Good morning.

Monday in Whitewater will be windy with a high of 75. Sunrise is 5:45 and sunset is 7:59 for 14 hours 14 minutes of daytime. The moon is a waning gibbous with 92.5 percent of its visible disk illuminated.
The Whitewater School Board’s Policy Review Committee meets at 4:30 PM.
On this day in 1961, the Freedom Riders begin a bus trip through the South.
In some political developments, there’s more than one way to assess an event. As a sensible approach, should assess what one believes is accurate yet be open to being proved wrong.
On the existence of bipartisanship in Wisconsin politics, recent campaign spending produces two possible theories. The first possibility is that conservative spending on WISGOP candidates with selected moderate positions is a sign of increasing bipartisanship. The second possibility is that spending on these candidates is an attempt to preserve their incumbencies to support more conservative WISGOP positions on many other issues.
Brittany Carloni writes that recent ads suggest Republicans are reading the national mood and emphasizing bipartisan legislation:
In a late-night press conference during the final days of the Assembly session in February, eight Republican lawmakers in some of the chamber’s most closely contested districts made a dramatic announcement.
They told reporters they had persuaded longtime Assembly Speaker Robin Vos, R-Rochester, to allow essential votes on bills to extend postpartum Medicaid coverage for new Wisconsin mothers and to require insurance companies to cover additional screenings for women at increased risk of breast cancer. Vos had opposed the bills, which stalled in the Assembly for months.
Two months after the bills passed the Assembly, the Jobs First Coalition, a political advocacy organization that has backed Republican candidates, released ads lauding the efforts of some of those GOP lawmakers to get the two women’s health bills signed into law. Michelle Litjens Vos, the speaker’s wife and a former state lawmaker, works on fundraising and event planning for the Jobs First Coalition, according to recent tax documents.
[…]The ads, which have been shared as candidates are circulating nomination papers to get on the November ballot, point to an Assembly Republican strategy cognizant of a national mood that has turned on President Donald Trump and the Republican establishment. The bills also highlight a political issue that appeals to female voters, a voting group that Republicans have often struggled with at the national level.
See Brittany Carloni, Conservative group’s ad campaign pits vulnerable Wisconsin Republicans against their own party leadership, Wisconsin Watch, May 4, 2026.
In this reading of events, these ads show a move away from traditional WISGOP positions generally. Perhaps this is an accurate reading.
There is, however, an alternative reading of this ad spending. This libertarian blogger, being skeptical of claims of bipartisanship, would contend that WISGOP support for some moderate (WisDems) positions may be an attempt to re-elect vulnerable Republican incumbents who will, if reelected, simply vote the WISGOP line on other issues. And so, and so — a few moderate positions for the sake of reelection and immoderate votes within a WISGOP caucus once reelected.
Which assessment is more accurate? We don’t know, and will not know unless these WISGOP candidates are reelected and their full voting records are examined beginning next year.
For now, I’m doubtful of genuine, comprehensive bipartisanship. These ads look to skeptical eyes as no more than situational, temporary positioning for immediate electoral advantage.
_____
Upcoming posts (in no decided order): Claims of Legacy, a Particular Species of Democrat, a Whitewater Comparative Analysis, Whitewater’s Workforce, ‘What Ails, What Heals’ Reviewed, and Outcome Driven Argumentation.





