FREE WHITEWATER

Milwaukee County’s Immoral Utilitarianism: Update 13 (Punishing Honesty)

It was predictable that if Milwaukee County Board of Supervisors Chairman Holloway submitted a motion to censure supervisor Lynne De Bruin for revealing the truth about the abuses at the county’s Mental Health Complex, he did so knowing that he had the votes lined up to win.

Those votes he had, and the county board censured De Bruin on a vote of 13-6. See, County Board Votes to Censure Supervisor Lynne De Bruin.

When confronted with evidence of official abuses and a public official’s misconduct, Milwaukee County walked the well-trod path of most communities — blaming honest people rather than addressing wrongful government conduct. The issue won’t go away so easily, although at this stage, the County will likely dig in, and try to hold on until after the fall elections. Behavioral Health Division administrator Chianelli should have been fired at the first certain revelations, weeks ago.

Wisconsin’s possible next administration is looking no better than the one it seeks to succeed.

I’ve posted about Chianelli’s policy, and the tragedy that is conduct at the MHC, before. See, A Milwaukee County Bureaucrat’s Immoral Utilitarianism, Update: A Milwaukee County Bureaucrat’s Immoral Utilitarianism, Update 2, Update 3, Update 4, Update 5, Update 6, Update 7, Update 8, Update 9, Update 10, Update 11, and

Discussing the Death of Decency on CNBC’s Powerlunch

In Nick Gillespie Discusses the “Death of Decency” On CNBC’S Powerlunch, Reason’s Gillespie contends that although popular entertainment has grown coarser, there are many positive social trends that are moving in the right direction.

I agree on both counts, and I’d suggest that if pop culture has grown coarser, the answer is change in private conduct. Unfortunately, one often hears that the only way to improve conduct and language in civil society (a fundamentally private domain) is through laws, regulations, and restrictions. That’s not a path to improvement — it’s a guarantee of even worse problems.

People will not be made better through the paternalism of the state, something that really amounts to the condescending, hectoring tyranny of middling scolds exceeding their mandates. The best example is the faith — belief is not advanced truly through a state-supported church (as some nations in Europe still have); the faith that a state embraces becomes corrupt and undesirable. A few people, alone in a household in China, with no support outside, are closer to the truth of life than any hereditary monarch who declares herself the supposed defender of the faith.

There’s also the obvious problem of politicians’ and bureaucrats’ self-interest, a self-interest that all others see, but that officeholders, themselves, refuse to recognize. When a politician tells you that he’d like you to be polite, he really means that he’d not like you to criticize him. What he calls impolite speech, a free society recognizes as lawful criticism.

As for what appears on NBC, Fox, etc., people should and will turn away from the vulgar and repulsive. They’ll do so not because the state banned something, but because people of conscience will reject undesirable programs, on their own. Men and women don’t need guidance from politicians who are no wiser than anyone else.

Here’s an accompanying description of the clip:


Reason.tv’s Nick Gillespie appeared on CNBC’s PowerLunch to discuss the “death of decency” and whether television is moving in the right direction, on June 8, 2010.

Approximately 3.25 minutes.

Raw Milk Update

100% Natural

Here’s a raw milk update. I’ve been opposed to restrictions on the consumption of natural, raw milk. Adults should be able to decide what kind of milk they’d like to drink, without government’s interference. We’re a dairy state, and we should be able to drink and eat the kind of dairy products we’d like.

Unfortunately, Governor Doyle vetoed even a modest change in our laws, a change that would have permitted limited raw milk sales for a temporary period.

Some dairy farmers are challenging Wisconsin’s current law and its enforcement. One of those farms was in Walworth County, and one of those cases was initially filed there. Following a hearing earlier this June, that case was transferred — following a motion filed on behalf of Wisconsin’s Department of Agriculture, Trade, and Consumer protection — to Dane County for consolidation with another case. See, Crying Over Raw Milk.

Feldman ably describes the politics over raw milk:

…in April, during the waning hours of the legislative session, the Raw Milk Act finally passed, sending Representative Danou [a propoent of raw milk sales] to his feet again to tip back a glass of what must have been pretty warm raw milk. Victory seemed assured; Wisconsin’s governor, James Doyle, had earlier indicated he would sign the bill.

Mr. Danou had no way of knowing that in the meantime the Cheese Makers Association, the Farm Bureau Federation and the Dairy Business Association, a sort of “Axis of Ag,” had sold their anti-raw case to Governor Doyle, blending their self-interest with warnings over diphtheria-, salmonellosis- and strep-bearing unpasteurized milk.

Governor Doyle has had his moments, but Solomon he wasn’t on May 19, when he vetoed the Raw Milk Act – despite his February approval of a tangentially related bill that made the dills and salsas of home-picklers street-legal.

Still, it wasn’t a total loss for the dairymen. The veto may prove a tipping point for public awareness and farm acceptance of raw milk. The movement gets its energy from the raw-food crusade swirling nationwide, but it’s now also drawing strength from Wisconsin’s farmer-activists, who’ve been pouring milk down the Capitol steps to protest prices for so long that many believe that’s why the marble is so white.

One thing’s clear, as Feldman notes — this debate favors raw milk advocates, and those defending prohibition are out-of-step with a trend favoring free consumption of milk in a milk-producing state.

The Outgoing Wisconsin Administration’s Cronyism

When people go looking for a job, they’re often asked to provide a resume. For more demanding and higher-paying jobs, it’s a standard practice across America. (America: a vast continental republic of over three-hundred million people.)

Wisconsin’s part of America (at last check), but there’s different standard for one highly-placed member of the Doyle administration. The Wisconsin State Journal‘s Deborah Ziff reports that

The University of Wisconsin System offered a $245,000 per year position to Wisconsin Department of Administration secretary Michael Morgan without requesting his resume, records show.

The hire was criticized as political patronage by Rep. Steve Nass, R-Whitewater. Morgan would have been out of a job when Gov. Jim Doyle left office next year.

The university offered Morgan the job as vice president for administration and fiscal affairs without conducting a national search.

The UW System sent a letter of offer to Morgan for the job on June 1 and five hours later, Morgan e-mailed a copy of his resume to officials, according to the records. The State Journal requested the documents under the state’s open records law.

See, No Resume Required for $245,000-a-year University of Wisconsin System Job.

This is outrageous, but other than one state representative and one reporter, where’s the outrage? Nass is right to question this appointment, and the State Journal did good work in showing that Morgan got his offer letter before he sent his resume. Conduct like this creates the clear appearance of unfair preferential treatment. Explanations that the Doyle team’s issued are patronizing and unbelievable.

The Doyle Administration both embarrasses itself and undermines the efforts of Democrats running this year with actions like this.

(It’s Tom Barrett who will be saddled with the taint of the unpopular, outgoing Doyle Administration in the fall campaign. Doyle’s team will head off to lucrative jobs and line up great opportunities while Barrett campaigns.)

Chimpanzees: Cuddly Primates or Vicious Killers? Vicious Killers!

They only look cute to dupe humanity into a false sense of complacency:

The truth is far more sinister:

A recent story in the New York Times, entitled, Chimps, Too, Wage War and Annex Rival Territory, describes accurately how dangerous chimpanzees can be. It’s about time someone wrote honestly and forthrightly about the chimp menace. For years, I’ve suspected that humanity has been fed a bill of goods by the so-called “scientific community,” most especially the screwball Englishwoman, Jane Goodall.

Chimps, especially young ones, can be deceptively, duplicitously cute. It’s all nonsense. No tire swing, no small tricycle, should beguile innocent humans into a false sense of security. Chimpanzees are deadly, vicious wild animals. The NYT story explains accurately what chimps do to each other: “Enemy males will be held down, then bitten and battered to death. Females are usually let go, but their babies will be eaten.” The story notes that, “[c]himpanzees are immensely powerful, and since they can tear each other apart, they could also make short work of any researcher who incurred their animosity.”

Yes, they could. They’re violent, murderous cannibals. If they’ll treat each other this way, then we can be sure that they’ll be even more violent with humans. Much more violent, I wouldn’t wonder.

(Jane Goodall made a career out of ignoring the truth of chimp violence, and for it she should be roundly criticized. England, however, is a disordered place of nutty aristocrats, so she’s now Dame Jane Goodall. The English reward error, stupidity, and mediocrity at every turn. It’s how, after all, they came upon the idea of a hereditary monarchy.)

