FREE WHITEWATER

Daily Bread for 7.9.14

Good morning, Whitewater.

Wednesday in the Whippet City will be sunny with a high of seventy-four.

Dylan, television performance, March 1963

On this day in 1962, Bob Dylan records Blowin’ in the Wind:

“This here ain’t no protest song or anything like that, ’cause I don’t write no protest songs.” That was how Bob Dylan introduced one of the most eloquent protest songs ever written when he first performed it publicly. It was the spring of his first full year in New York City, and he was onstage at Gerde’s Folk City in Greenwich Village, talking about a song he claims to have written in just 10 minutes: “Blowin’ In The Wind.” A few weeks later, on this day in 1962, Dylan walked into a studio and recorded the song that would make him a star.

Dylan’s recording of “Blowin’ In The Wind” would first be released nearly a full year later, on his breakthrough album, The Freewheelin’ Bob Dylan. This was not the version of the song that most people would first hear, however. That honor went to the cover version by Peter, Paul and Mary—a version that not only became a smash hit on the pop charts, but also transformed what Dylan would later call “just another song” into the unofficial anthem of the civil rights movement.

“Blowin’ In The Wind” bore little or no resemblance to the highly topical, highly literal protest songs of the day, but that may have been precisely what made it so effective as a protest song. A lyric like “How many roads must a man walk down, before you call him a man?” lends itself perfectly to those seeking racial justice, just as “How many seas must a white dove sail, before she sleeps in the sand?” does to those seeking peace. The moving, vaguely spiritual, clearly dissatisfied, yet ultimately ambiguous nature of “Blowin’ In the Wind” made it the quintessential protest song of the 1960s—”A song that the times seemed to call forth,” in the words of critic Greil Marcus.

Google-a-Day asks a geography question: “What is the term for a stagnant lake that forms along a winding river due to soil erosion resulting in an abandoned stream, cut off from the river?”

Daily Bread for 7.8.14

Good morning, Whitewater.

Tuesday in town will be partly sunny, with a high of seventy-seven, and a twenty percent chance of afternoon thunderstorms.

The Parks & Rec Board meets today at 5:30 PM.

On this day in 1776, the Liberty Bell rings to celebrate the Declaration of Independence:

… a 2,000-pound copper-and-tin bell now known as the “Liberty Bell” rings out from the tower of the Pennsylvania State House (now Independence Hall) in Philadelphia, summoning citizens to the first public reading of the Declaration of Independence. Four days earlier, the historic document had been adopted by delegates to the Continental Congress, but the bell did not ring to announce the issuing of the document until the Declaration of Independence returned from the printer on July 8.

On this day in 1850, America gets a supposed king:

1850 – James Jesse Strang Crowned King

On this date James Jesse Strang, leader of the estranged Mormon faction, the Strangites, was crowned king; the only man to achieve such a title in America. When founder Joseph Smith was assassinated, Strang forged a letter from Smith dictating he was to be the heir. The Mormon movement split into followers of Strang and followers of Brigham Young. As he gained more followers (but never nearly as many as Brigham Young), Strang became comparable to a Saint, and in 1850 was crowned King James in a ceremony in which he wore a discarded red robe of a Shakespearean actor, and a metal crown studded with a cluster of stars as his followers sang him hosannas. Soon after his crowning, he announced that Mormonism embraced and supported polygamy. (Young’s faction was known to have practiced polygamy, but had not at this time announced it publicly.)

A number of followers lived in Walworth County, including Strang at a home in Burlington. In 1856 Strang was himself assassinated, leaving five wives. Without Strang’s leadership, his movement disintegrated. [Source: Wisconsin Saints and Sinners, by Fred L. Holmes, p. 106-121]

Google-a-Day asks a pop culture question:

What comedians were the inspiration for the names of the two hungry cats in the short that marked Tweety Bird’s first appearance?

Rock Netroots

Down in Rock County, Lou Kaye has been publishing Rock Netroots since 2006 (a year longer than I’ve been publishing at FREE WHITEWATER). 

Kaye has a fine website.  I’m not of the Left as Kaye is, but that’s not necesary to enjoy Rock Netroots.

The community of which Kaye writes is beset by all sorts of chicanery and lies, from newspapers and self-styled elites, that hold back so many people in Janesville and environs.

Consider an excellent post from Rock Netroots, entitled, Collectivism To The Rescue Of Yet Another Janesville Business.

Kaye quotes the from the Gazette, twice:

“Ultimately, we came back to the fact that our employee base here in Rock County is exceptional, hardworking and fully trained,” Achs said. “We believe we have world-class manufacturing talent right here in our own hometown, and we decided that it was wisest to go with the people who helped us achieve our success in the first place.”

In order to keep United Alloy in Janesville, the city provided an incentive package worth $887,460, and the state kicked in a forgivable loan of $500,000 and tax credits worth up to $130,000.

Kaye correctly observes: “Okay, so they’re picking up $1.5M in collectivist hand-outs to stay put in Janesville, otherwise they would be moving out. Got it.”

I’d invite you to read the whole post, and visit the site regularly.

Great stuff. 

For a FW post on a related topic about a Whitewater business, see About that iButtonLink Announcement…

The Vacillating Paper in Janesville

If you’ve watched politics in Janesville lately, you know that there’s a proposal for a new fire station that’s both expensive (about nine-million dollars) and that would require the demolition of about a dozen residents’ homes.

The controversy over the station might have been mitigated, but the entire episode represents a succession of unforced errors of planning and communication.  The Gazette, along with government, has fumbled its response to a waxing protest movement.

When I have written recently about the need for visible work (Show Your Work), and for critical thinking (Local Gov’t Desperately Needs a Version of the ‘Tenth Man Rule’), I’ve had towns beyond our city in mind (at least in part) when I wrote those respective posts.

(For the Gazette links below, all are subscription req’d.)

A quick recap:

1.  Janesville’s Fire Department wanted a new fire station.

2.  Janesville’s City Council met in closed session to consider construction options, in a meeting that the Janesville Gazette rightly suggested was a violation of Wisconsin’s Open Meetings Laws. 

Not that they wanted any legal action, of course: “The Gazette or the district attorney could attempt to make the council pay for its illegal meeting, but that time and money might be better spent elsewhere.”

Diffidence or parsimony in the fight for open government is ill-becoming a serious newspaper. 

3.  Janesville’s Council went ahead anyway with the project.

4.   The Gazette‘s editorialist told those who were disappointed (including up to a dozen homeowners who would lose their homes) that

Regardless, what’s done is done. Residents don’t have to like how the decision was made, but it’s time to accept it. Sometimes, thinking long term creates immediate pain. That’s the case here.

Honest to goodness, the Gazette‘s editorials are a daily example of what a tone-deaf editorial board looks like. 

One would almost think that the editorial-page editor, Greg Peck, was trolling for any reaction, but there’s no reason to think he’s that shrewd. 

5. Later, the Gazette ran a story implying that a local resident may have been targeted for selective fire-code enforcement because of his oposition to the fire station.

6.  Local officials naturally took umbrage at the story suggesting they were targetting residents for punitive code enforcement.

7.  Scott Angus, Gazette VP for Newsroom Operations, only days thereafter wrote a blog post disavowing his paper’s earlier suggestion of punitive code enforcement, and insisting that it was wrong to impugn the reputation of city employees.

8.  The paper wants City Manager Mark Freitag to go ahead with the station, but they’re more-than-willing to cast doubt on his selection. (“It might be years before we know whether the council’s choice of Freitag was wise. Residents will never know, of course, what might have been under Winzenz because he didn’t get the chance.”)

(Freitag has no supportive, popular base within the city; members of the local business development group will not be enough to help him weather repeated controversies.  Neither the paper nor any special-interest group will be adequate to bolster Freitag if local politicians turn against him.)

When the Gazette‘s editorial page flubs even simple facts about Whitewater’s politics, or when they use a former radio-host as a so-called reporter and he can’t even identify the correct state in which a proposed business is headquarted (Wisconsin, not Florida), they’ll not even run a correction or apologize for that low-quality work. 

