FREE WHITEWATER

Sunday Animation: Excerpt from Pierre et Le Loupe

PIERRE ET LE LOUP (Peter and the Wolf – excerpt) from Pierre-Emmanuel Lyet on Vimeo.

Un film de Gordon, Pierre-Emmanuel Lyet et Corentin Leconte
30 minutes (extrait / exerpt)

Une coproduction Camera Lucida productions et Radio France
avec la participation de France Télévisions

Musique de Sergueï Prokokiev
avec l’Orchestre National de France,
dirigé par le maestro Daniele Gatti
Raconté par François Morel
Illustré par Pierre-Emmanuel Lyet

Animation et effets visuels : Doncvoilà productions
Animateurs : Jean-Yves Castillon, Emmanuel Linderer et Christophe Nardi
Superviseurs des effets spéciaux : Stéphane Jarreau
Compositeurs : Julien Baret, Fabrice Casali, Julie Guerineau, Gwen Habert, Olivier Martin et Stéphane Jarreau

Daily Bread for 11.2.14

Good morning, Whitewater.

Sunday in town will be partly cloudy with a high of fifty-two. Sunrise is 6:31 AM and sunset 4:45 PM. We will have 10h 13m 53s of daytime.

Sometimes one encounters an alligator and lives to tell the tale. This is one of those times:

Daily Bread for November 1, 2014

Good morning, Whitewater.

A new month begins, with only four days until Tuesday’s election. We’ll have sunny skies and a high of forty-five in the Whippet City.

The FW Halloween poll results are in, and vampires have won the most responses, with 32.26% of the total. Last year, with the same choices available, ghosts led with 28.89%.

What’s it look like – observed closely – when a drop of water hits a pool of that same liquid? It look like this, as recorded by scientists of fluid dynamics in Brazil:

On this day in 1952, America first tests a hydrogen bomb:

The idea of a thermonuclear fusion bomb ignited by a smaller fission bomb was first proposed by Enrico Fermi to his colleague Edward Teller in 1941 at the start of what would become the Manhattan Project.[3] Teller spent most of the Manhattan Project attempting to figure out how to make the design work, to some degree neglecting his assigned work on the Manhattan Project fission bomb program. His difficult and devil’s advocate attitude in discussions led Robert Oppenheimer to sidetrack him and other “problem” physicists into the super program to smooth his way.

Stanislaw Ulam, a coworker of Teller, made the first key conceptual leaps towards a workable fusion design. Ulam’s two innovations which rendered the fusion bomb practical were that compression of the thermonuclear fuel before extreme heating was a practical path towards the conditions needed for fusion, and the idea of staging or placing a separate thermonuclear component outside a fission primary component, and somehow using the primary to compress the secondary. Teller then realized that the gamma and X-ray radiation produced in the primary could transfer enough energy into the secondary to create a successful implosion and fusion burn, if the whole assembly was wrapped in a hohlraum or radiation case.[3] Teller and his various proponents and detractors later disputed the degree to which Ulam had contributed to the theories underlying this mechanism. Indeed, shortly before his death, and in a last-ditch effort to discredit Ulam’s contributions, Teller claimed that one of his own “graduate students” had proposed the mechanism.

The “George” shot of Operation Greenhouse of 9 May 1951 tested the basic concept for the first time on a very small scale. As the first successful (uncontrolled) release of nuclear fusion energy, which made up a small fraction of the 225kt total yield,[19] it raised expectations to a near certainty that the concept would work.

On November 1, 1952, the Teller–Ulam configuration was tested at full scale in the “Ivy Mike” shot at an island in the Enewetak Atoll, with a yield of 10.4 megatons (over 450 times more powerful than the bomb dropped on Nagasaki during World War II). The device, dubbed the Sausage, used an extra-large fission bomb as a “trigger” and liquid deuterium—kept in its liquid state by 20 short tons (18 metric tons) of cryogenic equipment—as its fusion fuel, and weighed around 80 short tons (70 metric tons) altogether.

A pen magnate is born on this day in 1863:

1863 – George Safford Parker Born
On this date George Safford Parker was born in Shullsburg. While studying telegraphy in Janesville, he developed an interest in fountain pens. In 1891 he organized the Parker Pen Company in Janesville. The company gained world-wide acclaim for innovations like the duo-fold pen and pencil. Parker served as president of the company until 1933. Parker died on July 19, 1937. [Source: Dictionary of Wisconsin Biography, p.280]

Boo! Scariest Things in Whitewater, 2014





Here’s the eighth annual FREE WHITEWATER list of the scariest things in Whitewater for 2014. The 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, and 2013 editions are available for comparison.

The list runs in reverse order, from mildly frightening to super scary.

10. Hard work & standard usage. Everyone makes mistakes, typos, etc.  (I’m appreciative of every correction or suggestion a reader makes.)  It shouldn’t be too much, though, to expect officials to try harder to speak and write properly. 

