FREE WHITEWATER

Whitewater’s Common Council Votes to Fund a Vendor Study

WGTB logo PNG 112x89 Post 9 in a series.


Whitewater’s Common Council Votes to Fund a Vendor Study from John Adams on Vimeo.

In this post, I’ll look at the Council’s decision to pay Trane at least $70,000, and up to approximately $150,000, so that Trane could fund its own feasibility study of a digester energy project for Whitewater.

(Every question in this series has a unique number, assigned chronologically based on when it was asked.  All the questions from When Green Turns Brown can be found in the Question Bin.  Today’s questions begin with No. 91.)

I’ve been asked two questions that I’ll answer before beginning. First, the questions in the series have a unique number so that I or others may refer to them, specifically. That’s useful to me for compiling formal requests to the city, derived from this series of posts, and organizing a later, composite work in a different form.

Second, the video clips to which I am referring in these posts are longer than the more concise, quoted segments that I will use in a short-form video account. Some of the claims these gentlemen have made are, to say the least, noteworthy. Later in the series, but before a finished work, I will begin to use shorter clips to illustrate & highlight specific claims that vendors, City Manager Clapper, Wastewater Superintendent Reel, or others have made.

91. Wastewater Superintendent Reel (Reel) contends that the purpose of the project is to realize energy savings. At the Council meeting prior, Black & Veatch’s representative contended that the principal economic gain of the project is tipping fees (that is, money waste haulers pay to truck and dump other cities’ unwanted waste into Whitewater). (See, Question Bin, No. 85.) Shouldn’t Reel concede that the principal plan is a dumping plan? Isn’t calling it an energy savings plan simply a way to latch onto a more favorable-sounding public-relations pitch?

92. Reel says that dealing with ‘biosolids’ has been added to the feasibility study (rather than just liquids) for ‘clarification.’ Why was that entire portion – omitted in a prior draft of the deal? Does Reel think that solids from a digester are a minor matter? What does this say about the thoroughness of the draft agreement developed weeks earlier?

93. Reel says that “this opportunity” came on us “pretty quickly.” Why does Reel think that the opportunity arrived quickly? If so, how did it arrive so quickly?

94. Doesn’t Reel’s own 12.3.13 presentation to Council, listing previous, failed iterations of this same idea, show that there’s nothing that’s been quick or need be urgent about this?

95. Reel confirms that he met with a larger waste hauler (that would dump waste into Whitewater’s digester from other cities that didn’t want it) on 1.29.14. Who was that waste hauler? Why doesn’t he mention that waste hauler’s name?

96. How can residents of the city properly evaluate the project if a city bureaucrat withholds the waste hauler’s name? Is part of Whitewater’s fiscal, economic, and environmental future to be shaped by a single wastewater superintendent’s lack of candor top the very public that pays his compensation?

97. Reel says that the unnamed waste hauler with whom he spoke hauls one-hundred million (100,000,000) gallons of waste per year. How much of that would Reel want directed to Whitewater?

98. Reel says that Whitewater is within the “geographic range” of that waste hauler. What’s that range? Why doesn’t Reel say? Where does that hauler get its waste? Why doesn’t Reel say?

99. Reel also says he received another letter of interest, from another waste hauler. Again, why won’t he speak that waste hauler’s name? Does Reel believe he owes a duty of confidentiality to the waste hauler? If he does, then does he believe that duty of confidentiality to a large commercial business trump a duty of candor to Whitewater’s residents?

100. Reel contends that he is not sure that, if Whitewater does not proceed now, it would have the same level of supposed expertise it has now (Trane, Black & Veatch, Donohue). Why does he think that, that is, if this project should be so valuable by his account, why could Whitewater not find capable vendors at a later time?

101. Reel says a possible discrepancy between parts of the draft agreement in question is “just a language thing.” What does that response say about Reel’s understanding of, and respect for, large-sum contractual agreements?

102. What is Reel’s background, if any, in negotiating large-sum contracts previously?

103. How is it that Trane’s representative (“Rachel”), who Reel claims was responsible for the document of agreement, admits that there was a typo only after someone on Council points it out to her? How is it that she doesn’t even know whether the agreement would allow Whitewater to see preliminary study data before deciding whether to proceed with a second phase of the study?

