FREE WHITEWATER

No Resolution

There was a Planning Commission meeting last night, and the principal topic was a proposal to extend a zoning overlay on North Fremont from the existing overlay in the Starin Park neighborhood (those few streets to the west of Fremont, and between Main and Starin). The zoning overlay would prohibit more than two unrelated persons from living in a residential home (the number permitted is now three).

All these years, and yet there’s still no solution to concerns about student residential housing. There’s a reason for that: there’s a demand for student residential housing. Whitewater is home to a large university campus with thousands of students.

The issue hasn’t been resolved, and will not be, until Whitewater’s housing market meets that demand. Changing the economics of residential housing in a neighborhood will not change the overall demand in the city.

That there’s an existing comprehensive plan that consigns student housing to one part of the city or another means – practically – next to nothing; if it meant something meaningful independent of demand, the city wouldn’t be having the same conversation again and again for these last several years.

Hoping to channel that demand into the northwest corner of the city (as a higher density neighborhood) will only work if there’s comparative gain in meeting demand through construction there.

Municipal planning, through zoning or enforcement, is a piker when compared against the housing demands of hundreds, if not thousands.

That’s why Whitewater’s not yet resolved this issue.

Daily Bread for 9.10.13

Good morning.

Tuesday will be a hot and sunny day, with a high of ninety.

At 5:30 PM tonight, there will be a joint Common Council and Planning session on the Zoning Rewrite project.

For Tuesday, it’s a Scientific American trivia question about inside temperatures. (Clicking the question below takes you to the answer on the SciAm website.)

Here’s the question for today:

How hot is the earth at its core?

They might know the answer, but they’ve their hands full as it is:

On this day in 1813, America wins a naval victory over Britain:

The Battle of Lake Erie, sometimes called the Battle of Put-in-Bay, was fought on 10 September 1813, in Lake Erie off the coast of Ohio during the War of 1812. Nine vessels of the United States Navy defeated and captured six vessels of British Royal Navy. This ensured American control of the lake for the rest of the war, which in turn allowed the Americans to recover Detroit and win the Battle of the Thames to break the Indian confederation of Tecumseh. It was one of the biggest naval battles of the War of 1812.

Daily Bread for 9.9.13

Good morning.

Whitewater begins her work week with cloudy skies through mid morning, then clearing, and a high of eighty-nine.

Whitewater’s Planning Commission meets this evening at 6 PM.

On this day in 1776, America becomes the United States:

…the Continental Congress formally declares the name of the new nation to be the “United States” of America. This replaced the term “United Colonies,” which had been in general use.

In the Congressional declaration dated September 9, 1776, the delegates wrote, “That in all continental commissions, and other instruments, where, heretofore, the words ‘United Colonies’ have been used, the stile be altered for the future to the “United States.”

A resolution by Richard Henry Lee, which had been presented to Congress on June 7 and approved on July 2, 1776, issued the resolve, “That these United Colonies are, and of right ought to be, free and independent States….” As a result, John Adams thought July 2 would be celebrated as “the most memorable epoch in the history of America.” Instead, the day has been largely forgotten in favor of July 4, when Jefferson’s edited Declaration of Independence was adopted. That document also states, “That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be FREE AND INDEPENDENT STATES.” However, Lee began with the line, while Jefferson saved it for the middle of his closing paragraph.

By September, the Declaration of Independence had been drafted, signed, printed and sent to Great Britain. What Congress had declared to be true on paper in July was clearly the case in practice, as Patriot blood was spilled against the British on the battlefields of Boston, Montreal, Quebec and New York. Congress had created a country from a cluster of colonies and the nation’s new name reflected that reality.

On 9.9.1954, the residents of Janesville debate alcohol restrictions:

1954 – Janesville Residents Debate Liquor Laws
On this date Janesville residents participated in a public forum at the Janesville Public Library. The topic of discussion was whether Janesville should allow women to be served at the bar, in taverns. Residents also debated whether dancing should be allowed in taverns. Speaking to lift the bans was Erv Lacey, field director of the Tavern League of Wisconsin. Lacey noted that the law against women being served was discriminatory and contended that Janesville taverns lose business because of the laws. The Rev. Frank Dauner, pastor of United Brethren Church, said the strict prohibitions should remian intact because alcohol threatened public health, safety and peaceful domestic life. [Source: Janesville Gazette]

On the 9.6.2013 Friday Poll: Dog or… Chupacabra?!?, there’s a fairly decisive result: 57.69% say chupacabra, to 42.31% who say dog. No need for a recount: a clear majority of respondents say those blue-eyed quadrupeds are blood-sucking demons from beyond.

A noted cryptozoologist fortuitously saw the Friday post, and kindly passed along a link to http://chupacabrapictures.org/. Much appreciated, to be sure.

