FREE WHITEWATER

Reporting on Whitewater’s Water

When it takes years for a homeowner to learn of a problem, one can expect that when she does, she will be both frustrated and suspicious for the delay.

There are two published newspaper stories, from nearby newspapers, that recount the concerns of a Whitewater resident about environmental contamination from a now-defunct gas station. The Daily Jefferson County Union and the Janesville Gazette both have stories online. See, Whitewater woman worried about property contamination and Whitewater city officials say drinking water is safe.

Quick notes: I have no personal connection to anyone in these stories, and I have no expertise in the kind of environmental contamination described here, in this instance from benzene, a known carcinogen.

The homeowner believes both drinking water and ground contamination are risks in the neighborhood; the City of Whitewater contends that the drinking water tests safe, and the State of Wisconsin contends that there is no risk from ground contamination. (An official from the City of Whitewater points toward ground contamination, not city water, as the potential problem: “It’s not the drinking water that’s the issue, it’s the groundwater,” said Dean Fisher, director of public works.”)

There’s an environmental issue here that matters most, surely, to the homeowner and neighbors nearby. There’s another problem, however: Reassurance – even if wholly sound – from the city or state is harder to provide in any situation where notice of a possible problem is delayed.

No one should be surprised that a homeowner is upset if notice of problem takes years to arrive.

From the Daily Union:

Does Whitewater have lingering health and property value issues due to soil contamination from a gas station that closed more than a decade ago?

At least one city resident believes so, although the state Department of Natural Resources says the matter is closed.

Kathy Channing and her family live on South Clark Street, a few blocks away from the former Five Points One Stop gas station at 503 S. Janesville St. The One Stop went out of business in the late 1990s after owner Stan Meyer became ill. The gas pumps were removed in July 1998 and the gas tanks were removed 18 months later, in January 2000.

Channing’s gravest concern is about the level of benzene, a chemical used in gasoline that is a known carcinogen, or at least the vapors from any potential benzene remnants.

She said the first time she heard of contamination at the site was in a letter dated March 16, 2009, from Meyer’s wife, Elizabeth.

“The letter was dated March 16, but we did not receive it until April 17, by certified mail,” Channing recalled. “That was the first I heard about it. The letter says that I had 30 days to ask any questions, but I did not get it until 31 days after the date on the letter.”

The letter read that groundwater contamination that appeared to have originated on the Five Points One Stop property had “migrated’ onto Channings’ nearby.

“The level of benzene contamination in the groundwater on your property is above the state groundwater enforcement standards (“ES”) found in chapter NR 140, Wis. Adm. Code,” the letter stated. “However, the environmental consultants who have investigated this contamination have informed me that this groundwater contaminant plume is stable and in the process receding and will naturally degrade over time.”

From the Janesville Gazette:

The Channings learned in spring that leaking fuel tanks at the former Five Points One Stop gas station at 503 S. Janesville St. had contaminated groundwater in their neighborhood. The couple was informed the problem was going away and the state needed to close the case.

They were upset that no one had told them the groundwater was contaminated with an unsafe amount of benzene, a carcinogen, for the 10 years since the gas station closed.

Even in a small town like ours, and a Midwestern state like ours, where there’s supposed to be open and accountable government, notice of a problem may take years. It’s the kind of delay that one imagines only happens in crowded cities like Los Angeles or Chicago.

It happens here, in tiny Whitewater, and a smaller state like Wisconsin, too.

For all the self-congratulatory rhetoric one often hears from public officials in these parts about excellent customer service and efficiency, our community has some of the same delays and inefficiencies of much larger places.

I’d guess that if this happened near an official’s house, he’d be just as concerned, and twice as outspoken. The putative reassurance that you have nothing to worry about is easier to offer than to receive, and intervening years only increase that difficulty.

