Public Meetings
School Board Meeting
by JOHN ADAMS •
Public Meetings
School Board Meeting
by JOHN ADAMS •
Public Meetings
School Board Meeting
by JOHN ADAMS •
Public Meetings
School Board Meeting
by JOHN ADAMS •
Public Meetings
School Board Meeting
by JOHN ADAMS •
Public Meetings
School Board Meeting
by JOHN ADAMS •
Public Meetings
School Board Meeting
by JOHN ADAMS •
School District
School Board Meeting for December 17th
by JOHN ADAMS •
I’ll focus on one part of the December 17th Whitewater Unified School Board meeting — the discussion of changes to the English language curriculum. (That’s Language Arts, for specialists.)
The revisions may overcome some prior course fragmentation, but I cannot be alone in thinking that competitive, talented students would benefit with something more than AP English as the capstone of their accomplishments. WHS principal Dalzin talked about a rubric, but I’ll offer an algorithm for the schooling of competitive students: Read, Write, Speak.
There is no sound reason that competitive students should not focus on all three skills at each grade level, for all four years of high school. Placing an emphasis of writing beginning in tenth grade, rather than in each year of high school, is asking too little of talented students. In fact, it’s asking too little of almost any student. ‘Style and Rhetoric’ may be the course for college-bound students who ‘don’t especially love English,’ but should our program be tailored to a child’s preferences or an adult’s judgment of a fine education?
When I posted on “Choice in Education,” I had something like the following in mind. Here’s a challenge — establish an English program that’s a ‘great books’ program. Combine it, if you’d like, with a four-year great books history program. I know that’s heresy, but go ahead — set up one class — just one for now — that runs for four years, with an established list of great books. (Kindly set aside the tiresome debate about what constitutes a ‘great’ book. If a person can express a preference for a given beer or brat, then he or she can pick one book over another.)
In that class, over those years in each year, students will read, write, and speak about these books.
I am convinced that students will have better competitive results on standardized tests and — more importantly — as a matter of substantive knowledge, than any other English program our district now offers.
Where did we go wrong, when we thought that a canonical curriculum was too ‘conservative?’ for us, and that in substitution we needed any number of clinical-sounding course names and topics? It shows how captive we have become of bureaucratic thinking that the idea seems so radical. It is, really, just the foundation of a bold adventure. This curriculum would offer any number of creative possibilities.
It would do more, though. It would, I think, demonstrate that we’re not as competitive as we could be, and that we’re stuck in the timid belief that English cannot be taught substantively; instead, that it must be taught only through the language and manner of professional educators’ theories.
I would remind readers that many high school preparatory and college courses are not so constrained; it is not by necessity that teaching should be this way.
Somewhere along the path that saw school libraries become ‘instructional materials centers,’ merely to adopt a terminology that falsely seemed clinical and accurate, we lost our way.
City
Predictions for 2008
by JOHN ADAMS •
Former New York Times columnist William Safire used to write an annual predictions column, with multiple choice answers to questions, each new year. Here’s my local, amateur version in honor of Safire’s efforts. My predictions will be listed below the questions.
1. In 2008, the biggest Whitewater event will be
A. July 4th holiday
B. Memorial Day Parade
C. Christmas Parade
D. Celebration of another UWW national athletic championship
2. Winner of the 2008 election for Whitewater Municipal Judge will be
A. one among challengers (Ben Penwell, Art Coleman, or Colin Cheever)
B. incumbent Dick Kelly
C. Steve Spear as a write-in candidate
D. no one will vote
3. Leading vote-winner of the City of Whitewater presidential election results in November will be
A. John McCain
B. Barack Obama
C. Hillary Clinton
D. Rudy Guiliani
4. Whitewater will see the resignation of
A. a Common Council member (other than Kim Hixson)
B. a City of Whitewater department head
C. the leader of a prominent community group
D. none of the above
5. Between now and year’s end, the unemployment rate in Whitewater will
A. drop sharply
B. drop slightly
C. remain unchanged
D. increase slightly
6. The challenge of housing for students will be
A. solved
B. unchanged
C. worse
D. students? They’re not supposed to be off-campus anyway!
7. Overall vacancies in our downtown, and across the city will be
A. up significantly
B. basically unchanged
C. down slightly
D. down significantly
8. A local dentist will be nominated for a Nobel prize in
A. medicine
B. economics
C. peace
D. crowd-control
9. Market-penetration rate of the Whitewater Regsiter will
A. remain unchanged
B. decline slightly
C. decline significantly
D. increase after a subscription drive targeting lunatics
10. In 2008, Whitewater will receive news on how many new, large commercial businesses will locate to our city?
A. one
B. two
C. more than two
D. none
Adams’s guesses:
1. In 2008, the biggest Whitewater event will be
A. July 4th holiday (although I think that UWW will win another national championship; my answer is based on attendance alone)
2. Winner of the 2008 election for Whitewater Municipal Judge will be
A. one of the challengers (Note: I have no preferred candidate at this time; I merely think it’s a hard office to hold.)
3. Leading vote-winner of the City of Whitewater presidential election results in November will be
B. Barack Obama (Note: I have no preferred candidate at this time; I do think Sen. Obama will be the Democratic nominee, and would easily carry the City of Whitewater.)
4. Whitewater will see the resignation of
A. a Common Council member (other than Kim Hixson) and
C. the leader of a prominent community group
5. Between now and year’s end, the unemployment rate in Whitewater will
D. increase slightly
6. The challenge of housing for students will be
C. worse
7. Overall vacancies in our downtown, and across the city will be,
B. basically unchanged
8. A local dentist will be nominated for a Nobel prize in
D. crowd-control
9. Market-penetration rate of the Whitewater Regsiter will
B. decline slightly
10. In 2008, Whitewater will receive news on how many new, large commercial businesses will locate to our city?
A. one
We’ll see how we did at predicting at year’s end.
City, Police, Press
Questions for a Reporter, and the Community
by JOHN ADAMS •
Readers of FREE WHITEWATER know that I have written about the lawsuit against Larry Meyer, former investigator of the Whitewater Police Department. This is a public matter involving the conduct of a public employee. It tells much about how that employee was supervised and managed. Most recently, in a post entitled, “Clear Information in the Lawsuit Against Larry Meyer,” I wrote about coverage of the lawsuit from Bliss Communications, publishers of the Janesville Gazette and The Week (and their online versions).
I have always been opposed to a settlement of this matter than contains a confidentiality provision, that would prevent discussion of a public matter, involving public duties, at public expense, from a public employee. So far as I recall, press accounts of the lawsuit have never addressed this issue. (For my opposition to a confidentiality provision, see my posts entitled, Questions on the Settlement in the Larry Meyer Case and Cat Has Your Tongue?)
No public official has defended confidentiality in this matter, although I have invited Whitewater Police Chief Jim Coan, or anyone he might designate — should he lack the confidence to defend the issue himself — to offer a defense. I would post that defense in full, and reply thereafter. I made this offer on December 28th, and Chief Coan has not replied.
(Note to Coan: A literal reading of Genesis declares that all creation took only six days; you have already allowed eight days to lapse without a reply to my invitation. How hard can it be?)
There are new court filings in the case (from January 3rd), in which counsel for the Defendant, Larry Meyer, supports a motion to compel settlement.
Here are my questions for the reporters of the Gazette and Week, with a bonus question added afterward.
1. On Confidentiality. Attorney Braithwaite, representing Meyer, includes two unsigned versions of a settlement agreement in this case. These versions appear as Exhibits B and C of Attorney Braithwaite’s January 3rd affidavit. Both versions contain lengthy confidentiality provisions. Each of these provisions expressly and specifically lists your newspaper, the Janesville Gazette.
These two versions of the settlement agreement in this public matter are littered with confidentiality provisions against the public interest.
Why has your newspaper not reported that the settlement includes proposed confidentiality agreements involving a lawsuit against a public employee, involving a public matter, at public expense, during the exercise of public duties?
2. On Quoting the Walworth County District Attorney, Phillip Koss, in your December 22nd Gazette story, entitled, “Cvicker Decides Not to Settle Suit.” You quote D.A. Koss at length, protesting against the idea of a ‘global settlement,’ where charges in a prior criminal matter would be reduced in exchange for the settlement of the civil suit against Meyer.
In Exhibit A of Defense Attorney Braithwaite’s January 3rd affidavit, Braithwaite includes a copy of an email from D.A. Koss.
Will you report on that email, and in light of it, what do you believe that it says about whether discussions of a global settlement actually took place, and Koss’s candid estimation of the merits of discussing a possible global settlement?
Bonus Question:
When the Gazette reports on a story on December 22nd, why does it run the same copy in the Week with a different date, December 31st? I understand that it’s publication in a second paper, but why not indicate that the story is a republication of an earlier story? The story is not ‘new’ on DEcember 31st, it’s nine days old. Why not indicate that the story is a republication?
Cartoons & Comics
Friday Morning Cartoon
by JOHN ADAMS •
Elmer Fudd displays his musical talent in one of his finest roles. This is my first post of the new year — a light, happy start. Enjoy.
Public Meetings
Common Council Meeting
by JOHN ADAMS •
City, Police
The Force We Need
by JOHN ADAMS •
I have been — for sound, inescapable reasons — a critic of the state in which Jim Coan has left our lovely, but troubled, city. He, and those who have supported him, have made life worse for others. I have watched, day after day, as he has taken this city and its police force down the wrong path.
My family have a great familiarity with police work, one having committed himself to a lifetime of intelligent, dedicated leadership in that field. We well-understand this vocation, and it is the gap in leadership between what should be, and what is, that both astonishes and infuriates. Only someone confused, or ignorant could have confidence in the leadership that burdens and embarrasses our current force, and the city it is sworn to serve.
There are many in Whitewater who would like the force to be more than it is, and I know how disappointed they are that it lacks the leadership it needs.
A few remarks —
Firearms. I have been around firearms my entire life. A sound familiarity with them assures that they will be used properly and efficiently in those rare occasions when necessary. A man should be so comfortable with a gun that he can use it dispassionately under deadly circumstances, and never so excited by it that he might consider it a toy or plaything.
Sometimes — in places without good leadership — a young or foolish officer will make the mistake of showing off with a gun, or pointing it inappropriately. No serious man can respect a person like this; it betrays an immaturity that is the subject of scorn from serious men. Any case like this, whenever it happens, should be subject to (1) real and effective coaching, (2) emotional evaluation, and (3) progressive discipline.
Warriors. Like all libertarians, I advocate “free markets, individual liberty, and peace.” Americans have always preferred peace, so that we might trade and travel freely with friendly nations around the globe.
Nonetheless, there are times when our country has faced foreign enemies, and for our own protection, we have exercised a legal and moral right to defend ourselves. Countless Americans — in your family and mine — have justly and courageously defended our country against Nazi, Imperial Japanese, and Soviet-sponsored tyranny, as we now face the Taliban and Al Qaeda. These enemies were, and are, reprehensible, and we have always had a legitimate right to wage war until their surrender or destruction.
We cannot be at war with our fellow citizens and residents. The war power is reserved for our reprehensible enemies abroad, not those who live among us. There is a powerful distinction even between suspected criminals and foreign enemies. Warriors include — for example — those who must, by sad necessity, travel abroad to defend a new, better Afghanistan against those who killed our fellow citizens, and who would do so again if given the chance. They, in combat in faraway Afghanistan, away from their families, facing a detestable enemy, are real warriors.
When Jim Coan tells us he sees the Whitewater Police Force as warriors, and goes on about it as he once did in his newsletter, he’s telling us nonsense, leading officers away from true community policing, and using a false metaphor to puff himself up. When one starts to think that way, one begins to see one’s fellow residents as an enemy. The authority of warriors is not conferred on anyone who protects the streets of Whitewater. General Bradley was a warrior, defending civilization against the Nazis; Chief Coan is not a warrior when he sits alone at Randy’s eating lunch, or any other time of the day, evening, etc. Coan might imagine himself a warrior, but it doesn’t matter — at all — what he thinks about over his plate.
Speaking to Others. Sometimes, a young or poor officer will approach someone at a traffic stop, or elsewhere, and think that he’ll make himself look more powerful if he begins with a leading or hostile question. It doesn’t work: timid people resent the encounter afterwards, and confident and clever people just think the officer’s not strong or confident enough to speak normally. Don’t allow others to drag down one’s reputation through hackneyed, third-rate phrases. People have described to me all the most transparent, foolish phrases that mediocre officers have used in conversations. Don’t let people carry on like this, and don’t think that a leader’s empty insistence that it never happens convinces anyone. It doesn’t.
Wade Into Our Community. This can be a beautiful and well-run place once again. Officers should embrace the community that they serve and be a part of it; community policing is the very opposite of a puffed-up idea of officers as warriors. Here is our invitation: Live here with us, worship here with us, send your children to our schools, and shop in our markets. We will be your neighbors and friends. Policing will be better, officers will feel better about their jobs, and our community will be safer.
If you live elsewhere, think about living with us here in Whitewater.
A serious man or woman doesn’t need a lot of confidence-building talk to feel good. He doesn’t rely on silly commendations in a newsletter to be proud of himself or his department. He commits himself to self-improvement, not happy talk. When the day ends, he feels proud for his efforts, needing no sugary acknowledgment.
That’s not how weak leaders behave: they fill men up with empty praise, thinking it will make them more popular than through real coaching and accountability. One should not let a leader treat subordinates as through they are overgrown boys. It’s embarrassing, and corrosive of true excellence.
A Good Police Commission. A strong and capable force welcomes good and open oversight. That’s how you can be proud of your work: through legitimate, dedicated, believable oversight. Our Police Commission is so far removed from a good, solid body that it falls near the bottom of any commission or board in the city. People spend far more time working to make other boards and committees genuine than on the PFC. I ran a series on our PFC recently, and to say that it operates as a ‘big nothing’ would be too generous. It’s run by volunteers, and if a person volunteers, he or she should work to deliver something respectable.
Officers and citizens could ask for a real, hard-working PFC to provide true oversight of which all can be proud. There should be a real citizen complaints process, not the empty one we have, that falls far short of reasonable suggestions from the U.S. Department of Justice. I invite anyone who is a member of the PFC to write to me, and defend his or her work. I can be reached at adams@freewhitewater.com. (They know very well what I have written on this matter of public policy. I have posts entitled Introduction, Importance and Authority, Reasonable Standards, Minutes, Performance Generally, Citizen Complaints, and Hirings without Oversight?) A weak PFC and a weak complaints process erodes community confidence.
Residents and Citizens. Finally, I heard once how Coan said something to the effect that those who were upset about the Star Packaging raid were likely outsiders, were just agitating people within the Hispanic community in Whitewater, or were perhaps from the ACLU, etc. (He forgot to mention that criticism of his leadership might be inspired by Martians, gremlins, or talking squirrels. Give him long enough, though…)
Nothing is funnier. It must be clear that I am neither an outsider, nor Spanish-speaking, nor a member of the ACLU, etc. (I regret, if anything, that I understand so little Spanish.)
Coan is one of the last people on earth who should ever talk about loyalty and commitment to our community. If he expects people to believe what he says about community concerns, it must only be because he considers others ignorant, gullible, or stupid.
If we have good leadership, we can have a more effective force, and one that will offer better experiences for the community and its sworn officers.
