Over these last several days, Wisconsin has begun a debate about the size of possible cuts to the UW System, to public school districts, and other parts of the state budget.
Some of the discussion stems from a 2.3.15 analysis from the non-partisan Legislative Fiscal Bureau. Fiscal Analyst Emily Pope, in reply to State Sen. Janet Bewley, offered an assessment of how cuts in this biennial budget might look, using the allocation employed in the last budget.
Why local publications, all of which are online, haven’t posted Ms. Pope’s document online I’ve no idea. (Shouldn’t being online encourage publications to post original documents for readers’ easy review? It’s a common practice at the Journal Sentinel and State Journal, but far less so in our part of the state.)
I’m quite sure readers can, on their own, assess this document. (One sees that at the Gazette, the paper affords Chancellor Telfer an opportunity to urge caution when reviewing percentage budgetary reductions for UW-Whitewater. See, subscription req’d, UW-Whitewater Chancellor Richard Telfer cautious with budget cut numbers.)
He’s right about that, of course. (Ms. Pope applies the method used last time to this time’s proposal; the legislature may use a different method of apportioning cuts for the upcoming biennium. Her analysis clearly explains how she’s reached these absolute and percentage figures.)
None of this should reassure Chancellor Telfer.
His administration spent years toadying to the WEDC and other state programs-of-the-moment, and yet it’s probable that UW-Whitewater will lose millions on top of the state money the school’s already wasted on undeserving, white-collar projects.
That WEDC money didn’t make UW-Whitewater stronger, it didn’t make Whitewater stronger, and it’s produced a paltry number of jobs for millions in spending and debt.
Educational spending should be used for substantive learning, not sketchy, thinly-disguised public-relations efforts. These projects are risible to well-read or properly-educated people. They’re an insult to those who believe in America’s long tradition of serious learning in the humanities and sciences.
Worse, UW-Whitewater’s heavier-than-average reliance on funding through tuition is a liability at a time when both legislative and competitive pressures leave tuition increases as an unlikely avenue to make up a shortfall.
It’s Chancellor Telfer’s budget director, Aimee Arnold, who candidly explains UW-Whitewater’s particular vulnerability: “What makes this so significant is that the primary purpose of the dollars being cut from our budget is for our primary mission.”
It’s possible that none of these cuts will come to pass, or perhaps only some of them.
But of whatever size these cuts might be, it’s evident that much of the fate of the institution over which Chancellor Telfer has been responsible these last years is, after all, beyond his grasp.
See, immediately below, the Legislative Fiscal Bureau’s analysis:


