Here’s a recording — still timely — of the Whitewater League of Women Voters’ Candidates Forum from March — originally posted here on March 19th at noon.
League of Women Voters: Candidates Debate 3/10/2012 from Whitewater Community TV on Vimeo.
A few published answers, often carefully edited, cannot describe as much as the candidates themselves, answering questions at a public forum.
Readers may decide what they think of this year’s candidates. This, however, is the risk (to my way of thinking) in any year: that incumbency becomes its own ideology, and that office bends men and women to a common approach that’s less than our city needs.
The progressive and conservative alike become, in local politics, similar-sounding moderates. Although some see this as beneficial, I think they’re wrong. There’s a place for ideology at the local level, and our lack of it has done us harm.
We would be a healthier city with direct, clear, principled, ideological declarations. I’m neither progressive nor conservative, but I very much believe that the city would be better off with ideological representatives, of either view, than with officeholders of situational convictions.