I don’t believe that there should be legal restrictions on the kinds of animals people can own, but scientists and naturalists owe the public a realistic description of chimpanzees’ tendency toward inflicting mayhem on defenseless humans. People are foolish to own chimps as pets, and should be liable for the damage they cause to property, neighbors, etc.

These animals should be left in their native habits. Alternatively, they should be kept in private zoos, surrounded by deep moats, high fences, solid walls, and strategically-placed machine gun nests.

It’s the least we owe each other, and all humanity.

Daily Bread for Whitewater, Wisconsin: 6-24-10

Good morning,

The forecast today calls for a sunny day with a high of eighty-one degrees.

We’ve had a lot of rain, but the Wisconsin Historical Society recalls a day and place that has the most rain in state history:

1946 – Most Precipitation in One Day

On this date Mellen, Wisconsin received 11.72 inches of rain within a single day. This set a record for Wisconsin for precipitation received within 24 hours. [Source: National Weather Service]

Mellen is a small town, with fewer than a thousand people, in Ashland County, Wisconsin:

Wayne Allyn Root: A Libertarian Star Who Drives Libertarians Crazy

David Weigel of the Washington Post‘s “Right Now” blog (covering conservatives more than libertarians) writes about press coverage of Wayne Allyn Root, former vice presidential nominee of the Libertarian Party in 2008. Root has never been popular — that’s a kind understatement — with left-leaning libertarians.

(They see him as a crypto-Republican. He is, however, popular with center-right members of the LP. Even a third party has factions.)

Root contends that he’s on a sensible and popular path, and Weigel quotes Root as contending, in his typically humble fashion, that

“If I’m not on the right track,” said Root when asked about his libertarian critics, “how can you explain Fox News, a conservative TV network, giving TV shows to Glenn Beck, Jon Stossel and Judge Andrew Napolitano – all strong libertarian thinkers? How can you explain the success of Ron Paul, Rand Paul and Sharron Angle? How can you explain [my coming] out of nowhere to become the 2008 Libertarian Party Vice Presidential nominee, and now becoming an overnight media sensation on Fox News, Fox Business, CNN, CNBC, MSNBC – doing 20 to 30 radio interviews a week across the country?”

In the end, Weigel’s observation about libertarians, the LP, and the Tea Party movement is partly correct: “There’s a natural constituency for Libertarians; it’s just that tea party activists are more comfortable in the GOP, and worried that splitting their votes would help Democrats.”

The Tea Party and libertarian movement aren’t the same thing; members of each have some shared interests, but they’ve differences, too. The groups are not so easy to unite as Weigel implies.

I am sure, however, that America will return to sound principles of limited government. She’s doing so now, all around us.

See, A Libertarian Star Who Drives Libertarians Crazy.

Protecting a Trademark Too Zealously: “Pork Board Squeals Over Imaginary Unicorn Meat”

Over at the La Crosse Tribune there’s a story about the National Pork Board’s cease and desist letter over a parody that described unicorn meat as the “new white meat.” The Pork Board complained over the parody that the website ThinkGeek issued. (The website previously teased about bacon with an imaginary toy called “My First Bacon.”)

There’s a wasteful foolishness – a reflexiveness – in a group that complains about a parody that mentions unicorn meat as being “an excellent source of sparkles.” They’ve simply made themselves look dull and humorless.

See, “Pork Board Squeals Over Imaginary Unicorn Meat.”

An Economy Worse Than Two Years Ago

Nassim Nicholas Taleb, a university professor and author of the excellent book, The Black Swan, contends that our economy is worse than it was two years ago. See, Debt Spreading ‘Like a Cancer’: Black Swan Author.

(I’ve read Taleb’s Black Swan; it’s an excellent book.)

Here’s Taleb’s assessment:

The economic situation today is drastically worse than a couple years ago, and the euro is doomed as a concept, Nassim Taleb, professor and author of the bestselling book “The Black Swan,” told CNBC on Thursday.

“We had less debt cumulatively (two years ago), and more people employed. Today, we have more risk in the system, and a smaller tax base,” Taleb said.

“Banks balance sheets are just as bad as they were” two years ago when the crisis began and “the quality of the risks hasn’t improved,” he added….

The Obama administration’s efforts to pull the US out of recession haven’t succeeded, according to Taleb. “It’s not that they make mistakes, it’s that they almost get nothing right.” Moreover, a second major stimulus package may be futile, he warned.

“Obama promised us 8 percent unemployment through stimulus. It hasn’t worked.” There are significantly more liabilities in the US than in other countries around the world, he said.

Just as the stimulus failed nationally, it’s done nothing for us locally. I know, and you know, that we’ve millions in taxpayers’ money for an Innovation Center (and millions more in added debt from municipal bonds). These several millions are useful for producing headlines, not improving bottom lines. One might just as well consider the entire amount a publisher’s advance on a work of fantasy or science fiction.

There’s a way out for us: a huge reduction in the size of local government, a reduction in taxes, and the abolition of many fees and permit charges. I’ll offer suggested cuts in the fall, during municipal budget season (and publish readers’ suggestions, too).

We have huge opportunities before us, if we’d only abandon the failed, government-centric approach that’s left us lagging nearby communities.

If we don’t reform, then we will have only ourselves to blame.

The Real Surprise in the U.S. News and World Report Poll on Sarah Palin

There’s a U.S. News and World Report poll about Sarah Palin, asking what readers think of her. It’s not surprising that newspapers and websites have polls about Palin, as she’s well-known, and typically evokes an opinion from readers. My point here isn’t about Palin, but about the website that offers the poll.

What’s surprising is that I, or anyone else, actually found a U.S. News and World Report poll on Palin, or any other topic. I saw it as a link from another website, and that means that at least two people on earth have visited the USNWR website. Add in a few family members of that website’s staff, and perhaps four or five people have taken the poll. Add in a few monkeys typing randomly on keyboards, and the total number of mammals would still be under a dozen.

Sarah Palin probably has more friends on Facebook than there are people who realize that USNWR still survives as a web-based publication. So different is the media landscape from even a decade ago, that print publications once well-known are now afterthoughts.

Milwaukee County’s Immoral Utilitarianism: Update 12 (On Cue, the Self-Exonerating Study)

An embattled public official will resort to a few quick — but increasingly ineffective — techniques to distract the public from official incompetence, mistakes, abuses, and injuries inflicted on ordinary citizens. One is to demonize anyone who questions official conduct, including courageous and honest public officials. The second is to produce — right from a hat — a study that proves everything is Well and Wonderful.

In Milwaukee County, where the administrator of the Behavioral Health Division presides over a world of abuses, errors, mistakes, and immoral utilitarian policies, they’re trying both defensive tactics to shield government employees and officials. Defenders of the status quo are busy trying to censure the honest politician who revealed Milwaukee County’s abusive and incompetent mental health practices, and now they’ve offered their own study that purports show Milwaukee is performing above national standards.

It’s not an independent study, it’s their own study, that shows these supposed strengths. After federal and state watchdogs listed failure after failure at Milwaukee County’s Mental Health Complex, the people who are accused of incompetency contend that they’re performing above the national average.

See, Mental Health Complex report defends mixed-gender wards: Staff-run study finds sexual contact is below national rate.

But here’s the truth about conduct at the county’s complex, conduct that’s a threat to patients, but also to political ambitions:

Patient advocates and sexual assault treatment professionals said the incidence of sex between patients reported by the county administrators seemed surprisingly low.

The Journal Sentinel reported this month that it had obtained a letter from Milwaukee County Supervisor Lynne De Bruin saying the county’s top mental health administrator, John Chianelli, intentionally housed female patients with men known to be dangerous “because the presence of women reduces the likelihood of the men being violent.”

A federal inspection report on the complex found 11 of 17 patients whose records were reviewed had inappropriate sexual contact during the last half of 2009. One 22-year-old patient from that group became pregnant and another patient was charged with two counts of felony sexual assault.

Disability Rights Wisconsin, which is conducting its own investigation, found that five patients from that same group had been sexually assaulted. A report from the rights group in May found a disturbing lack of concern by hospital administrators over the amount of inappropriate sex among patients.

I wrote that the techniques of blame-casting on honest politicians, and of suddenly producing self-created and exonerating studies, now prove ineffective. I well understand the purpose of these techniques: to create uncertainty, and to make an issue of clear abuse and incompetency seem like a complex, complicated debate between two sides on equal footing.