104. Watching Rachel’s responses, can anyone have confidence in her ability?

105. Why would anyone accept Reel’s assurance that the city will get information apart from the actual agreement language on which the city is voting?

106. Reel contends that there are projects like this in other cities. Why does he not show how his project is similar to the other places that he mentions?

107. Councilmember Dr. Ken Kidd contends that “clearly it is better to be early in the game than late in the game.” Why does he think so (that is, why does he think that it is – clearly – better to be an early adopter on a proposal with fiscal, economic, and environmental impact)?

Original Common Council Discussion, 2.4.14
Agenda http://www.whitewater-wi.gov/images/stories/agendas/common_council/2014/2014_2-4_Full_Packet_a.pdf
Minutes http://www.whitewater-wi.gov/images/stories/minutes/common_council/2014/2014-02-04.pdf
Video https://vimeo.com/86074358

WHEN GREEN TURNS BROWN: Mondays @ 10 AM, here on FREE WHITEWATER.

Memorial Day 2015

ARLINGTON, Va. — Darrell Stafford inspected a freshly dug grave at Arlington National Cemetery recently and nodded. The burial plot, 5 feet by 10 feet, was ready for the coming ceremony. It was just one of 28 funerals that he would help oversee that day.

During his 32 years at the cemetery, Mr. Stafford has witnessed thousands of burials, and he has approached each one with military precision.

“You see a 22-year-old mother at a grave site who doesn’t have a husband anymore with her little kid,” he said. He has also seen veterans with missing limbs visit comrades’ graves. “In this business you see it day in and day out, and you can’t just start to think that this is routine.”

….Mr. Stafford, 56, manages a team of some 20 caretakers who conduct the burials of both coffins and cremated remains. A tall man with a graying beard and gruff voice, he said his team’s attention to detail was vital, whether for the burial of a private or a general….

“It’s a place of heroes, in my opinion,” Mr. Stafford said. Later, he added, “This is for the guys who earned it.”

Via Before a Soldier’s Rest, a Panoply of Details @ New York Times.

Daily Bread for 5.25.15

Good morning, Whitewater.

Memorial Day in Whitewater will see thunderstorms in the morning, with a high of eighty-one for the day. Sunrise is 5:22 and sunset 8:20, for 14h 58m 15s of daytime. The moon is a waxing crescent with 47.9% of its visible disk illuminated.

On this day in 1977, Star Wars opens.

Here’s the original teaser trailer:

Puzzability begins a new series entitled, Cheese Filling:

This Week’s Game — May 25-29
Cheese Filling
We’ve got string cheese on the menu all week. For each day, we’ll give you three clues, each of which leads to a word. The answers to two of those clues, when placed together in the right order, have the name of a cheese spanning the gap between the answers. When the cheese’s name is removed, the remaining letters, in order, spell the answer to the day’s remaining clue. The clues are presented in random order.
Example:
Affleck’s Good Will Hunting costar; river of South America; astound
Answer:
AMAZEDAMON (Damon, Amazon, amaze; the cheese is Edam)
What to Submit:
Submit just the full string of letters, with the cheese in the middle (as “AMAZEDAMON” in the example), for your answer.
Monday, May 25
Shoreside platform; laser printer cartridge contents; stamen’s counterpart

Daily Bead for 5.24.15

Good morning, Whitewater.

Sunday in Whitewater will be rainy, with thunderstorms, and a high of sixty-five. Sunrise is 5:22 and sunset 8:20, for 14h 56m 38s of daytime. The moon is a waxing crescent with 38.6% of its visible disk illuminated.

Friday’s FW poll asked whether, in the effort to save endangered species, a priority should go to pandas (as a high-profile, sharp-looking animal). A majority of respondents (60%) said that we should not prioritize panda survival, but that we should develop a different set of standards.

