of good faith discussion within this community, and, plainly, of simple courtesy.
If there are concerns to be addressed, those concerns should be addressed first in this community. An extension of the existing contract would give time for this community to hear and respond to those concerns. Submitting the school resource officer position to a bid cuts short that discussion. (It most certainly has this effect, too: rejecting an extension is turning away from the incumbent department, placing it in a lower position than it now occupies. There’s a difference between holding a spot and having to reapply for it.)
This libertarian blogger offers today no position on the right contract provisions for an SRO for Whitewater’s schools. It’s enough to know that the decision deserves more intra-community deliberation than the 4.28.25 school board action allows.
Whitewater’s schools should not be so quick to turn away from Whitewater.1
An extension of the current agreement for a 120-day period is the most reasonable choice for the community, and it is one that the board should promptly adopt.
_____
- I don’t believe I’ve ever suggested that Whitewater could be made better by contracting away from Whitewater. We should be trying to do better here in Whitewater. ↩︎
Massachusetts residents take woodpecker invasion in stride: