Daily Bread
Daily Bread for 9.9.11
by JOHN ADAMS •
Good morning.
Whitewater’s Friday looks to be mostly sunny, with a high of seventy-four, and a chance of showers in the early evening.
More today on Janesville’s liquor laws of the 1950s, from the Wisconsin Historical Society. On this day in 1954,
Janesville Residents Debate Liquor Laws
On this date Janesville residents participated in a public forum at the Janesville Public Library. The topic of discussion was whether Janesville should allow women to be served at the bar, in taverns. Residents also debated whether dancing should be allowed in taverns. Speaking to lift the bans was Erv Lacey, field director of the Tavern League of Wisconsin. Lacey noted that the law against women being served was discriminatory and contended that Janesville taverns lose business because of the laws. The Rev. Frank Dauner, pastor of United Brethren Church, said the strict prohibitions should remain intact because alcohol threatened public health, safety and peaceful domestic life. [Source: Janesville Gazette]
These many years later, this debate’s ongoing, but with efforts at additional restrictions (for men and women equally) advocated to restore state control long since ceded.
Daily Bread
Daily Bread for 9.8.11
by JOHN ADAMS •
Good morning.
It’s a lovely day ahead, with sunny skies and a high temperature of seventy-six for Whitewater.
The Wisconsin Historical Society recalls a step for equality in Janesville, one that town took in 1958:
1958 – Janesville Women Belly Up to the Bar
On this date the Janesville city council voted 4-2 to finally end a paternalistic and discriminatory ordinance that prohibited women from drinking at the bar. Since the end of Prohibition in 1933, women had been banned from being served while standing at the bar in Janesville taverns. [Source: Janesville Gazette]
One small, unnecessary law swept away.
I saw a documentary recently, entitled Between the Folds, about origami paper-folding, that I would readily recommend. My late father was accomplished in this way; his son wishes he had, but utterly lacks, a similar talent. Here’s a trailer for the film:
I caught Between the Folds on Netflix via streaming, and it’s fascinating. Bet it hooks you, too.
Daily Bread
Daily Bread for 9.7.11
by JOHN ADAMS •
Good morning.
It’s a sunny day ahead for Whitewater, with a high temperature of seventy-three.
There’s a meeting of the Landmarks Commission today at 5 p.m. The agenda for the meeting is available online.
The Wisconsin Historical Society notes that efforts to preserve effigy mounds, such as we have in Whitewater, have a long and proud history in our state:
1908 – Man Mound Park Dedicated
On this date the Man Mound Park in Sauk County was dedicated. The Mound depicts a gigantic human figure, 204 feet in length, in the act of walking. Efforts by William H. Canfield and Dr. Increase Lapham led to the preservation and appreciation of many Native American lands, especially Effigy Mounds such as Man Mound.
The Sauk County Historical Society’s website offers more information about Man Mound Park.
City, Innovation Center/Tech Park
The Innovation Center, Virtual and Real
by JOHN ADAMS •
Every exercise in puffery about the taxpayer-funded Innovation Center is an opportunity to demonstrate how wasteful the project really is. The gentlemen behind the project would do better to say nothing about it than to hype it yet again, but that they cannot do: insisting on the grandeur of that empty effort is who they are, and what they do.
The professed goal of the project.
Whitewater’s planned Innovation Center and Tech Park rest on a multi-million dollar federal grant and millions in federally-subsidized bonds. The grant is for $4.7 million, and here is how a page from the Economic Development Administration described the purpose for those millions:
September 7-September 11, 2009
4,740,809 to the Whitewater Community Development Authority, the University of Wisconsin Whitewater, and the City of Whitewater, Wisconsin, to fund construction of the new Innovation Center and infrastructure to serve the technology industrial park, including a road linking the project with the University of Wisconsin’s Whitewater campus. The goal of the project is to create jobs to replace those lost in the floods of 2008 and those lost from recent automotive plant closures. The Innovation Center will serve as both a training center and technology business incubator and will be constructed to meet Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) green building certification standards. A portion of the project’s cost will be funded through EDA’s Global Climate Change Mitigation Incentive Fund. This investment is part of an $11,051,728 project which grantees estimate will help create 1,000 jobs and generate $60 million in private investment.
Eleven-million, one-thousand jobs, sixty-million in private investment.
A ludicrious, actual use of the project.
In his Weekly Report from 8.26.11, Whitewater’s city manager announced the first — perhaps of many! — virtual tenants for this actual, eleven-million dollar taxpayer project. Millions in federal spending, and millions more in local municipal debt, but Whitewater gets
….the ability for entrepreneurs to become a virtual tenant of this facility. Virtual tenancy allows the entrepreneur to avail him/herself to University of Wisconsin-Whitewater business development services as well as mail and phone services at the Innovation Center….The Innovation Center’s first virtual tenant is…a Janesville-based entrepreneur who is developing an internet based business.
Millions of Americans unemployed, Wisconsin job growth lagging, and Whitewater with high child poverty, but eleven million for virtual tenants. They’ll be virtually joining a building that accommodates publicly-funded employees shuffled from Milton, Wisconsin.
Although I’m a critic of the New Deal, I see well enough that the New Dealers, on their worst days, were more serious and committed to the actual needs of struggling people than those touting this vain and frivolous project. (See, Whitewater’s Innovation Center from the Perspective of the New Deal.)
On both August 26th and September 2nd, Whitewater’s city manager discussed the visit of federal officials to Whitewater, to see the Innovation Center.
There was much talk about how these were ‘high ranking officials,’ and I’m sure they were. Funny, though, that all the emphasis is on the intangible (future this or that) or the exaggerated (that the building is notably environmentally-friendly in its design). No building of its kind is green; pretending otherwise is silly. The only question facing a prospective builder is whether the environmental disturbance is worth the cost.
By the way, I’m not sure what to make of an official, a high-ranking one, no less, who flew out from Washington to pour ‘effusive’ praise on the reputedly green building. Funny, too, that the city manager doesn’t see that for most Americans, effusive praise is excessive praise. This kind of praise — assuming that it was truly effusive — is out of character for most people, and wisely so. These are difficult times, and the fawning, the sugary, and the flamboyant have no place in our policy now.
About that Innovation Center story…
Finally, in the State Journal, Barry Adams has a story entitled, City, university collaborate on Whitewater Technology Park, that mostly discusses businesses that aren’t even in the Tech Park.
The story mentions existing businesses not in the Tech Park, including one that has moved into the separate Business Park, but — wait for it — one business that is at the Innovation Center that recently worked with “10 UW-Whitewater students on Java computer programming skills.”
Oddly, the story omits the names of the two publicly-funded Innovation Center tenants who take of the lion’s share of rented space.
Most of the story is about non-Park, German businesses Simonswerk and Schenck AccuRate.
The two enterprises make a nice back-of-the-book story about foreign companies, of course, but neither is a Tech Park tenant, and so neither fulfills any of the EDA’s stated incremental funding goals.
All the public relations in the world can’t rehabilitate this effort.
City
Whitewater-Area League of Women Voters September 2011 Newsletter
by JOHN ADAMS •
The Whitewater-Area League of Women Voters’ September 2011 Newsletter is out, with articles and a calendar of upcoming LWV events.
The latest copy of the LWV newsletter is available as a link on my blogroll, and is embedded below, with coding through Google.
Upcoming events:
Date: September 10th (Saturday)
Event: Whitewater Area LWV Board Meeting
Where: 10 AM Whitewater Public Library
Date: September 15th (Thursday)
Event: Whitewater-Area LWV Public Program “Understanding the New Voter ID Law”
Where: 7:00 PM Cravath Lakefront Pavilion
Date: September 24th (Saturday)
Event: Moving Planet: A Global Day of Climate Actions
Date: October 15th
Event: LWV on-campus program “Impact of the Voter ID Law on Students” Location and time to be announced
Daily Bread
Daily Bread for 9.6.11
by JOHN ADAMS •
Good morning.
It’s a sunny day ahead for Whitewater, with a high temperature of sixty-nine.
There’s an Alcohol Licensing Committee meeting tonight at 6 p.m. At 6:30 p.m., Common Council meets; the meeting agenda is available online.
Noted bluesman David ‘Honeyboy’ Edwards passed away, at the age of ninety-six, on August 29th. Here he is, from April of this year, signing Catfish Blues:
Public Meetings
Landmarks Commission
by JOHN ADAMS •
Holiday
Happy Labor Day
by JOHN ADAMS •
Daily Bread
Daily Bread for 9.5.11
by JOHN ADAMS •
Good morning.
It’s a mostly sunny Labor Day ahead for Whitewater, with a high temperature of sixty-seven.
One has a chance, with simply a small telescope or binoculars, to see a supernova from one’s backyard:
Starting this weekend, the closest supernova found in at least 25 years will be visible from your backyard with just binoculars or a small telescope. The exploding white dwarf star is currently brightening in the Pinwheel Galaxy, nestled, from our perspective, within the Big Dipper.
Recent Tweets, 8.28-9.3
by JOHN ADAMS •
Can’t say the State Journal cares about demographics: says teacher ‘Retirements offer opportunity’ bit.ly/nyrzSd
3 Sep
Beat Sweetener Alert™ 2011 Fittest Execs Overall Top 20 – BizTimes bit.ly/naQ3q7
3 Sep
Connecticut Lawyer Describes Wisconsin Supreme Court: “Look at the Choking Cheeseheads” bit.ly/rjmw2n
2 Sep
Because when mayor is embarrassing rumpot, best course is to leave him in office & pad payroll with new position bit.ly/reYvaO
2 Sep
“The economy is slowly grinding to a halt” yhoo.it/n9dlis
2 Sep
Justices dispute Gableman account of second altercation involving Bradley bit.ly/noa9i4
1 Sep
Village leadership responds to dissent: Caledonia seeks to oust plan commission member bit.ly/nGyIi8
31 Aug
At least the game should be good: Kid Rock to play before Packers’ opener vs. Saints bit.ly/rulSMK
30 Aug
Outrageous confusion over political speech rights: With No Recall Effort Under Way, Are Walker Recall Signs Legal? bit.ly/oT4rgk
30 Aug
Could this truly have been the first such altercation in Wisconsin? Woman punches husband in head over Gov. Walker bit.ly/pvWOQc
29 Aug
So far: 198 Americans file to run for president 2012 Presidential Form 2 Filers 1.usa.gov/dNyD9R
29 Aug
He’ll keep running until a majority relents and votes for him: Mark Neumann announces run for U.S. Senate bit.ly/qKfdDy
29 Aug
Whitewater’s Next, Permanent Police Chief « FREE WHITEWATER bit.ly/qkhyiC
28 Aug
Cartoons & Comics
Sunday Morning Cartoon: Pearls Before Swine
by JOHN ADAMS •
Free Markets
University of Chicago law students defend rights of street vendors
by JOHN ADAMS •
There’s an encouraging story from Chicago about the legal defense of entrepreneurial, hard-working street vendors’ offerings of good food at low prices. The vendors’ popular fare has been under attack from incumbent businesses looking to use government to limit competition and inhibit consumer choice. Day after day, Chicagoans choose these vendors over alternative offerings:
[Vendors’ association Vice President Virginia] Lugo said the street vendors begin selling at 5:00 a.m. in neighborhoods with a large Latino clientele looking for traditional products like tamales, chicharrones pork cracklings, pupusas thick Salvadoran tortillas, champurrados thick hot drinks made with ground corn and chocolate, corn on the cob and sliced fruit.
In-demand food trucks have found an ally in the Institute for Justice, and its Clinic on Entrepreneurship at the University of Chicago Law School.
It’s well-past time that vendors defended through litigation their rights (and by consequence those of consumers). Regulations run counter to American free enterprise, and disproportionately impact offerings from newly-arrived or mostly ethnic communities.
See, La Prensa.
See, also, IJ Clinic on Entrepreneurship and the My Streets, My Eats initiative.
Previously: Defending Street Vendors, Food Trucks, and Consumer Choice, and Institute for Justice Defends the Rights of Street Vendors. more >>
Comment Forum
Weekend Poll and Comment Forum: Merchants’ bans on politicians
by JOHN ADAMS •
Reason‘s Nanny of the Month for August 2011 features something different this month: a ban Reason supports. In Michigan, private tavern owners are banning public legislators over an anti-smoking law they say is killing their businesses. Patronage has plummeted, and the barkeeps have decided to strike back by excluding those who have hurt their taverns’ profits.
Michigan Bar Owners Ban Lawmakers for Banning Smoking! (Nanny of the Month, Aug 2011)
They’re banning pet pigs in St, Charles, Missouri (even small, hypoallergenic ones like Pepper!) and Nice Cream in Illinois (even though it’s packed with natural ingredients and the owner says its bacterial levels are well below state-approved levels!), but neither of those could claim the top slot because – well, this time Nanny of the Month is doing something different…
For the first time ever Nanny of the Month is cheering a ban.
That’s right, starting September 1, more than 500 Michigan restaurant and bar owners are banning state lawmakers from their establishments. State Senator So-and-so wants a brew? Too bad. Politicians won’t be served until they revisit the state’s 2010 smoking ban, which, owners say, has devastated business, and left bars like Sporty O’Tooles on the verge of collapse.
What do you think? Do you support a merchant action like this? Merchants may lawfully prohibit certain potential customers, so long as they do not run afoul of anti-discrimination statutes (this ban on anti-smoking legislators would be legal).
Although efforts like this can backfire, I’d support a tavern-owners’ ban on anti-smoking politicians (even though I don’t smoke). It’s a good idea, now and gain, to remind legislators’ that their actions have consequences for common people, and that as politicians they aren’t immune from diverse consequences of their legislation, either.
Comments will be moderated against profanity and trolls; otherwise have at it. This post will be open until Sunday morning.