 

On this day in 1883, the Brooklyn Bridge opens to traffic:

The bridge—originally referred to as the New York and Brooklyn Bridge and as the East River Bridge[citation needed]— was opened for use on May 24, 1883. The opening ceremony was attended by several thousand people and many ships were present in the East Bay for the occasion. President Chester A. Arthur and Mayor Franklin Edson crossed the bridge to celebratory cannon fire and were greeted by Brooklyn Mayor Seth Low when they reached the Brooklyn-side tower.[26] Arthur shook hands with Washington Roebling at the latter’s home, after the ceremony. Roebling was unable to attend the ceremony (and in fact rarely visited the site again), but held a celebratory banquet at his house on the day of the bridge opening. Further festivity included the performance of a band, gunfire from ships, and a fireworks display.[27]

On that first day, a total of 1,800 vehicles and 150,300 people crossed what was then the only land passage between Manhattan and Brooklyn. Emily Warren Roebling was the first to cross the bridge. The bridge’s main span over the East River is 1,595 feet 6 inches (486.3 m). The bridge cost US$15.5 million in 1883 dollars (about US$379,661,000 in today’s dollars) to build and an estimated number of 27 people died during its construction.[28]

On May 30, 1883, six days after the opening, a rumor that the Bridge was going to collapse caused a stampede, which was responsible for at least twelve people being crushed and killed.[29] On May 17, 1884, P. T. Barnum helped to squelch doubts about the bridge’s stability—while publicizing his famous circus—when one of his most famous attractions, Jumbo, led a parade of 21 elephants over the Brooklyn Bridge.[30][31][32][33]

Sixteen years later, in 1899, Thomas Edison’s company filmed a crossing from Brooklyn into New York:

New Brooklyn to New York via Brooklyn Bridge, no. 2. The entire trip from Brooklyn to New York.

Daily Bread for 5.23.15

Good morning, Whitewater.

Saturday in town will be mostly sunny, with a high of seventy-seven.  Sunrise is 5:24 and sunset 8:19, for 14h 54m 57s of daytime.

On this day in 1934, bank robbers and members of a murderous gang Bonnie and Clyde find that their vicious crime spree comes to an end:

Bonnie Elizabeth Parker (October 1, 1910 – May 23, 1934) and Clyde Chestnut Barrow a.k.a. Clyde Champion Barrow[1] (March 24, 1909 – May 23, 1934) were American outlaws and robbers from the Dallas area who traveled the central United States with their gang during the Great Depression. At times, the gang included Buck Barrow, Blanche Barrow, Raymond Hamilton, W. D. Jones, Joe Palmer,Ralph Fults, and Henry Methvin. Their exploits captured the attention of the American public during the “Public Enemy Era“, between 1931 and 1935. Though known today for his dozen-or-so bank robberies, Barrow preferred to rob small stores or rural gas stations. The gang is believed to have killed at least nine police officers and several civilians. The couple were eventually ambushed and killed near the town of Sailes, Louisiana, in Bienville Parish, Louisiana, by law officers.

On this day in 1908, a Nobel Prize winner is born in Wisconsin:

1908 – John Bardeen Born
On this date double Nobel Prize winner John Bardeen was born in Madison, Wisconsin. Bardeen attended high school in Madison and went on to study Electrical Engineering at the University of Wisconsin where he received a B.S. in 1928 and an M.S. in 1929.

After working at Gulf Research Laboratories, Bardeen returned to graduate studies in 1933 at Princeton in mathematical physics. Bardeen, along with Walter H. Brattain and William Shockley were awarded the 1956 Nobel Prize in Physics for “investigations on semiconductors and the discovery of the transistor effect.”

In 1957, Bardeen and two colleagues, L.N. Cooper and J.R. Schrieffer, proposed the first successful explanation of superconductivity.

He shared the 1972 Nobel Prize with L.N. Cooper and J.R. Schrieffer for the theory of superconductivity. He received the distinguished Lomonosov Award of the Soviet Academy of Sciences in 1987. In 1990, Bardeen was one of 11 recipients of the Third Century Award honoring exceptional contributions to American creativity. He was also named by Life Magazine as one of the “100 most influential people of the century.” Dr. Bardeen died on January 30, 1991. [Source: Nobelprize.org]

Friday Catblogging: ‘My Garbage Cat Wakes Me Up at 3 AM Every Day’

That’s not a description of my sweet cat, of course. Game designer Will Herring has a challenging feline, so he created a video game in which players take the role of a cat who wakes its owner each night, by meowing and crying all the time or kneading with its “dumb little paws.” As the cat irritates its owner, the owner’s sleep meter runs down, until the owner admits defeat.

