Understandably, the best outcome for any public body is to have good candidates, who become good incumbents, who then produce good policy. This should be obvious to anyone: candidates, residents, bloggers, etc.
A next-best outcome would be the opportunity to draw clear contrasts between good policy and bad, so much the better to illustrate alternatives.
When that next-best outcome is so predictable – from the greatest possible distance – it’s that much better.
Other than the rising of the sun each morning, there could be nothing in town more predictable than that the Whitewater Unified School Board seats would be uncontested, and that Jim Stewart would be running for one of them. I’ve previously written about Mr. Stewart’s 2015 candidacy.
As a policy matter, just about anyone else would have been a better choice than Mr. Stewart; as a matter of drawing contrasts between good policy and bad, his tenure will offer a three years’ long opportunity to do so. (A cynical blogger – and I’m not – would have entitled this post Christmas Comes Again, in January.)
Big-spending but anti-labor is probably the worst policy position for Whitewater, but a political legacy of that sort offers the next-best thing for others to draw clear distinctions between good policy and bad.
There are difficult choices ahead for the Whitewater Schools (and other districts), although they can be managed.
What circumstances don’t offer in candidates they will in commentary.