Daily Bread for Whitewater, Wisconsin: 1-11-10

Good morning,

It will be a chilly day, in the mid-twenties, with a chance of flurries. I doubt that ‘chilly,’ is an official, National Weather Service term, but a little change can’t hurt.

In the city today, there will be a meeting of Whitewater’s Planning Commission at 6 PM at the municipal building.

In our schools, the District Administrator, Suzanne Zentner, will hold a monthly public listening session at the school district’s central office, 419 South Elizabeth Street. There will be an English-language session from 5:00-5:45 p.m., and a Spanish-language session from 5:45-6:30 p.m.

Update: “Don’t Bring a Gun to a Snowball Fight.”

In late December, I posted a video of a Washington, D.C. police officer who unholstered his gun in a confrontation with snowball throwers. See, “Don’t Bring a Gun to a Snowball Fight.

There’s an update to the story, from Reason‘s Radley Balko, entitled, “The D.C. Snow Job.”

Here’s the situation that snowy day, as Balko describes it:

As a blizzard dumped more than a foot of snow on Washington, D.C. last month, a group of youngish, well-wired hipsters gathered in the city’s gentrifying U-Street corridor for a mass snowball fight. The idea originated and gained momentum on the social networking site Twitter. That’s significant, because by the time it was all over, the Snowball Fight Heard ‘Round the World became an apt demonstration of how social networking, easy access to publishing software, and the all-around democratization of technology is blowing open the filtered, narrowly-bored traditional channels of information, helping make both government and traditional media more accountable.

The December 19 snowball fight took an ugly turn when snowballers pelted a red Hummer making its way through the snow-packed intersection of 14th and U Streets in Northwest Washington, a part of the city with some historical turbulence, including the 1968 riots. The driver, D.C. police Detective Mike Baylor, emerged from his vehicle in plain clothes, and without identifying himself as a police officer confronted the snowballers. Baylor unholstered his gun, bringing more derision and insults to an already heated confrontation (including the chant “don’t bring a gun to a snowball fight”).

Snowballers and observers quickly began calling 911 about a man waving a gun at the intersection. That brought uniformed cops to the scene, one of whom had also (understandably, at that point) drawn his weapon. Baylor detained one person, attorney Daniel Schramm, whom the detective falsely accused of hitting him with a snowball.

Within hours, video of the altercation popped up all over the Internet (including from Reason.tv’s Dan Hayes, who was on the scene). By the morning of December 20, anyone with an Internet connection could see from multiple angles shot by multiple video cameras and cell phones that not only did Det. Baylor wave his gun, he also admitted it. Baylor is now under investigation. He’s been stripped of his badge and gun, and may lose his job.

Yet, Balko observes that there’s something even more interesting – how officials in the District of Columbia tried to conceal and deny Baylor’s conduct and how traditional media swallowed a reflexive, ‘we did nothing wrong’ posture.

First, Balko on the official response, one of easily-refuted lies:

Despite the fact that video and photographic evidence of Det. Baylor drawing his gun were already widely available on the web, MPDC Assistant Chief Pete Newsham initially issued a series of what can only be called bold-faced lies. Newsham first told the Washington City Paper, “There was no police pulling guns on snowball people.” In fact, there were two.

The Washington Post then reported:

Assistant Chief Pete Newsham, who leads the department’s investigative services bureau, said it appears the patrol officer acted appropriately, and the worst the detective might have done is use inappropriate language in dealing with the snowball fighters…

At some point, Newsham said, the detective approached the group of snowball fighters and had “some kind of interaction” with them. He said the detective holstered a cellphone, and someone from the crowd called to report a man with a gun.

“He was armed but never pulls his weapon,” Newsham said of the detective. “I think what probably happens is somebody probably saw his gun and called the police.”….

Newsham’s rush to clear Baylor’s name came before the slightest bit of investigation. Newsham also quickly deferred to Baylor’s stellar reputation and years of service, distinguishing the noble public servant from the unruly yahoos making accusations against him. That would be fine if Newsham was Baylor’s attorney. But he isn’t. He’s in charge of the MPDC unit responsible for investigating officer misconduct. And here he was disseminating clear and provable lies.

