FREE WHITEWATER

Militarized Policing Primer

From the Cato Institute, links to articles and a podcast that describe the dangers of militarized policing:

The clampdown in Ferguson highlights the dangers of our drift toward paramilitary policing, as well as the broader trend of law-enforcement lawlessness documented by Cato’s National Police Misconduct Reporting Project.

“Police Militarization in Ferguson — and Your Town,” by Walter Olson.

“Police Misconduct: The Assault on Civil Liberties,” by Tim Lynch.

“Rise of the Warrior Cop: The Militarization of America’s Police Forces,” by Radley Balko.

“Overkill: The Rise of Paramilitary Police Raids in America,” by Radley Balko.

“Homeland Security Grants Subsidize Dystopia,” by Gene Healy

PODCAST: “The Reality of Militarized Cops,” featuring Walter Olson.

Posted earlier @ Daily Adams.

Friday Poll: Hysterical humans or furious felines?


There have been two stories this year about cats that have allegedly trapped their owners in a room, forcing those people to call the police for assistance. Most recently, to my knowledge, is a call for assistance in Chula Vista, CA (“California women call police over cat’s furry fury”):

Chula Vista police tell KGTV-TV (http://bit.ly/1mGRoqI) a woman and her adult daughter called 911 Tuesday to say they were stuck in the bedroom because their cat “Cuppy” was in a rage and wouldn’t let them leave.

Police say such matters are usually left to animal control, but officers decided to help out on a quiet night. They say eventually the cat walked out on its own.

Neighbor Karen Yarger says the cat has been a family pet for years but is unpredictable.

A Portland, Oregon, family went through a similar ordeal, when their cat Lux attacked a baby and boxed his owners in a bedroom.

So, what do you think: hysterical humans or furious felines?

Daily Bread for 8.15.14

Good morning, Whitewater.

Friday in town will be mostly sunny with a high of seventy-eight.

On this day in 1969, Woodstock began:

The Woodstock Music & Art Fair—informally, the Woodstock Festival or simply Woodstock—was a music festival, billed as “An Aquarian Exposition: 3 Days of Peace & Music”. It was held at Max Yasgur‘s 600-acre (240 ha; 0.94 sq mi) dairy farm in the Catskills near the hamlet of White Lake in the town of Bethel, New York, from August 15 to 18, 1969. Bethel, in Sullivan County, is 43 miles (69 km) southwest of the town of Woodstock, New York, in adjoining Ulster County.

During the sometimes rainy weekend, 32 acts performed outdoors before an audience of 400,000 young people.[2] It is widely regarded as a pivotal moment in popular music history. Rolling Stone listed it as one of the 50 Moments That Changed the History of Rock and Roll.[3]

The festival is also widely considered to be the definitive nexus for the larger counterculture generation.[4][5]

The event was captured in the 1970 documentary movie Woodstock, an accompanying soundtrack album, and Joni Mitchell‘s song “Woodstock“, which commemorated the event and became a major hit for Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young.

Embedded below is a 30-year anniversary documentary as part of the VH1 Behind the Music series:

Google-a-Day asks a question about literature:

What Tom Wolfe novel is named after a 1497 ritual that Savonarola led involving mirrors?

Innovation Center Offers a Seminar on How to Go Out of Business

Nutty, but true: the Innovation Center – the Disappointment that Keeps on Disappointing™ – is apparently offering a program entitled, “What you Will Need to Know When You are Ready (or Not) to Sell Your Business.”

It’s part of – wait for it – the Center’s ‘Elements of Success‘ series.

Honest to goodness, for all the talk about marketing the town – about a comprehensive marketing plan – one would think that a seminar on getting out, folding, quitting, cashing in, giving up, etc., would not be a PR man’s first topic choice.

Chancellor Tefler, in particular, repeatedly & laughably hails his multi-million-dollar boondoggle as a great success.

Forget their ill-considered seminar.

There are opportunities to grow, build, and expand in Whitewater, and they’ll come in places wholly unconnected to a publicly-funded Tech Park and so-called Innovation Center.

Daily Bread for 8.14.14

Good morning, Whitewater.

Thursday will be sunny with a high of seventy-four.

Whitewater’s Police & Fire Commission meets tonight at 6:30 PM.

On this day in 1945, the existence of a Japanese proclamation of surrender is made public:

…an official announcement of Japan’s unconditional surrender to the Allies is made public to the Japanese people:

Even though Japan’s War Council, urged by Emperor Hirohito, had already submitted a formal declaration of surrender to the Allies, via ambassadors, on August 10, fighting continued between the Japanese and the Soviets in Manchuria and between the Japanese and the United States in the South Pacific. In fact, two days after the Council agreed to surrender, a Japanese submarine sank the Oak Hill, an American landing ship, and the Thomas F. Nickel, an American destroyer, both east of Okinawa.

