Yesterday I posted a story about a restaurateur who was ending tipping at his establishments, because he thought this more equitable to all his employees:
Under the current gratuity system, not everyone at a restaurant is getting a fair shake. Waiters at full-service New York restaurants can expect a full 20 percent tip on most checks, for a yearly income of $40,000 or more on average — some of the city’s top servers easily clear $100,000 annually. But the problem isn’t what waiters make, it’s what cooks make. A mid-level line cook, even in a high-end kitchen, doesn’t have generous patrons padding her paycheck, and as such is, on average, unlikely to make much more than $35,000 a year.
The fact that the people cooking your food often earn less than the people who serve it is a troublesome issue not just for the cooks themselves, but also for their employers — especially in a high cost-of-living city. “We’ve never faced a shortage of talented cooks like we have this year,” Meyer told me. “We’re in a day and age where there are more talented cooks than there ever have been, but fewer of them who want to live in New York to start a fine dining career.”
Whatever your own reasons for voting, would you vote to keep or end tipping at restaurants?
Call me Old School: I like to be able to reward good performance with a very generous tip; and to leave a small tip for underperformance.
Easier not worrying about tipping.
Pay and go!
tipping gives more options to express an opinion on the meal plus service