Forget the gun-waving Baylor. This is the real scandal. You’d be awfully naive to think the only time Newsham has publicly lied to defend a MPDC officer accused of misconduct was coincidentally the one time the officer’s accusers were tech-savvy hipsters armed with cell phones and video cameras. D.C. Police Chief Kathy Lanier’s investigation into the incident ought to go well beyond Baylor. From where did the false information Newsham perpetuated originate? Why was Newsham, whose position is that of a trusted liason between the department and the public, so quick to use bad information to defend a fellow officer? Shouldn’t this incident call his judgment into question in other cases? Is he still fit for the job?

Then, on how newspapers swallowed easily-disproved lies:

Don’t count on the traditional media to look into any of this. As the City Paper’s Erik Wemple reported last month, the excerpted post above, the one where Washington Post reporters Matt Zapotosky and Martin Weil uncritically regurgitate Newsham’s nonsense, came not only in the face of overwhelming video evidence to the contrary, but in spite of the fact that one of the paper’s own staffers was actually at the snowball fight and told the paper that, without question, Baylor had pulled his gun….

You may have seen the original already; if you’ve not, it’s well worth watching.

(Note: Language NSFW.)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uAgQKJuriIo&feature=player_embedded

The original story is available at

D.C. Cop Brings a Gun to a Snowball Fight! more >>

Daily Bread for Whitewater, Wisconsin: 1-8-10

Good morning,

The forecast calls for blowing snow, with a high of about nineteen degrees: a typical Wisconsin day in January.

The week ends with no municipal, public meetings scheduled today for Whitewater.

In our schools, it’s spirit day at Washington (Elementary) School, and at Whitewater Middle School.

I don’t know how many vagrants we have in Whitewater, but there was a time when Wisconsin knew how to deal with people who were just walking around, doing nothing, all day long. It was a long time ago, though, and in the century since we’ve created all sorts of management jobs for people of this disposition. The Wisconsin Historical Society recounts how we once handled these matters, and how even then, vagrants were an ornery lot:

1910 – Vagrant Snow Shovelers Strike for Pay

On this date 228 vagrants were brought in to shovel snow at the Chicago & Northwestern rail yard in Janesville. Shortly thereafter, they went on strike for 25 cents an hour and better food. Two days later, they went on strike again, asking for 30 cents an hour. [Source: Janesville Gazette]

Whitewater-Area League of Women Voters — January 2010 Newsletter

Whitewater-Area League of Women Voters’ January 2010 Newsletter is now available, and the latest issue includes a calendar of upcoming LWV events. A copy of the newsletter [2/6/10– latest issue] is available as a link on my blogroll, and through a document service called Scribd. Scribd offers its own link to the document, with the ability to view, print, and share documents, including viewing in a full-screen mode.

Updated: 2/6/10 — updated to Google Documents Viewer for a cleaner format.

Here is a sampling of upcoming events mentioned in the January newsletter:

Date: January 9th (Saturday)
Event: LWV Board Meeting
Where: Public Library, 10:00 AM

Date: January 21st (Thursday)
Event: Whitewater Area LWV Public Program, 2010 Census.
Where: Municipal Building,Council Chambers, 7:00 PM

“Professor Jolly Emrey from the Department of Political Science at the University of Wisconsin— Whitewater talking about why the census is important. Her title is “The Politics of the Census and Its Political Implications for Redistricting.” The talk is scheduled for Thursday evening the 21st of Jan. at 7:00 PM in the Council Chambers at City Hall. Professor Emrey is an alumna of Cal State—Los Angeles and she received her doctorate in Political doctorate in Political Science in 2002 from Emory University.”

