Here’s a poll and comment forum topic for the weekend of Christmas: What’s your favorite holiday film?
I’ve a poll with a few choices, and a comment form below. Some of the poll choices come from a list of top Christmas films at Collider.com.
Author Archive for JOHN ADAMS
Cats
Friday Catblogging: Cat-a-palooza Christmas Edition
by JOHN ADAMS •
It’s three — yes three — cat videos for the Friday before Christmas.
The Jingle Cats sing O Come All Ye Faithful:
Cat hugs kitten:
Cat soothes crying baby (h/t Huffington Post):
Daily Bread
Daily Bread for 12.23.11
by JOHN ADAMS •
Good morning.
It’s a cloudy day with a high of thirty-two ahead for Whitewater. In St. Louis, today will be a day of decreasing clouds and a high of forty.
On this day in 1986, a triumph of aviation:
the experimental airplane Voyager, piloted by Dick Rutan and Jeana Yeager, completed the first non-stop, around-the-world flight without refueling as it landed safely at Edwards Air Force Base in California.
Google’s daily puzzle is a straight-forward one, and one that also points out how many and diverse are the uses of plants: “Strong, durable, and deciduous, with samara fruits that spin as they fall. What is the name of this tree that has many uses — it can be made into bats, violins and beautiful veneers?”
City, Libertarians, Politics
Offices, Debates, Local Politics
by JOHN ADAMS •
I get a good amount of mail, with all sorts of topics.
Now and again, people will write to me, and ask if I’d ever run for office. Some ask with simple curiosity, others as a rebuke (as though if one would not run for office, then there’s some lack of public-spiritedness to blame).
I’ve never yearned to run for office, but that doesn’t mean I think that political office is a bad idea for others. It’s just that not everyone has to have the same idea: some are politicians, some reporters, some bureaucrats, others are bloggers, volunteers, or activists, and still others committed to a purely private life. I don’t believe that everyone has to be everything, or even try everything.
My view of running for office is like that of William F. Buckley, when he ran for mayor of New York City as a third-party candidate in the ’60s. When asked what he would do if he actually won, Buckley replied that he’d demand a recount.
There’s a second question that comes my way, often with the first question: would I ever debate someone, in town or elsewhere?
Well, why not? I’ve offered these pages for different debates over the years, and those are still-standing offers. At the same time, I’d debate someone in person, recorded or otherwise, if the topic presented itself. That’s the truth of a debate, though: it’s a topic, not a person, that makes all the difference.
As for those whom one might engage in a typical debate, the best opponent is always the strongest possible one. One looks to make a case, to advocate for something, and the best case and strongest advocacy emerge in a debate with a skillful, accomplished opponent.
Some of the most compelling debates are those with two people, at a table with a moderator, simply responding to each other in a give-and-take format. (The 2000 vice-presidential debate between Cheney and Lieberman was a good format of this kind.)
We probably have too few public debates, especially between candidates for office, than we should. If the League of Women Voters didn’t sponsor local debates, there’d be none. We have reason to be grateful for their efforts.
A debate — print, radio, television — needs an interesting topic, an open and challenging format, and the right timing. The new year will offer presidential primaries, Wisconsin recalls, and general elections at all levels next November. Those topics are necessarily the most important, and candidates involved in such contentious pursuits will — legitimately and reasonably — draw (by far) the most attention. One can do more than one thing during a year, but it would be silly to doubt that the most important debates will be between political candidates.
Along the lines of ideas and topics, I’m thinking about opening up comments on more posts, with the same moderation as now (mostly against profanity or trolls). It’s not concern about contrary points of view, but about the timeliness of my own comment moderation, that leaves me uncertain.
There’s an energy from pondering different possibilities that wait in the year ahead. Just one small reason, on top of many profound ones, to love this time of year.
Tyranny
Communists fabricated documents against Walesa
by JOHN ADAMS •
Of course they did. In the run of their atrocities, this was a day’s light work:
Polish investigators say communist authorities fabricated documents that suggested Lech Walesa was a communist collaborator, to try to stop the Solidarity founder being awarded Nobel Peace Prize.
It says everything one would ever need to know that even the regime understood that nothing could ruin a reputation so quickly as being suspected of collaboration with the regime.
Via WQOW.
Free Markets
Three cheers for civilization and free markets this festive season
by JOHN ADAMS •
Happy Christmas:
As you open your gifts this festive season, or tuck into your dinner, take a moment to think about the extent to which free markets have made this possible. Probably, people from all over the globe have been involved in helping you enjoy your day; people you don’t know and don’t need to know, all because of the marvellous workings of free markets.
There is a good chance that some of your gifts travelled by air and sea to reach you; that they were conceived, manufactured and packed by an array of hard-working people in a variety of countries. Other people in several other countries are likely to have worked on providing the raw materials used in making the items you unwrapped. Having all these people from distant countries co-operating to produce goods for your pleasure is one of the great benefits of freer markets and civilisation….
Via Three cheers for civilisation and free markets this festive season – Soapbox | Moneyweb.
Libertarians, Presidential race 2012
Ron Paul Storms Out of CNN Interview Over Newsletter Questions
by JOHN ADAMS •
Libertarian-leaning Ron Paul made a bush-league mistake when he walked out of an interview with CNN. Years ago, Paul published a newsletter under his name in which some racist stories and articles appeared. Paul contends he didn’t really supervise the publication at all, and that he merely lent his name to the newsletter. Perhaps.
If so, why walk away from an interviewer? It’s a bad move: one should never walk out. If anything, one should insist on staying longer, and talking about more things, to compensate for talking about what one contends is a bogus issue.
This was a rookie mistake, from a man whose age and experience leave him anything but a rookie.
(In the end, though, regardless of the day-to-day GOP dramas, I’d be stunned if Gov. Romney were not the GOP nominee.)
Here’s Paul’s unforced error:
Daily Bread
Daily Bread for 12.22.11
by JOHN ADAMS •
Good morning.
For Whitewater, there’s a chance of a dusting of snow this morning, with a daytime high just above freezing. In Santa Fe, they’re also expecting snow (1-2 inches), and temperatures just below freezing.
On this day in 1864, Pres. Lincoln received a present a few days ahead of the twenty-fifth:
On Dec. 22, 1864, during the Civil War, Union Gen. William T. Sherman sent a message to President Lincoln from Georgia, saying, “I beg to present you as a Christmas gift the city of Savannah.”
A market may be free, somewhat free, restricted, or (as a limitation on freedom) manipulated: Rachel Ehrenberg writes about suspicions of market manipulation in Smells Like a Bear Raid.
Two extraordinarily large trading days for Citigroup shares in the fall of 2007 hint that someone may have been manipulating the stock, say analysts who mine financial data using powerful computers and mathematical algorithms.
Researchers from the New England Complex Systems Institute in Cambridge, Mass., were examining stock trading data for the period January 2007 to January 2009 when they noticed two unusually large spikes in volume and other measures related to Citigroup shares. On November 1, 2007, the team noted, the number of borrowed Citigroup shares jumped by 100 million, reaching a value of almost $6 billion. Six days later, a similar number of borrowed shares were returned on a single day, the team reports online December 14 at arXiv.org. The estimated gain for the investors who made the transactions was at least $640 million.
Such extreme events would be expected only once in a few hundred years, says Yaneer Bar-Yam, coauthor of the work. The likelihood of seeing those events six days apart is once in 4 billion years, the researchers’ calculations show.
Unlikely, yes; manipulation’s still in doubt:
Other researchers aren’t so certain that manipulation was at play. The analysis is an interesting case study, says financial economist Ekkehart Boehmer of the EDHEC Business School in Nice, France. But if the Citigroup trades were truly manipulative, the price should have gone back up after the deal was done.
It didn’t. Citigroup’s price kept falling. In fact, Boehmer says the traders would have made 10 times the money by waiting another two months to sell. “We can’t rule out manipulation, but we don’t have evidence of it either,” says Boehmer, who was director of research at the New York Stock Exchange from 2001 to 2003.
It’s curious, but a curiosity isn’t proof.
On this day in 1882, the first known use of electric lights on a Christmas tree:
An inventive New Yorker finds a brilliant application for electric lights and becomes the first person to use them as Christmas tree decorations.
Edward H. Johnson, who toiled for Thomas Edison’s Illumination Company and later became a company vice president, used 80 small red, white and blue electric bulbs, strung together along a single power cord, to light the Christmas tree in his New York home. Some sources credit Edison himself with being the first to use electric lights as Christmas decorations, when he strung them around his laboratory in 1880.
Sticking them on the tree was Johnson’s idea, though. It was a mere three years after Edison had demonstrated that light bulbs were practical at all.
The idea of replacing the Christmas tree’s traditional wax candles — which had been around since the mid-17th century — with electric lights didn’t, umm, catch fire right away. Although the stringed lights enjoyed a vogue with the wealthy and were being mass-produced as early as 1890, they didn’t become popular in humbler homes until a couple of decades into the 20th century.
From there, we made the journey to here:
Federal Government, Holiday
Remy: Grandma Got Indefinitely Detained (A Very TSA Christmas)
by JOHN ADAMS •
I saw that Veronique de Rugy recommended this video, and a solid recommendation it is:
Politics, Recall
Sen. Majority Leader Fitzgerald’s 12.19.11 Open Office
by JOHN ADAMS •
One should expect a few things of a politician, and among them one would hope to find honesty, commitment to principle, hard work, and a comfort and ease around his or her constituents.
There’s a video of a recall organizer and potential candidate, Lori Compas, at a town hall meeting of the state senator she hopes to replace, Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald.
First the video, then a few comments on the scene:
The video. It’s of below-average quality. Those attending could and should do a better job of recording these meetings. More than one videographer would be a good idea. (It sounds as though Compas has more than one supporter in the audience.)
Fitzgerald’s seating. This is apparently an ‘office hours’ session for Fitzgerald, and he weakly and defensively sits behind a desk. I’d almost think this was a joke, and someone seated him that way to put him at a disadvantage. There should be no table between Fitzgerald and his constituents. He should either be in a chair, or standing and walking among them.
He looks like he’s a principal at a school’s administrative hearing — not at a congenial, relaxed meeting of a legislator and his constituents. These gentlemen need to be comfortable in crowds. (In the same way, Paul Ryan shouldn’t go to a Labor Day parade and expect people to refrain from asking employment-related questions.)
Next to Fitzgerald at the table is an older woman who looks so stern and frumpy one would think that she was an intentional representation of a severe schoolmarm.
Fitzgerald’s attire. There’s nothing wrong with what he’s wearing, but he should speak without his coat – shirt and tie is sufficient. If he wants to wear the coat into the room, then he should take it off once the meeting begins.
Fitzgerald’s manner. He smiles nervously, and speaks without any particular command. There’s no reason for him to have and hold a water bottle. Fine to take a drink, now and then, but he holds it as though it were a teddy bear.
Compas’s Attire. I’m not sure if she thought about what to wear, or this is how she normally dresses – either way, she’s dressed well for the occasion. The black jacket and turtleneck, with hair pulled up, remind viewers that she’s apparently slender and fit. She looks athletic, in a state that offers diverse outdoor adventures (but where only a minority of middle-aged residents seem fit.) A fussier woman would have dressed up for this occasion; she’s dressed appropriately.
Compas is easily a more attractive woman than Fitzgerald a man. Her simple choice of attire only accentuates the difference between them.
Compas’s manner. She holds her own, against an incumbent legislator and a leader of the GOP. She’s persistent, but not overbearing.
I don’t think that Compas can unseat Fitzgerald, but it says much about how rough-around-the-edges the statehouse GOP leaders are that she handles Fitzgerald so well as she does.
Libertarians, Presidential race 2012
POLITICO: Gary Johnson to drop out of GOP primary to run as Libertarian
by JOHN ADAMS •
As expected, former Gov. Johnson’s preparing to run as a Libertarian. If he gets the party’s nomination, he will be the second GOP politician in a row to run as the LP nominee. (Bob Barr was a former GOP Congressman who ran as a right-libertarian in ’08, and Johnson’s a former governor who’d run as a left-libertarian.)
It’s a good thing that the party’s able to attract former state or federal officeholders, and a sign that the LP (and not just libertarianism) is becoming more mainstream.
From POLITICO:
Gary Johnson will quit the Republican primaries and seek the Libertarian Party nomination instead, POLITICO has learned.
The former two-term New Mexico governor, whose campaign for the GOP nomination never caught fire, will make the announcement at a press conference in Santa Fe on Dec. 28. Johnson state directors will be informed of his plans on a campaign conference call Tuesday night, a Johnson campaign source told POLITICO.
The move has been expected for weeks — Johnson had run a New Hampshire-centric effort that never got him past a blip in the polls. He appeared at only two nationally televised debates, and only one in which other major candidates took part.
Daily Bread
Daily Bread for 12.21.11
by JOHN ADAMS •
Good morning.
There’s a slight chance of rain or snow in Whitewater today, with a high of forty-degrees. In Nashville, there’s also a chance of showers, but with a high temperature of sixty-one.
In 1879, a day of particular, industrial tragedy for Wisconsin, as the Wiscosnin Historical Society recalls:
1879 – Fire Destroys Phillip Brewing Company
On this date fire destroyed the Phillip Brewing Company’s malthouse, grain elevators and office building in Milwaukee. [Source: American Breweriana Association]
We’ve managed to carry on, just fine.
Each year, the time between Thanksgiving and Christmas brings a few blockbuster, big-budget films. Fans learn of these offerings long beforehand, and eagerly await their arrival. Perhaps Tintin is one of those films this year. It seems the perfect adventure for a holiday film:
Google’s puzzle for today is straightforward: “Which is longer, the largest cruise ship now in service or the largest aircraft carrier now in service?”
Setting aside the answer, wouldn’t one want a world where the cruise ship was larger? Wouldn’t one prefer a world where one wouldn’t need aircraft carriers at all? That’s not the world we have, but wouldn’t it be the world for which one would hope? more >>
Foreign Affairs, Religion
The Continuing Global Growth of Christianity
by JOHN ADAMS •
There’s a distinction between separation of church & state and secularization, although the distinction isn’t always grasped. America and France both have a separation of church from state, but France is the more secular society. Religion is more visible in American civil society, compared with France (if anything, that’s a considerable understatement).
There’s much worry among the religious about secularization in America, but I’d guess it’s unnecessary worry: America is and will remain a predominantly religious country.
Beyond America, this is even more true: religion, and particularly Christianity (yes, Christianity), is flourishing. Historians and demographers have noted this trend, among them Philip Jenkins, and Walter Russell Mead writes about it today in his fine blog:
A new report from the invaluable Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life, the most important source for information on religion in today’s world, will make a lot of people unhappy. The report looks at religious belief worldwide and finds that Christianity in the last one hundred years grew to become the world’s most widespread and diverse religion as well as the largest. Roughly one third of the world’s almost seven billion people are (or at least say they are) Christian. The second largest religion, Islam, claims about one fourth of the world’s population.
The demographic trends favor Christian expansion in Asia and Africa, and Mead speculates on the influence that expansion may have on democratization and human rights.
See Walter Russell Mead’s Via Meadia Blog.
For the report, see Global Christianity – A Report on the Size and Distribution of the World’ s Christian Population.
City, Poverty
Whitewater’s Decade of Child Poverty
by JOHN ADAMS •
The only way to make an ill person truly and permanently better is to see her condition for what it is; genuine recovery requires an honest diagnosis. Despite my doubts about their program, I respect Roosevelt’s New Dealers’ for their willingness to call a problem a problem. If they had lived to see contemporary Whitewater, they would have been shocked and furious. (See, along these lines, On the Upcoming 2011 Whitewater, Wisconsin Municipal Budget.)
From 2003 to 2010, the Whitewater area has grown poorer, a decline in economic health that threatens personal health, and brings us yet closer to a permanent underclass.
This truth is inescapable, and has hit already-vulnerable residents hardest. In 2003, 9.2% of the children in the Whitewater area lived in poverty. In 2007, that number was 9.9%, and in 2010, the number of impoverished children had soared to 16.6%. (See, data in spreadsheet format.)
These are children, aged five to seventeen, who face hardship each day. One of every six children in the Whitewater area lives this way. This proportion might be even worse if one were to add children under five.
Far from economic gains, the actual circumstances of young residents in our community are worse than earlier in the decade.
Hundreds of Wisconsin communities are doing better than we are.
In fact, local child poverty increased even from 2003 to 2007, a time of economic growth for America. While America was gaining, long before the Great Recession, Whitewater was already slipping behind.
There’s a way to reverse this dark trend, one that will produce greater opportunity for all our residents.
Drastically cut or eliminate restrictions and fees on businesses, cut sharply from so-called leadership posts, and return the money to taxpayers or as services in emergency poverty assistance. At a minimum, hundreds of thousands should be cut or transferred this way, each year, until government is properly limited and responsible to actual needs.
We will not be made prosperous — and for some, the problem isn’t unrealized prosperity but actual hunger — in the myriad empty ways Whitewater’s bureaucrats have tried repetitively.
We’ve grown poorer despite (often because of) big-ticket federal grants, Tech Parks, government-run renewal schemes, ersatz national and international awards, showy celebrations, dishonest and dodgy community surveys, the slanted use of statistics, special breaks and exceptions for insiders, rights violations against workers new to the community, and frequent bumbling through silly project after project.
These problems are not the fault of the many thousands of common people of the area; a few selfish and self-promoting municipal bureaucrats and their apologists have held Whitewater back, and have made her poorer than she would have otherwise been.
Yet, for it all, they will have a legacy, those who strutted about so proudly during these recent years. Prosperity will remember them as the feckless and fumbling clique that presided over a seventy-seven percent increase in child poverty — to one-in-six Whitewater-area children — in just seven years.