What does it profit a committee to have two or three professionals if their presence does nothing to lift policies and documents beyond the quality of a struggling high-school student’s work? 

Whitewater is filled with smart and studious people who, at work or in school, will proofread important term papers or notes. 

There is no ‘special’ or ‘separate’ path on which we should not at least try to write as our forefathers did.  They did so with far fewer technological advantages than we have; we can do at least as well as they did. 

9. Ordinary input.  It’s hard to gather, but we should try harder to survey large numbers through sound methods.  It’s not enough to rely on ad hoc committees.  Their small numbers may lead astray from a selection bias. 

8. Ordinary streets.  The East Gateway project looks great, but do you feel $2,300,00 richer for it?  When you awoke this morning, was the sun $2,300,000 brighter, children that much happier, or merchants that much better off? 

One-hundred thousand on potholes and simple repair would have been useful, and another one-hundred thousand on emergency poverty assistance,  and taxpayers would have been millions better off. 

7. Small merchants.  What strange brick-and-mortar-phobia causes leaders to shy from supporting our own merchants?   

Snazzy tech ventures sound great, but their results are often sketchily unverifiable.  They’re bright and shiny, but then so is a fishing lure. 

Sales pitches from these tech-ventures work on the gullible, the ignorant, or the intoxicated. 

By contrast, we haven’t done enough for brick-and-mortar merchants.  For a fraction of the vast sums (hundreds of thousands) we’ve spent on rejected tech projects from other cities, we could boost brick-and-mortar merchants in traditional, conventional ventures that will attract customers to our own downtown. 

Boosting what we have is both cheaper and more sensible.  Here’s hoping the 2015 budget item for merchants passes and helps overcome this fear by supporting the small retailers we now have.  Their success will bring others.

6. Layers.  Fifteen-thousand people in our small city, but hierarchies like the Pentagon’s.  It’s an insecure person’s attempt to seem important or profound.  Few are truly impressed, so why bother?  

5. Speaking without a press release. Is it so scary to speak to people directly?  Must every official hide behind a press agent? 

Honest to goodness, the quality of their press releases is laughable in any event; tired boilerplate that everyone’s heard a thousand times before. 

When campus officials speak, why must they do they do so in the stilted and tired language of bureaucracy? 

It’s as though they each had a pack of Oxford 3X5 Glow Index Cards, Ruled, Assorted Colors, 300 Count, with words written for each occasion (spending of public money, responses to investigations, name-dropping at parties, etc.) 

They should forget the script, and the middling scriptwriter.   

4. Parking.  People live in town, and so they want to park in town.  It’s neither unexpected nor frightening that they do. 

3. Extreme. So a new apartment building at Main & Prince is ‘too extreme’ in design for Whitewater?  Well, I would guess that existing landlords must think so.  [Update: For consumers it’s a good thing, and a bad joke that anyone from the CDA would shill against it.]

2. Practical solutions.  Small and simple isn’t inadequate because it’s small and simple. 

1. A city without a proposal from a big vendor.   There are a few gentlemen who act as though Whitewater would shrivel if there were not a multi-million-dollar proposal for a supercalifragilisticexpialidocious project always in the oven. 

The supposed benefits are shouted; the risks unspoken. 

There will be another of this kind, soon I wouldn’t wonder. 

There’s the 2014 list.  We’re more than able to overcome these fears, and assure a happier and more prosperous city. 

Best wishes to all for a Happy Halloween. 

Daily Bread for 10.31.14

Good morning, Whitewater.

Whitewater will see a bit of snow in the early morning, on a chilly Halloween day with a high of thirty-nine.

Google has a doodle (one of several, really) to mark Halloween:

Google Doodle Halloween

On this day in 1968, a win:

1968 – Milwaukee Bucks Win First Game
On this date the Milwaukee Bucks claimed their first victory, a 134-118 win over the Detroit Pistons in the Milwaukee Arena. The Bucks were 0-5 at the time, and Wayne Embry led Milwaukee with 30 points. Embry became the first player in Bucks history to score 30 or more points in a regular season game. [Source: Milwaukee Bucks]

Google-a-Day asks about music:

During what musical period did composers perfect and standardize the concerto, sonata and symphony forms?

Here’s an animated graphic from the Saline Project‘s animators for the day:

thewitch_mvhv

Message Independence

Look at Whitewater, and one sees scores of groups with press releases, community announcements, or political viewpoints to publicize.  Even much smaller communities have similar conditions: a dozen people are likely to have more than a dozen views. 

Each day, and especially in an election year, it helps to have the independence to offer views one truly supports, rather than what others expect or want to published.  In this, there’s an advantage in being an independent commentator, aided even more by being a libertarian, a member of a third party. 

Honest to goodness, it’s a blessing to act independently, from a position of strength, without need to please, cater, or oblige. 

Even in more placid times, it’s not worth flacking whatever comes along.  A man or woman should be his or her own man or woman. 