2009-2010 Contemporary Issues Lecture Series

The College of Letters and Sciences at the University of Wisconsin-Whitewater is once again offering the Contemporary Issues Lecture Series. All lectures will be in the Young Auditorium at 7 p.m. and are free and open to the public. Contact Susan Johnson (johnsons@uww.edu or 472-4766) for further information.

Monday, February 15th 2010 — “Naked Trends: What Can Basic Economics Tell Us About the Future”– Charles Wheelan

“Charles Wheelan, a faculty member at the Harris School of Public Policy at the University of Chicago and a former Midwest correspondent for The Economist, writes Yahoo!‘s popular “Naked Economics” column. Prior to joining the faculty at the University of Chicago, Wheelan was Director of Policy and Communications for Chicago Metropolis 2020, a business-backed civic group promoting healthy regional growth in the Chicago area. He has written for the Chicago Tribune, the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal and other publications. His 2003 book, Naked Economics: Undressing the Dismal Science, seeks to make economics accessible, comprehensible and appealing.”

Daily Bread for Whitewater, Wisconsin: 1-7-10

Good morning,

It’s a snowy day in Whitewater, with several inches forecast, and a likely high in the mid-twenties. I am sure that any snowball throwing within the city limits of our fair city will be done appropriately, and in a positive, community-approved manner. While outside, please make sure that any snowmen you might build are the right height and weight, deviating from proper standards by 2.7% or, one hopes, an even smaller amount. An exceptional community could, and should, expect no less.

I don’t see any municipal, public meetings scheduled for today, so you can go about the private activities of work and play that support the city’s tax levy, with no additional interference.

It took until the beginning of the 20th century, but on this date in 1901, Wisconsin’s first native-born governor was inaugurated. The Wisconsin Historical Society has the details:

1901 – Robert Marion La Follette Inaugurated as Governor

On this date Robert M. La Follette was inaugurated as governor after winning the November 6, 1900 election. La Follette was born in Dane County in 1855. A Wisconsin Law School graduate and three-term member of congress, La Follette was renowned for his oratorical style. He was the first Wisconsin-born individual to serve as governor. [Source: Dictionary of Wisconsin History]

The Secret Warrants of Walworth County

Update, 2/9/10:  See a follow-up post, Update: The Secret Warrants of Walworth County.

A tenured surgeon walks into an operating room with a pair of chopsticks. Someone notices that the surgeon is carrying two wooden sticks instead of a scalpel. The surgeon replies, “Now that we’re having this discussion, I’ll address it.”

What would you think, if you heard that conversation? You might think that a surgeon should be aware of the instruments he uses, and would require no reminding from others. Any surgeon, of course, but especially one with a long tenure in that profession.

Whitewater sits, mostly, in Walworth County, where a similar story – about law, not medicine, about sealed warrants, not scalpels – recently made the pages of the Janesville Gazette and Walworth County Gazette:

Walworth County search warrants could disappear.

Here are the pertinent details, from the story:

ELKHORN – In some Wisconsin counties, sealed court documents hold back details from search warrants for a limited time while investigations are ongoing.

In Walworth County, seals have no time limit, and some records could disappear from the public eye altogether.

Motions to seal search warrants in Walworth County ask that all documents and their existence be kept under wraps. The seal acts as a seal on itself, as if the search never happened, leading some warrants to be kept away from public scrutiny.

The procedure gives law enforcement the power to search homes virtually undetected. The paper trail disappears, and interested parties are unable to find out the basis for the execution of a search warrant or how it was conducted.

Worse still, Walworth County’s long-tenured district attorney, Phil Koss, acknowledges in the story that

It has happened before, District Attorney Phil Koss said.

“The problem may come when the matter is sealed, and then we never get it filed, there’s no referral from law enforcement or for whatever reason the investigation doesn’t pan out,” Koss said.

“With really no active mechanism to tickle them, have them brought up again so that people remember to unseal them, they get filed with the clerk, the clerk is not going to unseal them, and the judge is not going to think about them until we ask him to.”