Visit My Garbage Cat Wakes Me Up at 3 AM Every Day to play the game.

Friday Poll: A Priority for Pandas?


Giant pandas might go extinct, but so might many other creatures that are less attractive, but would be cheaper to save. The video below, from MinuteEarth, describes the choices humans might have to make between species. (MinuteEarth is a science and conservation site, and they’ve nothing against pandas, so to speak. They’re simply asking about human priorities between threatened species.)

What do you think?

Daily Bread for 5.22.15

Good morning, Whitewater.

Friday in town will be sunny with a high of seventy. Sunrise is 5:24 and sunset 8:18, for 14h 53m 13s of daytime. The moon is a waxing crescent with 20.3% of its visible disk illuminated.

It’s the birthday of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle:

Sir Arthur Ignatius Conan Doyle KStJ, DL (22 May 1859 – 7 July 1930) was a Scottish writer and physician, most noted for his fictional stories about the detective Sherlock Holmes, which are generally considered milestones in the field of crime fiction.

He is also known for writing the fictional adventures of a second character he invented, Professor Challenger, and for popularising the mystery of the Mary Celeste.[1] He was a prolific writer whose other works include fantasy and science fiction stories, plays, romances, poetry, non-fiction and historical novels….

Doyle’s attitude towards his most famous creation was ambivalent.[26] In November 1891 he wrote to his mother: “I think of slaying Holmes … and winding him up for good and all. He takes my mind from better things.” His mother responded, “You won’t! You can’t! You mustn’t!”.[30] In an attempt to deflect publishers’ demands for more Holmes stories, he raised his price to a level intended to discourage them, but found they were willing to pay even the large sums he asked.[26] As a result, he became one of the best-paid authors of his time.

In December 1893, to dedicate more of his time to his historical novels, Doyle had Holmes and Professor Moriarty plunge to their deaths together down the Reichenbach Falls in the story “The Final Problem“. Public outcry, however, led him to feature Holmes in 1901 in the novel The Hound of the Baskervilles.

In 1903, Doyle published his first Holmes short story in ten years, The Adventure of the Empty House, in which it was explained that only Moriarty had fallen; but since Holmes had other dangerous enemies—especially Colonel Sebastian Moran—he had arranged to also be perceived as dead. Holmes was ultimately featured in a total of 56 short stories – the last published in 1927 – and four novels by Doyle, and has since appeared in many novels and stories by other authors.

Jane Stanford compares some of Moriarty’s characteristics to those of the Fenian John O’Connor Power. ‘The Final Problem’ was published the year the Second Home Rule Bill passed through the House of Commons. ‘The Valley of Fear’ was serialised in 1914, the year Home Rule, the Government of Ireland Act (18 September) was placed on the Statute Book.[31]

Here is the final game in Puzzability‘s series of the week, Prhymetime:

This Week’s Game — May 18-22
Prhymetime
For your viewing pleasure this week, we’re airing a series series every day. Each day’s clues lead to a series of answer words that, in order, rhyme with the title of an Emmy-winning TV series (comedy or drama).
Example:
Pretending to be sick; tartan pattern
Answer:
Breaking Bad (faking; plaid)
What to Submit:
Submit the series title and the rhyming words (as “Breaking Bad (faking; plaid)” in the example) for your answer.
Friday, May 22
Sirloin or ribeye; mausoleum, for example; U.S. Marines group; golf assistant

Restaurant Review: Fin & Hooves

Fin & Hooves is the restaurant at the Whitewater Country Club, on Highway 89 just outside of Whitewater. 

Prior to this review, I had not visited the Whitewater Country Club in years, and for dining prior to the opening of Fin & Hooves, I would have had no reason to visit.  (I’m not a golfer, although I respect the sport and follow prominent tournaments.)  Quite simply, the Whitewater Country Club in its prior form offered nothing adequate for dining or atmosphere. 

That’s not true, now: Fin & Hooves gives the entire venue a needed – and significant – boost.  I visited three times for this review, and will visit again both for a follow-up review and likely on other occasions simply for my own enjoyment. 

This is one of Chef Tyler Sailsbery’s three establishments nearby (The Black Sheep & Casual Joe’s being the other two), and I was not disappointed to find that his commitment to a proper meal and a congenial atmosphere was present here (as I’ve found at The Black Sheep). 