In these times, with schemers near and far looking for someone to push any nutty contention that they’ve concocted for the occasion, it’s even better to stand away from that mud pit. 

Daily Bread for 10.30.14

Good morning, Whitewater.

Thursday in town will be cloudy with a high of fifty-four, and just a one-in-five chance of rain.

On this day in 1938, Orson Welles captivates and scares America with a radio play:

“The War of the Worlds” is an episode of the American radio drama anthology series The Mercury Theatre on the Air. It was performed as a Halloween episode of the series on October 30, 1938, and aired over the Columbia Broadcasting System radio network. Directed and narrated by actor and future filmmaker Orson Welles, the episode was an adaptation of H. G. Wells’s novel The War of the Worlds (1898). It became famous for causing mass panic, although the extent of this panic is debated.[3]

The first two thirds of the 62-minute broadcast were presented as a series of simulated news bulletins, which suggested to some listeners that an actual alien invasion by Martians was currently in progress. Compounding the issue was the fact that the Mercury Theatre on the Air was a sustaining show (it ran without commercial breaks), adding to the program’s realism, and that others were primarily listening to Edgar Bergen and only tuned in to the show during a musical interlude, thereby missing the introduction that proved the show was a drama.[3] In the days following the adaptation, there was widespread outrage in the media.[4] The program’s news-bulletin format was described as cruelly deceptive by some newspapers (which had lost advertising revenue to radio) and public figures, leading to an outcry against the perpetrators of the broadcast and calls for regulation by the Federal Communications Commission.[3] Despite these complaints—or perhaps in part because of them—the episode secured Welles’s fame as a dramatist.

On this day in 1914, Wisconsin gets her first 4-H Club:

1914 – First 4-H Club in Wisconsin Organized
On this date the Linn Junior Farmers Club in Walworth County was organized. This club was started five months after Congress passed the Smith-Lever Act which created the Cooperative Extension Service whereby federal, state, and county governments participate in the county agent system. [Source: History Just Ahead: A Guide to Wisconsin’s Historical Markers]

Google-a-Day asks a question about a band:

The main character in the Broadway production of “Jersey Boys” was the lead singer for a band that celebrated their first commercial release in what year?

For today, from the Saline Project‘s animators, let’s go with a Loch Ness Monster for Halloween:

lochnessmonster_mvhv

Happy National Cat Day

If you like cats, you’re in fine company.  Lincoln, Twain, Hemingway, and countless other great Americans from our history were cat admirers. 

Via Wall Street Journal.

Here’s a kitten enjoying a drink of formula as though celebrating the occasion:

Whitewater Educational Referendum Post 3: An Invitation

Like so many others in Whitewater, I am a believer in both proper schooling and lifelong learning.  My father and uncle first introduced me to campus life when I was still a small boy. 

Years later, I had the pleasure of their visits to campus when I was a student.  On those visits, my father enjoyed walking with me through the university’s main library, with long row upon long row of many generations’ works, reminding me of both the hope and humility that accumulated learning suggests. 

After this referendum, however it may end, our schools will have an ongoing task ahead: What will we teach, and how will we teach it?  One may consider this the broad curriculum, of academics, athletics, and the arts. 

In this sincere spirit, I have an invitation to extend to the administrators, teachers, and supporters of education in this community:

I’ll offer this space, for an ongoing written discussion of topics of our schools’ broader curriculum.  We may each pick a set of topics we’d like: I would suggest a few topics, and any number of others may choose topics they’d like to discuss. 

Each topic’s discussion could continue, in post and reply, throughout a week.  One person begins, another replies, and that’s how the conversation goes: post, reply, further replies, back & forth during a week, on a designated topic.

Examples of written discussions like this are available online from the Cato Institute and at the Wall Street Journal in discussions of books, for example. 

Our discussion would be as important as any of those.  We, in Whitewater, can do just as well in conversation as, if not better than, anyone in those publications. 

There are so many in Whitewater who care about education as education, as subjects of study and the teaching to advance them.  Are you not tired of politicking, of finance-driven discussions, and shabby public-relations efforts to boost one statistic or another?  Isn’t learning more than that, more than peddling?

Make no mistake, a New Whitewater is inevitable.  There are years yet ahead in its progress, but there’s no going back.  The future writes the history of the present; it won’t be written in the language or from the viewpoint of a few clinging only to past practices and ideas.

Of our district administration, faculty, and all residents who support education, I’d ask: why not join in a forward-looking discussion on what matters most?

We can pick a time after this referendum to begin: what’s at stake is even bigger than an election.  I have, as do so many others in town, the patience of conviction. 

Members of our community will, I’ve no doubt, have this discussion.  Why not have it together?  We will do better together, one can be quite sure.

I’ll be here, available for scheduling that substantive discussion, waiting patiently just a click away:

adams@freewhitewater.com
.

Previously: Whitewater Educational Referendum Post 1: Overall Politics and Whitewater Educational Referendum Post 2: Local Campaign