The reasons to have a limited and definite time for a seal are clear, as the story ably sets out:

Bill Lueders is the president of the non-profit Wisconsin Freedom of Information Council and news editor at Isthmus, a weekly newspaper in Madison. When documents are sealed, he said, the custodian of records should still provide as much information as possible without compromising the contained information.

“It’s important that we do not have secret courts in this country, that everything that happens in the court of law is public,” Lueders said. “The courts have tremendous amounts of power to make decisions that affect people’s lives, and it’s appropriate that there be a maximum amount of transparency.”

The goal is to protect the public’s interest to promote open and accountable courts, he said.

“The fact is that police and prosecutors occasionally do things that they shouldn’t,” Lueders said. “And for that and among other reasons, a high level of transparency is in everybody’s interest.”

Bob Dreps, an attorney at Madison-based Godfrey and Kahn law firm, said Wisconsin law is unclear, and there is no standard practice when it comes to sealing search warrants. It’s not spelled out in statutes, so each county does it differently, he said.

“The expectation is that search warrants, after they are returned, will be sealed only for good cause and only while that good cause exists,” said Dreps, who regularly represents media companies in court. “So if a prosecutor persuades a judge to seal a subpoena, it should be for a defined period of time.” ….

In Dane and Rock counties, court officials put out summaries of executed search warrants, including information about the ones sealed and how long the seal will remain.

Why should we have fewer safeguards on the power of government in Walworth County than in Rock or Dane counties? There is no principled reason at all.

How very odd, though that “Locally, Koss said changing the language on applications for seals is a start that would come from Koss’ office …” and yet D.A. Koss declares that “It’s never come up before,” Koss said. “Now that we’re having this discussion, we’ll address it.”

Oh my – the Walworth County District Attorney’s office initiates these requests, but it takes a newspaper to bring the matter to the attention of the lawyers in that office? They didn’t otherwise think about the nature of their own requests?

These gentlemen in high Walworth County positions expect deference and praise for their work, but depart time and again from the better standards of Wisconsin and America.

One sees in this story what a solid story, from a serious newspaper, looks like. If other newspapers and so-called news sites had troubled themselves these many years to do the same, we might not find ourselves so ill-governed.

Yet others haven’t, and so we do.

Landmarks Commission

I. Call to Order

II. Roll Call

III. Approval of Agenda and Possible Rearrangement

IV. Approval of Minutes of December 2, 2009 Meetings

V. Set date of next meeting (Wednesday, February 3, 2010, at 5:00 PM)

Old Business

VI. Update on Train Depot Renovation (Lashley)

VII. Update of possible moving or demolition of James and Ella Rockefeller House at 837 South Janesville Road (Scott)

VIII. Update on possible landmark status of Congregational Church Clock Tower (Scott)

IX. Report from Indian Mound Task Force Meeting – (Christ, Scott)

X. Update on Whitewater Effigy Mound Archeological Park
1. Friends of the Mounds Report (Dade)
2. Solstice Walk Observations (Scott)

XI. Action on Landmark Commission Bylaws (Singer & Daniels)

XII. Report on implementing the New Provisions of Chapter 17. (Scott)
1. Discuss establishing criteria for designation
2. List of possible items – Stone Pillars in Starin Park, Free Library Sign, White Building Lanterns

XIII. Certified Local Government Report – (Scott)

New Business

XIV. Discuss possible events and projects for 2010
1. Whitewater Historical Survey Recommendations
2. Historic Preservation Month Activities Events
3. Leaflets and Educational Materials
4. Tours

XV. Future Agenda Items

XVI. Adjournment

Daily Bread for Whitewater, Wisconsin: 1-6-10

Good morning,

It’s a forecast for mostly cloudy skies with a high of twenty degrees.