These techniques would have been more effective when there was no easy way to rebut them. When only a few newspapers and television stations controlled the news, before talk radio, the web, blogs, online newspaper comments, etc., politicians and bureaucrats would have had a much better chance of containing criticism, using these two techniques.

Not now, and it’s evidence of how out-of-step with these new media politicians are that they rely on yesterday’s deceptions to combat today’s truth.

Concerning my small town of Whitewater, I’ve pointed out that wherever and whenever people are able to express themselves freely, they express concerns that politicians ignore. In an unrestricted format, the cheery lies and happy deceptions of career bureaucrats and long-serving incumbents meet — as they would not so often in an earlier era — the truth of residents’ views.

I’ve posted about Chianelli’s policy, and the tragedy that is conduct at the MHC, before. See, A Milwaukee County Bureaucrat’s Immoral Utilitarianism, Update: A Milwaukee County Bureaucrat’s Immoral Utilitarianism, Update 2, Update 3, Update 4, Update 5, Update 6, Update 7, Update 8, Update 9, Update 10, and Update 11

Daily Bread for Whitewater, Wisconsin: 6-23-10

Good morning,

Today’s weather forecast calls for strong thunderstorms with a high of eighty-seven degrees.

There are some captivating photos of the recent storms to hit our area at the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel website.

My favorites from those listed are photos of the actual storm (rather than the aftermath): numbers 3, 6, 7, 9, 10, and 11.

The Wisconsin Historical Society recalls that on this day in 1911,

On this date Wausau native John Schwister became a pioneer in Wisconsin aviation by flying the state’s first home-built airplane. The plane, named the “Minnesota-Badger,” was constructed of wooden ribs covered with light cotton material.

Powered by an early-model aircraft engine, the “Minnesota-Badger” flew several hundred feet and reached a maximum altitude of 20 feet. [Source: Wisconsin Aviation Hall of Fame]

The Foolishness of Demonizing Productive, Private Enterprise

I don’t know of anyone who doubts that the massive oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico is an environmental disaster. After that people’s reactions differ — sadness, frustration, anger, etc. There’s more than enough grandstanding among America’s politicians, often along the lines of how heads must roll, etc. (That’s heads of those at British Petroleum, not of government managers or politicians, themselves.) By now, there have been thousands of stories, articles, and essays explaining how everyone employed at BP should be punished, jailed, or tarred and feathered.

After the federal administration is done vilifying everyone it can blame from among the world’s oil executives, one wonders if there will be anyone knowledgeable left with expertise to help solve the crisis. Arthur Herman wonders about this, too, in an essay entitled, What Obama Could Learn from FDR.

If President Obama intends to use President Roosevelt’s leadership during World War II as his model for handling the BP oil spill, he has it exactly backward….

The White House specifically said the [president’s recent] speech was modeled on Franklin Roosevelt’s fireside chats during the Great Depression and World War II. At its climax, Obama even referenced America’s creation of the so-called Arsenal of Democracy as an example of how Americans can seize their destiny and achieve greatness.

He’s right, but Obama may regret picking that example….

if Obama intends to use Roosevelt’s leadership during World War II as his model for handling the BP oil spill, he has it exactly backward. FDR built that arsenal of democracy by working with business, not fighting against it – let alone by keeping a boot on its neck. If Roosevelt had been speaking from the Oval Office last Tuesday, he would have announcing the creation of a presidential panel of oil executives and engineers to help BP solve the oil spill, rather than a scheme to strip BP of its profits.

This is because, in the year and a half before Pearl Harbor, Roosevelt realized that the best way to mobilize a country like ours for a great task is to unleash the productivity and ingenuity of American industrial enterprise. His decision outraged some of his closest advisors and allies. It flew in the face of his own progressive instincts. But it not only helped to win World War II, it pulled the United States out of the Great Depression, and it has provided a useful model of how government needs to partner with the private sector, ever since.

Herman goes on to show how, as war approached, Roosevelt walked away the anti-businesses positions of some of his officials, and instead wisely allowed capable private industries to produce the weapons and supplies needed to defeat the Axis. (America produced so many weapons and supplies that even Stalin acknowledged that victory would not have been possible without America’s private production.)

Demonizing oil executives and oil companies, taking from them rather than cooperating with them, will gain America nothing, and cost the Gulf and her residents much. FDR’s example is the one that the current administration should be following.