Good morning.
Tuesday in Whitewater will see a mix of rain or snow showers during the day, a high of thirty-seven, and snow in the evening. Sunrise is 6:31 AM and sunset 7:23 PM, for 12h 52m 18s of daytime. The moon is a waning gibbous with 89.6% of its visible disk illuminated. Today is the {tooltip}five hundred ninth day.{end-texte}Days since Trump’s election, with 11.9.16 as the first day.{end-tooltip}
On this day in 1860, the first Westbound Pony Express trip left St. Joseph, Missouri on April 3, 1860 and arrived ten days later in Sacramento, California, on April 14th.
On this day in 1865, Union soldiers take the Confederate capital:
When Petersburg, Virginia, fell on the night of April 2, 1865, Confederate leaders hastily abandoned Richmond. The 5th, 6th, 7th, 19th, 36th, 37th and 38th Wisconsin Infantry participated in the occupation of Petersburg and Richmond. The brigade containing the 19th Wisconsin Infantry was the first to enter Richmond on the morning of April 3rd. Their regimental flag became the first to fly over the captured capital of the Confederacy when Colonel Samuel Vaughn planted it on Richmond City Hall.
Recommended for reading in full —
➤ Deadspin shows How America’s largest local TV owner turned its news anchors into soldiers in Trump’s war on the media:
How America’s largest local TV owner turned its news anchors into soldiers in Trump’s war on the media: https://t.co/iLVtKRQycL pic.twitter.com/dMdSGellH3
— Deadspin (@Deadspin) March 31, 2018
➤ Madison’s WMSN decided to resist:
In response to the Sinclair message aired: “WMSN/FOX47 Madison did not air the Sinclair promotional announcement during our 9pm news this weekend. Rather, we stayed true to our commitment to provide our Madison area viewers local news, weather and sports of interest to them.” pic.twitter.com/MdQ568cWrH
— FOX 47 Madison (@fox47madison) April 2, 2018
(Whatever the consequences, they’ve made the right decision.)
➤ Kriston Capps considers Mapping the Threat of a Census Disaster in 2020 (“The GOP seems to be betting that damage from a major undercount will be isolated to Democratic-leaning cities. But it’s not that simple”):
At least a dozen states plan to sue the Trump administration over its decision to add a citizenship question to the 2020 Census, with the attorneys general of New York and California—populous states with large immigrant populations—leading the charge. But the damage of a potential undercount won’t be confined to the coasts.
Before Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross announced the citizenship question on Tuesday, the Democratic co-chair of the House Census Caucus had already proposed a bill to block last-minute census interference. Democrats in the Senate introduced mirror legislation to ensure that any changes to the census were properly tested before a survey. Another House Democrat from New York floated the possibility of withholding appropriations for the census.
While it’s Democrats who are erupting now, tracking populations that are hard for the census to reach reveals that the damage from an undercount could disrupt conservative-leaning states, too. Counties in Texas and Oklahoma, for example, contain some of the hardest-to-reach populations in the country, according to a mapping tool developed by the Center for Urban Research at the Graduate Center of the City University of New York in collaboration with the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights. A major census undercount could jeopardize new congressional seat pick-ups anticipated by Texas, Arizona, North Carolina, and other states that have traditionally trended GOP.
(See also Trump’s Census policy could boomerang and hurt red states as well as blue states.)
➤ Nick Miroff reports Trump administration, seeking to speed deportations, to impose quotas on immigration judges:
The Trump administration will pressure U.S. immigration judges to process cases faster by establishing a quota system tied to their annual performance reviews, according to new Justice Department directives.
The judges will be expected to clear at least 700 cases a year to receive a “satisfactory” performance rating, a standard that their union called an “unprecedented” step that risks undermining judicial independence and opens the courts to potential challenges.
…
Judge A. Ashley Tabaddor, president of the National Association of Immigration Judges, said the quota system could introduce an “appealable” issue and invite legal challenges.
“It could call into question the integrity and impartiality of the court if a judge’s decision is influenced by factors outside the facts of the case, or if motions are denied out of a judge’s concern about keeping his or her job,” Tabaddor said.
“We don’t know of any other court whose judges are subject to individual quotas and deadlines as part of performance reviews and evaluations,” she said.
(There seems not a single institution Trumpism doesn’t twist.)
➤ Robotic Fish Could Revolutionize How We Study The Ocean:
Have you thought much about Facebook?
I’m not on Facebook, cementing my curmudgeon cred. I don’t have any grand-kids to keep up with, so it isn’t all that painful for me. I am a bit of a rarity in my age group, as almost 70% of my peers are on Facebook. That is almost as many as take blood-thinners!
Matt Taibbi, of Rolling Stone, has written a perceptive essay about Facebook. It’s long, but illuminating:
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/taibbi-facebook-can-we-be-saved-social-media-giant-w518655
Facebook has a current market capitalization of $463B. That puts them at sixth largest in the US and more than Microsoft, Walmart, and General Motors, to name but a few. They got that big by giving away their product…Social interaction. Of course, that isn’t their product…Users are.
Facebook knows its users better than their mothers do. Facebook saves everything you ever sent to them, sorts it, and sells that info for micro-targeting of ads. If you are on Facebook and want to know just what Zuck remembers about you, here is how to find out:
http://americablog.com/2018/03/facebook-knows-what-doctors-i-go-to.html
You’ll be appalled…
Facebook also saves all that your friends send them, too, and uses that info to figure out just about anything about you. The micro-targeted ads may actually be useful, but there is something far more insidious going on when it comes to micro-targeting information and news to you. Every “like” you click is another data point for you to get more stuff like you just liked. If you believe that Trump is the risen savior, you will get lots of reinforcing “news” to cement your already expressed proclivities, and not much to refute it. Facebook is a major driver of the phenomenon of viral, crazy, shit becoming embedded in our political system.
Trump, and Putin, have exploited Facebook to likely throw a US election. That is serious stuff…
On Facebook — my limited experience over the years with it has been unexciting. I know many users love it, but I prefer my own site, with my own provider, where I’m the publisher. I do like Twitter, but for reading (news, comments on the news from reporters, etc.), and not as much for tweeting. The value of Twitter, though, at 140 or (now) 280 characters is that it forces concision.
Thanks for the Matt Taibbi story – I did not know half of what he’s written. I’ll link to it tomorrow.
For what Facebook knows about others, I’m stunned (from the John Aravosis post). Honest to goodness. In any case, the article I linked to from Ifeoma Ajunwa about Facebook (Facebook users aren’t the reason Facebook is in trouble now) holds up: they owe their users more than a hazy description of data use, and more than an easily exploited-platform. (Twitter has some of these problems, too, of course.)
About throwing an election, here’s a story I saw today (with a link to the underlying study): A new study suggests fake news might have won Donald Trump the 2016 election. (I have not yet has a chance to ready the study.)
One might have guessed as much – close race, very close in a few states that gave minority-vote Trump his win, obvious efforts of some to spread lies about Clinton, etc., but it’s a worthy effort to confirm the truth through sound methods.