In the City of Whitewater this afternoon, there will be a Landmarks Commission meeting at 5 PM, in the City Manager’s Conference Room. Here’s the agenda for the meeting, typically held the first Wednesday of each month:

I. Call to Order

II. Roll Call

III. Approval of Agenda and Possible Rearrangement

IV. Approval of Minutes of December 2, 2009 Meetings

V. Set date of next meeting (Wednesday, February 3, 2010, at 5:00 PM)

Old Business

VI. Update on Train Depot Renovation (Lashley)

VII. Update of possible moving or demolition of James and Ella Rockefeller House at 837 South Janesville Road (Scott)

VIII. Update on possible landmark status of Congregational Church Clock Tower (Scott)

IX. Report from Indian Mound Task Force Meeting – (Christ, Scott)

X. Update on Whitewater Effigy Mound Archeological Park
1. Friends of the Mounds Report (Dade)
2. Solstice Walk Observations (Scott)

XI. Action on Landmark Commission Bylaws (Singer & Daniels)

XII. Report on implementing the New Provisions of Chapter 17. (Scott)
1. Discuss establishing criteria for designation
2. List of possible items – Stone Pillars in Starin Park, Free Library Sign, White Building Lanterns

XIII. Certified Local Government Report – (Scott)

New Business

XIV. Discuss possible events and projects for 2010
1. Whitewater Historical Survey Recommendations
2. Historic Preservation Month Activities Events
3. Leaflets and Educational Materials
4. Tours

XV. Future Agenda Items

XVI. Adjournment

At Lincoln School today, home of the Leopards, the leadership team meets from 3-5 in the LMC. (LMC: that’s the library, I think. I went to school when people still called a library a library, and there was a card catalog inside.)

On this date in 1921, in nearby Janesville, the some of the women of the city conducted a witch-hunt campaign for civic improvement against ‘salacious’ entertainment. The Wisconsin Historical Society has the details:

1921 – Janesville Women Abhor Salacious Entertainment

On this date the Janesville Federation of Women decided to “censor” movies and vaudeville in the city. Members of this organization praised and promoted what they considered “better offerings.” They were zealously critical towards those of a “salacious” nature. No follow-up ever determined whether the women were successful in their quest or if the increased publicity for “salacious” shows backfired. [Source: Janesville Gazette]

Whitewater, Wisconsin Topics for the Year Ahead

I’ve offered predictions for 2010, but here’s something different: a list of topics for this website in the year ahead. It’s sure to change, but here are a few broad topics that interest me.

1. The Press. Nothing would improve our local politics more than a strong local press. Not blogs, but a local press that’s something more than a lapdog to politicians and bureaucrats. The old year was a good lesson in how bad most press coverage of Whitewater really is, and reviewing and commenting on news coverage will require more time and attention. If anything, newspapers in 2009 got an easy pass, much to the detriment of truth, fairness, and common sense.

Only one publisher covered Whitewater and Walworth County professionally. For the rest, it was fawning, flacking, and excuse-making on behalf of politicians and bureaucrats.

I’m also curious about the relative strength of nearby papers (Register, Daily Union, Gazette), and the online Banner. The papers report their circulation figures to the state, using one from a number of circulation auditing services, but Wisconsin is tardy in updating those numbers.

We may be the only town in Wisconsin where the conflict between politician and news site is so complete they are one in the same. As much wouldn’t have happened in a normal political culture.

It’s one of the many reasons for optimism in 2010 – the examples here are so stark and egregious, that one can illuminate them easily.

2. Markets. The Phantom Stranger wrote in recently, and reminded me of some of the challenges that we have with local markets– we don’t have enough competition for certain basic services, and consumers are at the mercy of only a few suppliers. He’s right, and this is a problem for Whitewater that’s ignored when one reads or thinks only about what the City of Whitewater considers a priority.

Our municipal administration favors big ticket projects over the actual improvement that would come from a city more inviting to business.

We aren’t more attractive because we spend and tax for big ticket projects, or because we waste money marketing a town different from the one that business people will find when they actually visit Whitewater. We could be more attractive, if we would reduce significantly both taxes and regulations, and allow businesses to take root on their own.