In the afternoon of August 14, Japanese radio announced that an Imperial Proclamation was soon to be made, accepting the terms of unconditional surrender drawn up at the Potsdam Conference. That proclamation had already been recorded by the emperor. The news did not go over well, as more than 1,000 Japanese soldiers stormed the Imperial Palace in an attempt to find the proclamation and prevent its being transmitted to the Allies. Soldiers still loyal to Emperor Hirohito repulsed the attackers.

That evening, General Anami, the member of the War Council most adamant against surrender, committed suicide. His reason: to atone for the Japanese army’s defeat, and to be spared having to hear his emperor speak the words of surrender.

The emperor’s recording to his people was broadcast the next day, on 8.15.1945.

Today, a geography question from Google-a-Day:

After centuries of being passed between Genoa, France and Sardinia what European country was finally granted sovereignty in 1861?

The Enduring Work of Film Stars

Over this last week, both Robin Williams and Lauren Bacall passed away.  They were of different generations, of course, but both starred in memorable, compelling films. 

One often thinks of the films one liked most from an actor or actress.  For Williams and Bacall, I’ve two favorites.

For Williams, it’s Moscow on the Hudson (1984). He’s better known for other films, but I think Williams was convincing as a Russian defector who simply wanted a better life for himself in New York.

The film was one of politics of course, but that’s not the heart of William’s portrayal – as Vladimir Ivanoff is a musician who defects, in a Bloomingdale’s store in New York, from the Soviet Union. 

Bacall, aged eighty-nine, became a star in the black-and-white era of film, but that shouldn’t put off those who’ve not seen her films.  We sometimes think that if a film’s not new, it’s not clever, compelling, or worth one’s time. 

Oh, no – Bacall was clever and compelling in her time, as she would have been in any time. 

The Big Sleep (1946), in which she stars with Humphrey Bogart, is as modern in its way as any film of our time.  Bogart’s Philip Marlowe encounters Bacall’s Vivian Rutledge, and the encounter is … timeless. 

Williams and Bacall will be missed, but we have the comfort that they’ve left a fine, enduring legacy. 

August 12 Primary Results

A few remarks on last night’s results; those results are, of course, as yet unofficial. 

1. Governor’s Race. In the city, Burke received 462, to Walker’s 288.  Neither candidate had meaningful opposition (Brett Hulsey was inconsequential, really).  Summer, no real opposition, campus mostly empty, but Burke takes over 61% of the top-candidate vote.

It’s a bluer city with each election.  The GOP’s let the town slip away these last ten years. 

The AP did not provide a statewide count for how Walker did across Wisconsin (they don’t tally uncontested races, and the GAB doesn’t have its own election-night totals), but Burke received just over 259,000 votes. 

Seeing how well Burke polled in rural areas will tell a lot about November.  There’ll be more than a few poring over those numbers today. 

2. The 15th Senate District Primary.  Janis Ringhand won, with about 40% (6,157) of the vote, but with Austin Scieszinski close behind with 38% (5,883).  Fellow Democrats didn’t think much of Mike Sheridan, with only about one-in-five voting for him.  

Scieszinski has future opportunities – he outpolled Ringhand in Rock County (5,422 to 4,857). 

Sheridan needn’t have bothered.

3. Blackhawk Technical College Referendum.  The referendum failed by a wide margin.  In Rock County, it was down 58.38% to 41.62% (11,367 to 8,104).  In much smaller Green County, it also failed, but by less, 50.55% to 49.45% (1789 to 1750).

In Rock County, this referendum didn’t fail because Republicans opposed it – it failed because Democrats and small-goverment conservatives saw through an attempt by a few to get a public subsidy for their businesses’ training needs (instead of paying themselves). 

Results like this will happen in more and more places: voters will no longer be persuaded by unsubstantiated claims of ‘economic development’ benefits.

4. Democrats’ AG Race.  Jon Richards was favored last night (he had most big names among WisDems behind him); Susan Happ won big, anyway. 

WISGOP candidate Brad Schimel will still be a favorite in November, perhaps, but not by much.  Last night, Democrats rejected their party leaders’ advice, and picked a candidate who seems to have connected very well with primary voters, is fundamentally moderate, and will be assertive in campaigning.   

Schimel would certainly have preferred Milwaukee-area Richards.  He’s got rural Jefferson County Happ instead. 

She’ll make this a competitive race.

Daily Bread for 8.13.14

Good morning, Whitewater.

Wednesday brings a slight chance of afternoon showers, but otherwise a partly sunny day with a high of seventy-eight.

The Fire & Rescue Task Force meets tonight at 7:30 PM.

On this day in 1961, Communist East Germany began construction of the Berlin Wall:

On 15 June 1961, First Secretary of the Socialist Unity Party and GDR State Council chairman Walter Ulbricht stated in an international press conference, “Niemand hat die Absicht, eine Mauer zu errichten!” (No one has the intention of erecting a wall!). It was the first time the colloquial term Mauer (wall) had been used in this context.