He’s taken a property that served poor food in a decrepit dining room and transformed the dining experience of both food and atmosphere. 

This review is the composite of three visits (a late lunch, an early dinner, and Sunday brunch).  So we’re clear: food, service, and atmosphere all matter, and while they are integrated as a combined experience, I’ll suggest that it’s impossible to enjoy a restaurant that serves poor food.  So, however combined, quality of the meal is paramount. 

The most important part of air travel is that the plane stays in the air; the most important part of dining is that one receives good preparations. 

The food at Fin & Hooves is easily recommended in choices and desirability.  It’s simply delicious.  This is a New American cuisine, a favorite of mine, with a moderately-sized lunch and dinner menu that offers a combination of appetizers (3), soups (2), salads (3), burgers (3), two chicken selections, and cheesecake.  A separate Sunday brunch menu now offers just under a dozen selections, among them omelets (3), skillets (2), sandwiches (2), and traditional plates (3) of pancakes, French toast, or eggs.  

The foods used throughout the menu are, I think, locally sourced, and that seems to include meats from nearby Sorg’s.  Local sourcing is not a favor to other merchants – it’s a benefit to patrons dining at Fin & Hooves.  Fin & Hooves gives diners the local elements they deserve, avoiding the many problems with freshness or quality (especially of fish) that patrons otherwise might face. 

Of my particular favorites from among my visits was a salmon omelet that was among the best breakfast preparations of salmon that I’ve ever had: fresh salmon of the right color and soft texture, breaking apart on one’s fork slowly, neither crumbling immediately nor unyielding to that utensil.  A portion of feta within was evident but not overpowering, onions caramelized only lightly. 

For a lunch visit, I’d recommend the seafood chowder.  It’s served as a moderate portion, but even twice as much, in a larger offering, would be welcome.  That’s not the intention of the offering now (it’s meant to be paired with a contrasting selection), but on its own it is light enough to enjoy, perhaps with a small portion of salad as an accompaniment. 

The burgers are certainly ample (about eight ounces), seasoned properly, and suitable for eating even without a bun. 

The sweet pepper chicken, served over potatoes, is a mixture on the plate of a light element (chicken) with a heavier one (mashed potatoes prepared so that they’re thicker than one might have had elsewhere, giving them a more substantial texture).

Looking around the dining room (two rooms, one near the bar and one with a view of the course outside), I remembered not even a trace of the prior establishment’s disappointing furnishings.  (I did notice a large mirror in one of the rooms was cracked, but there’s a good chance the placement is in jaunty defiance of superstition, a declaration that broken glass doesn’t decide one’s fate.  It doesn’t, of course.) 

All three visits were, for me, happy ones.  Yet, on one occasion it was noticeable that the young staff seemed concerned about something else that happened recently, before my arrival, or once out-of-earshot while I was there.  On one occasion, I saw that a party nearby seemed upset with their orders, although I don’t know why. 

It’s my guess that this staff has not had time to settle into a steady, mostly unflappable response to patrons’ concerns or unexpected errors.  When they spoke with me on one occasion, my waiters and waitresses were polite, friendly, but almost apologetic over something that must have happened earlier.  They seemed overly-worried about my reaction and that of other patrons, as though diners might be upset or impatient.   

They had no reason to be worried over any part of my experience, or of those with me when I visited, with this exception: being overly-worried without reason is, itself, a distraction from an experience. 

I’ll be back, to enjoy the food, atmosphere, and to visit to see how the servers are growing into their roles.

It’s quite a feat, even now, to have transformed this location so positively. 

Recommended.

LOCATION: N9035 Wisconsin 89,  Whitewater, WI 53190.  (262) 473-3305, (tables), (262) 458-2227 (events).

Online:
http://www.finandhooves.com/
https://www.facebook.com/finandhooves

OPEN:

Closed Monday

Tuesday 11-9pm

Wednesday 11-9pm

Thursday 11-9pm

Friday 11-10pm

Saturday 11-9pm

Sunday Brunch 8:30-2:30

PRICES: Main dish and a drink for about $12-20, depending on selection.

RESERVATIONS: Available.