The guiding, but shaky, hand of our municipal administration offers no real improvement in life for common people.

The only power our small city has is to regulate, and she so often oversteps prudent exercise of that authority that current businesses are burdened to exhaustion, and prospective businesses discouraged from ever setting up shop here.

3. Public Records. There’s much about which to consider, and then write, about how Whitewater’s leading politicians and bureaucrats comply with Wisconsin’s public records law.

I have a series to run, after some follow up.

4. Open Meetings. Wisconsin has an open meetings law, governing public meetings in the state. (See, WOML, ss. 19.81-19.98, Stats.)

The law is more – far more – than a guide to officials’ conduct of meetings. It’s a defense of citizens’ rights, assuring open access to public proceedings.

In Whitewater, some meetings are televised, but others aren’t. There are only so many places that Whitewater’s public access television staff can reach. They currently provide the only truly comprehensive records of Whitewater meetings.

And yet, it doesn’t have to be this way. A citizen has a right to record public meetings, too, and a municipality has a legal obligation to accommodate that recording.

There is much more to write about this topic, at another time: what the law allows citizens, what it requires of officials, and how one can usefully record public, open-session meetings in Wisconsin.

It’s enough to say this – some of these gentlemen will not end the year as they have arrogantly lived so many before: relying only on shabby minutes, with their actual words (whether many or few) unknown to the broader public.

What they once did unobserved can lawfully be recorded and seen openly. They may choose to conduct themselves as they wish: the result will be available either way.

5. Grant Spending. Ever wonder what a federal grant requires, and how the money gets spent? How a project starts out at one cost, but ends up far higher in final expense?

Why not pick a project, and find out?

The year will offer all number of twists and turns, but that’s part of the fun – the adventure – of commentary on life in town.

Daily Bread for Whitewater, Wisconsin: 1-5-10

Good morning,

There’s a forecast for a partly sunny day in Whitewater, with a high of around twenty. Nearly spring.

There are no municipal public meetings scheduled for Whitewater today. Less is more. I’d almost happily pay more in taxes for less in planning. Like protection money, I’d guess.

There’s a PTA meeting at Lakeview School tonight, at 6:30 PM.

A very predictable lesson awaits Wisconsin, and all America, really, from the Wisconsin Historical Society:

1813 – Utopian Community Leader Warren Chase Born

On this date the founder of a Fourierite Utopian community in what is now Ripon was born. Their inspiration came from the writings of Charles Fourier, a French Socialist who urged the rebuilding of society from its foundation as the only cure for economic ills such as the depression of 1837. The idea was supported by Horace Greely in New York and caught the eye of Warren Chase. Chase and others built a successful, non-religous communal society in which everyone recieved wages according to their skill, need, and work ethic. The community reached their greatest population (180) in 1845 but soon dissipated when members began moving toward agriculture as an economic tool. Families gradually left the community to live in their own houses and work their own land in the same area. In 1850, the community disbanded and $40,000 in assets was divided among the remaining members. Warren Chase moved around the country and finally settled in California, where he held many public offices. [Source: Wisconsin Saints and Sinners by Fred L. Holmes, p. 94-104]

Emphasis added.

From utopian socialist founder of failed community to politician: Why should one not be surprised?

Daily Bread for Whitewater, Wisconsin: 1-04-10

Good morning,

It’s an overcast day in the forecast for Whitewater, with a predicted high of about seventeen. I’ve had a readers tell me that she lives in a place where people start wearing overcoats when the temperature falls into the fifties. That wouldn’t be a falling temperature here; that would be an unseasonal high.

There are two municipal meetings for the city today: a senior forum at noon, and a Park and Rec Board meeting at 5 PM. The Park and Rec agenda is available online.

School is back in session today. There will be a music parents’ meeting at the high school choir room at 6:30 PM.