The record of a telephone call between Nikita Khrushchev and Ulbricht on 1 August in the same year, suggests that it was from Khrushchev that the initiative for the construction of the wall came.[40][41] However, other sources suggest that Khrushchev had initially been wary about building a wall, fearing negative Western reaction. What is beyond dispute, though, is that Ulbricht had pushed for a border closure for quite some time, arguing that East Germany’s very existence was at stake.[42]

Khrushchev had been emboldened by US President John F. Kennedy’s tacit indication[how?] that the US would not actively oppose this action in the Soviet sector of Berlin.[43] On Saturday, 12 August 1961, the leaders of the GDR attended a garden party at a government guesthouse in Döllnsee, in a wooded area to the north of East Berlin. There Ulbricht signed the order to close the border and erect a wall.

At midnight, the police and units of the East German army began to close the border and, by Sunday morning, 13 August, the border with West Berlin was closed. East German troops and workers had begun to tear up streets running alongside the border to make them impassable to most vehicles and to install barbed wire entanglements and fences along the 156 kilometres (97 mi) around the three western sectors, and the 43 kilometres (27 mi) that divided West and East Berlin.

The barrier was built slightly inside East Berlin or East German territory to ensure that it did not encroach on West Berlin at any point. Later, it was built up into the Wall proper, the first concrete elements and large blocks being put in place on 17 August. During the construction of the Wall, National People’s Army (NVA) and Combat Groups of the Working Class (KdA) soldiers stood in front of it with orders to shoot anyone who attempted to defect. Additionally, chain fences, walls, minefields and other obstacles were installed along the length of East Germany’s western border with West Germany proper. A huge no man’s land was cleared to provide a clear line of fire at fleeing refugees.[44]

Google-a-Day poses a question from its Art & Literature category:

What was the name of the pet that often traveled with the artist of “Tuna Fishing”?

Why ‘This Woman’ Over and Over?

At the Gazette, that paper’s editorialist has a new editorial entitled, Our Views: Support K. Andreah Briarmoon and her ramblings at your own risk (subscription req’d).

Readers may recall that I’m opposed to Ms. Briarmoon’s light and trivial discussion of litigation – it’s a serious matter, worthy of careful reflection.  Ms. Briarmoon takes a more casual approach, but casual has no place in litigation; I reject her method. 

See, on this point, A Game It’s Not.

(I’ve also felt that the Gazette probably uses stories about Ms. Briarmoon to make municipal critics, generally, look silly.)  

Still, why does the editorialist begin, in each of five consecutive paragraphs, with a description of her as ‘this woman’? 

This woman suggested….

This woman lost….

This woman keeps….

This woman has lost….

This woman wants….

I often wonder, after reading a Gazette editorial: Can this be the product of an editorial board?  Could more than one person possibly have thought this was any good? 

As a rhetorical effort, the editorial is another failure, and the repeated emphasis on her gender is simply overdone. 

A more insightful writer would also have understood that there’s a context to ‘this man’ and ‘this woman’ that’s different, as women have not had the same opportunities in society.   One might wish that the context were the same, but we do not yet live in the conditions of gender equality.

The Gazette‘s editorials are often deficient, in reasoning and composition, but here I think we find a worse perspective, whether by ignorance or intention.  

Ms. Briarmoon, it seems, isn’t the only one with a problem of understanding.

August 12 Primary Questions

Here are a few results I’ll be looking at tonight, in the August primary:

1. Governor’s Race.  How do Walker, Burke (and even Hulsey, Burke’s eccentric challenger) fare in Whitewater?  Statewide and locally, how many votes do they get in a summer primary? 

2.  The 15th Senate District Primary.  For the Democrats, will it be a competitive Democrat (Ringhand or Scieszinski) or Sheridan (who is the only Democrat who would make this race competitive for the Republicans in November)? 

3.  Blackhawk Technical College Referendum.  Four million a year in taxes, backed by business interests and the Gazette in Janesville. 

(‘Business interests and the Gazette in Janesville’ are related in the way a screwdriver’s related to a screw.) 

Some in Janesville, as I cited yesterday in a quote from Rock Netroots, worry that one should

[n]ever underestimate the power of Forward Janesville, Rock County five-o or their Janesville Gazette media flacks. They’re a big “connected” club with a political agenda and operatives in every part of local government.

I’m curious how the referendum fares, and whether the Gazette (so proud as a self-declared ‘mover and shaker’) can push a bad idea to success. 

4.  Democrats’ AG Race.  Assemblyman Jon Richards, Jefferson County DA Susan Happ, and Dane County DA Ismael Ozanne are the candidates. 

Republican  Brad Schimel will be the GOP candidate in November. 

Richards is favored tonight, but statewide in November it might be that Susan Happ (with more prosecutorial experience than Richards) would prove a stronger match against Schimel. more >>