I’ll mix things up a bit by adding a daily trivia question from Scientific American online. (Clicking the question below takes you to the answer on the SciAm website.)

Here’s the question for today:

20130908-183009.jpg

How far do Monarch butterflies travel a day, on average, during migration?

Recent Tweets, 9.1 to 9.7

Daily Bread for 9.8.13

Good morning.

A mostly cloudy Sunday, with a high of seventy-four, awaits.

NASA recently launched a new moon probe, LADEE, and after a technical glitch now resolved, it’s on the way.

….LADEE moon mission, short for Lunar Atmosphere and Dust Environment Explorer, is aimed at studying the moon’s thin atmosphere and solving long-standing mysteries of the moon’s dust.

The atmosphere of the moon, known as an “exosphere,” is so thin that individual molecules don’t interact with each other. Similar environments have been seen on Mercury, the moons of outer planets in the solar system, as well as some asteroids, so scientists are hoping LADEE will help better understand these strange environments.

LADEE scientists also hope the mission will yield insights into the odd “lunar glow” spotted on the moon’s horizon by Apollo astronauts during NASA’s lunar landings in the 1960s and 1970s. The mission will also track how moon dust moves across the lunar surface, which is key interest because the abrasive stuff can stick to spacesuits and clog up systems on future moon vehicles and rovers.

LADEE will take about 30 days to reach the moon and spend 100 days performing its lunar atmosphere and dust mission. The spacecraft will also test a new laser communications system that NASA has billed as a kind of new “interplanetary Internet.”

At the end of its mission, LADEE will plummet down to the moon and crash into the lunar surface.

Here’s the liftoff:

On this day in 1958, a regulation ends:

1958 – Janesville Women Belly Up to the Bar
On this date the Janesville city council voted 4-2 to finally end a paternalistic and discriminatory ordinance that prohibited women from drinking at the bar. Since the end of Prohibition in 1933, women had been banned from being served while standing at the bar in Janesville taverns. [Source: Janesville Gazette]

Daily Bread for 9.7.13

Good morning.

Saturday will be partly sunny, with a high of eighty-five, and a one-fifth chance of afternoon thundershowers. Sunrise was 6:26 AM, and sunset will be 7:19 PM. The moon is a waxing crescent with 5% of its visible disk illuminated.

What do the skies above Japan look like? They look like this:

The Fox @ UW-W

There have been sightings of a fox on campus. Why he’s here, one cannot say, and in any event the best course is to leave a wild animal alone.

For the curious, though, I’ve embedded a video documentary describing that very fox’s life with complete accuracy and absolutely sensitivity to the highest standards of nature films:

Council and the East Gateway Project

Earlier this week, among other topics, Common Council considered additional spending, amounting to hundreds of thousands, for burial of lines underground as part of the two-million-dollar East Gateway project.

City Manager Clapper presented his summary of the benefits of the underground installation, of the alternatives, and his recommendation to spend additionally for the installation. There’s no dispute that there would be benefits; the real question is whether those benefits would be firm and measurable.

I’d say that Council wisely rejected the additional spending. (But then, I opposed any initial spending on the project; Council’s unwillingness to commit another fifteen-percent beyond the more than two million already authorized seems to me both welcome and prudent.)

The discussion about additional spending took place, by my count, for about seventeen minutes, beginning at twenty minutes into the meeting.

Now a few remarks about a principal question that the city faces. Mr. Clapper is intelligent and educated. (If I understand his schooling correctly, he has both an undergraduate and graduate degree from a competitive environment.)

Yet we face a question that pertains, regardless of schooling or intellect: can the advocates of additional spending show reasonably and dependably that there will be a sufficient economic benefit from those incremental expenditures?

It’s true that underground wiring would make the surface look nicer, and that might spur development, might attract businesses, might boost the economy in the years ahead.

What might be, however, is a justification too slender for hundreds of thousands (let alone millions) of spending (of taxes or public debt).

You and I and Mr. Clapper, the community together, would face this question even if there were no universities, no classes, no degrees: Is incremental spending reasonably justified?

All too often, I’d contend, we have pushed ahead without knowing, pushed ahead simply by pretending, hoping against reason, only to find disappointment after the grand headlines turn yellow: failed tax incremental districts and pricey public buildings that struggle even to make their legally-required payments in lieu of taxes.

City Manager Clapper has a decades-long career ahead of him, as do the members of Council, of public committees, and so many others in our city (including even a blogger here or there). We’ll be able to look back a generation from now and see how all this transpires.

It will develop best (as I am sure it will) if we undertake planning and expenditure only after reasonable and thorough estimation of the economic benefit.

I simply don’t think that there was a sufficient justification for additional spending in this case. Better still, as was true here (made possible in part by the city manager’s welcome, matter-of-fact presentation): one can have discussions like this without the sky falling in.

That’s progress.