In our state’s proud history, on this date in 1923, according to the Wisconsin Historical Society:

1923 – Student Dancing Banned

On this date Milton College president A.E. Whitford banned dancing by students in off-campus, semi-public places such as confectionery stores. [Source: Janesville Gazette]

Sounds like a version of the movie Footloose.

Here’s a modern version of Footloose, from Drew Carey.

Link: Dance Ban: Footloose in Arizona, by Drew Carey and Reason.tv more >>

Predictions for Whitewater, Wisconsin for 2010

Here’s my local, amateur version of (the now late) William Safire’s tradition of offering annual predictions, when he was at the New York Times. The list for 2010:

1. In 2010, the University will win the following number of national sports championships:
A. None
B. One
C. Two
D. More than two

2. A new Innovation Center will, during the year, produce
A. Cold Fusion
B. the Flux Capacitor
C. More press and publicity than actual benefit
D. More actual benefit than press and publicity

3. Of the following print publications, how many will fold in 2010? (Daily Union, Janesville Gazette, Good Morning Advertiser, Whitewater Register, City of Whitewater Newsletter as Utility Bill Insert, Newsweek.)
A. None
B. One
C. Two
D. More than two

4. This year, how many incumbent Common Council members will be defeated in their bids for office?
A. None
B. One
C. Two
D. Three

5. During the year, how often will Whitewater politicians and bureaucrats use the phrases “in my years of municipal experience,” “I don’t know who would do such a thing,” “he said it was in the Constitution already,” or “move on to other business?”
A. Never
B. Occasionally
C. Often
D. Too often

6. During the year, how many high-placed city officials will leave office?
A. None
B. One
C. Two
D. Not enough

7. By year’s end, most residents will likely conclude that enforcement of city codes and ordinances is
A. Fair and impartial as always
B. Sometimes unfair and biased as currently
C. Much improved
D. Much worse

8. Retail vacancies across the city will at year’s end will be
A. Far fewer than now
B. Slightly fewer than now
C. About the same as now
D. Greater than now

9. The 2011 Whitewater city budget, adopted in the late fall, will
A. Lead to a slight net tax decrease for city residents
B. Lead to a slight net tax increase for city residents
C. Lead to a significant net tax decrease for city residents
D. Lead to a significant net tax increase for city residents

10. Tax Incremental District 4 will be a candidate for
A. Not much of anything
B. Distressed status, should the state pass relevant legislation in 2010
C. A newly-created General Motors Award for sound financial management
D. Designation as a prairie habitat

Adams’s guesses for 2010:

1. In 2010, the University will win the following number of national sports championships:
B. One

2. A new Innovation Center will, during the year, produce
C. More press and publicity than actual benefit

3. Of the following print publications, how many will fold in 2010? (Daily Union, Janesville Gazette, Good Morning Advertiser, Whitewater Register, City of Whitewater Newsletter as Utility Bill Insert, Newsweek.)
C. Two (Note to the Phantom Stranger: I think this will be the year.)

4. This year, how many incumbent Common Council members will be defeated in their bids for office?
A. None

5. During the year, how often will Whitewater politicians and bureaucrats use the phrases “in my years of municipal experience,” “I don’t know who would do such a thing,” “he said it was in the Constitution already,” or “move on to other business?”
D. Too often

6. During the year, how many high-placed city officials will leave office?
C. Two (Although ‘not enough’ is right choice, too, a priori.)

7. By year’s end, most residents will likely conclude that enforcement of city codes and ordinances is
B. Sometimes unfair and biased as currently (that is, no improvement at all)

8. Retail vacancies across the city will at year’s end will be
D. Greater than now

9. The 2011 Whitewater city budget, adopted in the late fall, will
D. Lead to a significant net tax increase for city residents

10. Tax Incremental District 4 will be a candidate for
B. Distressed status, should the state pass relevant legislation in 2010

We’ll see how I did at predicting at year’s end.