But when an official in Janesville complains, that paper doesn’t run a mere correction, it servilely and clumsily capitulates and runs in the other direction as hard and fast as it can. 

They’ve no stomach for watchdog journalism, as watchdog journalism doesn’t whimper and scurry at the first word of official displeasure.

If that paper had taken a more demanding line with government – on this issue and others – they would likely have compelled a better product from the city.

I sometimes think that there must be a conflict at the paper between those who’d like to be a genuinely independent institution and those who want to hold government’s hat and coat. 

Time and again, the hat-and-coat faction (assuming there should be anything other than that) wins. 

When a paper refuses to demand legal consequences for open meetings violations, deprecates ordinary residents’ feelings about their homes, impugns protesters as ill-informed while publishing ill-informed editorials and stories about towns nearby, and retreats when adult officials take umbrage, it’s simply not a solid paper.

Janesville: where supposed movers-and-shakers, aided by its local paper, ignore each other’s mediocrity. 

Daily Bread for 7.7.14

Good morning, Whitewater.

Monday in Whitewater will be mostly sunny with a high of eighty-four, and west winds of five to ten mph.

On this day in 1941, America acts to defend Iceland from the Axis:

The neutral United States moves closer to war with Germany when U.S. forces land on Iceland to take over its garrisoning from the British. From thereon, the U.S. Navy had the responsibility of protecting convoys in the nearby sea routes from attack by German submarines. With Iceland and its nearby sea routes under U.S. protection, the British Royal Navy was more free to defend its embattled Mediterranean positions.

The occupation of Iceland came less than a month after President Franklin D. Roosevelt froze all German and Italian assets in the United States and expelled the countries’ diplomats in response to the German torpedoing of the American destroyer Robin Moor. Much of the North Atlantic was now in the American sphere, and U.S. warships patrolled the area for German submarines, notifying London of all enemy activity.

On this day in 1832, Gen. Atkinson takes his forces to Palmyra:

1832 – Black Hawk War Encampment in Palmyra

On this date during the Black Hawk War, General Atkinson led his entire militia, which included future President’s Abraham Lincoln and Zachary Taylor, to a camp just south of Palmyra. [Source: History Just Ahead: A Guide to Wisconsin’s Historical Markers, edited by Sarah Davis McBride]

I’ve posted Google-a-Day‘s trivia questions before, and I’ll bring them back for a bit, for variety.  Here’s one of Monday’s questions (they run three per day):

Of the Romans’ “group of three” gods in the Archaic Triad, which one did not have a Greek counterpart?

Daily Bread for 7.6.14

Good morning, Whitewater.

Our holiday weekend ends with a mostly cloudy day, a high of eighty-six, and a one-in-five chance of thunderstorms after three o’clock.

I’ve a brief video of this year’s fireworks in Whitewater, Scenes from Whitewater, Wisconsin’s Independence Day Fireworks, 7.4.14, but what would it be like to film a fireworks displays from within those pyrotechnics? It would be this this video from Florida, filmed with a GoPro camera and a Phantom drone:

On July 6, 1775, a Congress considers conflict with Britain:

On this day in 1775, one day after restating their fidelity to King George III and wishing him “a long and prosperous reign” in the Olive Branch Petition, Congress sets “forth the causes and necessity of their taking up arms” against British authority in the American colonies. The declaration also proclaimed their preference “to die free men rather than live as slaves.”

In our own state’s history on this day in 1935, a riot took place at a malted milk plant:

1934 – Seven injured in riot at Horlick plant

On this day three policemen and five office employees of the Horlick Malted Milk Corp. were injured when a crowd of strike sympathizers stormed a motorcade of employees entering the plant’s main gate. Emerging from a crowd of 500 striking employees, the rioters overpowered police escorts, shattered windshields and windows, and pelted officers with rocks. Police blamed Communist influence for the incident, and former Communist congressional candidate John Sekat was arrested in the incident. Employees of the plant were demanding wage increases and recognition of the Racine County Workers Committee as their collective bargaining agent. [Source: Capital Times 7/6/1934, p. 1]