DRINKS: Full bar, soda, water.

SOUND: Quiet. 

SERVICE: Attentive, friendly, but a bit overly-concerned about patrons’ reactions (where there was no reason for that concern).

VISITS: Three (late lunch, early dinner, Sunday brunch).

RATING: Recommended 3.25 of 4.

GoldStarGoldStarGoldStarGoldStar25

RATING SCALE: From one to four stars, representing the full experience of food, atmosphere, service, and pricing.

INDEPENDENCE: This review is delivered without financial or other connection to the establishment or its owner. The dining experience was that of an ordinary patron, without notice to the staff or requests for special consideration.

Daily Bread for 5.21.15

Good morning, Whitewater.

Thursday in town will be partly cloudy with a high of sixty-nine. Sunrise is 5:25 and sunset 8:17, for 14h 51m 26s of daytime. The moon is a waxing crescent with 12.5% of its visible disk illuminated.

Whitewater’s Landmarks Commission meets at 6 PM (for an appreciation dinner) and the city’s Police & Fire Commission at 6:30 PM.

 

On this day in 1927, Charles Lindbergh completes a solo flight across the Atlantic:

Six well-known aviators had already lost their lives in pursuit of the Orteig Prize [to be awarded to the pilot of the first successful nonstop flight made in either direction between New York City and Paris] when Lindbergh took off from Roosevelt Field on his successful attempt in the early morning of Friday, May 20, 1927. Burdened by its heavy load of 450 U.S. gallons (1,704 liters) of gasoline weighing about 2,710 lb (1,230 kg), and hampered by a muddy, rain-soaked runway, Lindbergh’sWright Whirlwind-powered monoplane gained speed very slowly as it made its 7:52 am (07:52) takeoff run, but its J-5C radial engine still proved powerful enough to allow the Spirit to clear the telephone lines at the far end of the field “by about twenty feet [six meters] with a fair reserve of flying speed”.[52] Over the next 33.5 hours, he and the Spirit—which Lindbergh always jointly referred to as “WE”—faced many challenges, including skimming over both storm clouds at 10,000 ft (3,000 m) and wave tops at as low at 10 ft (3.0 m), fighting icing, flying blind through fog for several hours, and navigating only by the stars (whenever visible), and dead reckoning before landing at Le Bourget Airport at 10:22 pm (22:22) on Saturday, May 21.[53] The airfield was not marked on his map and Lindbergh knew only that it was some seven miles northeast of the city. He initially mistook the airfield for some large industrial complex with bright lights spreading out in all directions. The lights were, in fact, the headlights of tens of thousands of cars all driven by eager spectators now caught in “the largest traffic jam in Parisian history.”[54]

A crowd estimated at 150,000 spectators stormed the field, dragged Lindbergh out of the cockpit, and literally carried him around above their heads for “nearly half an hour”. While some damage was done to the Spirit (especially to the fine linen, silver-painted fabric covering on the fuselage) by souvenir hunters, both Lindbergh and the Spirit were eventually “rescued” from the mob by a group of French military fliers, soldiers, and police, who took them both to safety in a nearby hangar.[55] From that moment on, life would never again be the same for the previously little-known former U.S. Air Mail pilot who, by his successful flight, had achieved virtually instantaneous—and lifelong—world fame.[56]

Today is also the day that a record for a paper airplane is set, in Wisconsin:

1985 – Distance Record Set for Paper Airplane

On this date Tony Feltch of Wisconsin set the world record for longest distance flown by a paper airplane. Feltch’s airplane, launched at the La Crosse Center, flew 193 feet. [Source: Paper Aircraft Association]

Here’s the Thursday game in Puzzability‘s Prhymetime series:

This Week’s Game — May 18-22
Prhymetime
For your viewing pleasure this week, we’re airing a series series every day. Each day’s clues lead to a series of answer words that, in order, rhyme with the title of an Emmy-winning TV series (comedy or drama).
Example:
Pretending to be sick; tartan pattern
Answer:
Breaking Bad (faking; plaid)
What to Submit:
Submit the series title and the rhyming words (as “Breaking Bad (faking; plaid)” in the example) for your answer.
Thursday, May 21
Feather pen; break the rules in order to win; vacation on a ship