A real treat today — Ben Sommer’s cover of Sister from the Black Keys’ El Camino.
Enjoy!
A real treat today — Ben Sommer’s cover of Sister from the Black Keys’ El Camino.
Enjoy!
Good morning.
It’s a warm, wet day for Whitewater, with a high temperature of thirty-nine. In Atlanta, it’s a day of scattered thunderstorms and a high of sixty-four.
In 1869, it wasn’t easy — it was impossible, actually — for a woman to run the post office in Janesville, Wisconsin:
1845 – Angela Josephine King Born
On this date Angela Josephine King was born in Trumbull County, Ohio. She moved to Janesville in 1848 and graduated from the Janesville Ladies’ Seminary in 1867. King obtained a job as a clerk at the Janesville Post Office. In 1868 President U.S. Grant announced he would appoint a new postmaster in Janesville. A special election was held in February of 1869, with the understanding that the candidate who won the election would be endorsed by Congressman Benjamin Hopkins. King won the race by 42 votes and traveled to Washington to receive her appointment.
Hopkins balked at the idea of appointing a woman and innstead he gave the runner up, and his political rival James Burgess, his endorsement. As a result, King requested an interview with President Grant, but Grant refused to make the appointment without Hopkins’ endorsement. In the fall of 1871, Angela King attended Chicago Law School and returned home to Janesville to continue her study of the law.
In January of 1879, she was admitted to practice law in Rock County Circuit Court. Shortly thereafter, she and Rhoda Lavinia Goodell formed the partnership of Goodell and King, located next to the Janesville Post Office. Angela Josephine King continued to practice law in Janesville and served as an advocate for the women’s suffrage movement until her death in 1913. [Source: State Bar of Wisconsin]
20 Jan
Reviewing Pres. Obama’s First 2012 Campaign Ad » FREE WHITEWATER bit.ly/xqtv9x
19 Jan
The Overpowering Fear of a Sports Bar freewhitewater.com/?p=19912 #nannystate
19 Jan
Reviewing Kathleen Falk’s Recall Campaign Announcement freewhitewater.com/?p=19898 #wirecall #kathleenfalk
19 Jan
Why WisDems benefit from a recall primary freewhitewater.com/?p=19904
18 Jan
Local Politics of a Whitewater Schools Referendum » FREE WHITEWATER bit.ly/wi5puG
18 Jan
No word on whether he celebrated w round for everyone: Sheboygan Mayor Ryan survives recall primary shebpr.es/xU9u4N
17 Jan
The Pickleback: Shot of Jameson’s with shot of pickle juice as chaser Delicious Really
17 Jan
Understatement of the Day: ‘Next phases of recall process likely to be more difficult’ bit.ly/xDTDU2
16 Jan
Insipid headline: ‘Towering legend, flawed man? Image of Martin Luther King Jr. evolving’ True of anyone shebpr.es/ywWq7k
YouTube poster vmpickle123 offers a brief description of the cartoon:
A Cartoon Travesty of THE RAVEN by Edgar Allan Poe.
Released April 3, 1942 on two reels.
Animation directed by Tom Johnson.
Voices by Jack Mercer and Pinto Colvig.
Possibly narrated by Sam Parker – who voiced Gulliver in the 1939 Fleischer feature “Gulliver’s Travels.”
For more information, see the Internet Movie Database entry.
There’s an interview on Wisconsin Public Television that news anchor Frederica Freyberg conducts with Kathleen Falk, a declared challenger to Scott Walker in a recall campaign. It’s well-worth watching, and I have embedded the program below.
I’ve reviewed Falk’s video announcement, and this interview reveals some of the same problems of delivery and presentation that the former Dane County Executive exhibited in her campaign ad. She’s simply not up to a campaign like this, and I’m sure that Democrats in a recall primary will see that, too.
Watch Interview with possible recall challenger Kathleen Falk on PBS. See more from Here and Now.
Quick aside on WPT: A small ad accompanies the interview on the WPT website — “Funding for Here and Now is provided in part by Animal Dentistry and Oral Surgery Specialists, LLC.” That’s the right approach; public television should solicit ads. more >>
Pres. Obama’s released his first campaign commercial of the 2012 election.
Here are impressions of the commercial (playing in Wisconsin), embedded below. They address the politics, and not the merits, of Obama’s message.
Video quality. As one might expect at this level, the video looks great — sharp, with brisk pacing, and a good mix of photos and video clips. It’s a big step up from statewide or local campaign ads. No surprise there.
Video message. The ad starts abruptly, and defensively. That cannot be by accident, as it starts so abruptly that it’s meant to address a particular concern in a particular way for a particular purpose.
The particular concern: that Obama has fumbled on green energy, in way that may also be unethical. The particular way: by presenting criticism of Obama as part of a billionaire’s conspiracy. The particular purpose: to test themes in a battleground state, while the GOP is still picking a nominee. There’s a conspiratorial cast to the early part of the commercial that’s probably of interest to Team Obama — how helpful is it it answer criticism by impugning critics as shadowy, big-moneyed, corporate oligarchs?
They likely know what focus groups think, but how do prospective voters (and Democratic leaders) where these ads run feel, before and after the commercials?
Will this ad allow Obama to inoculate himself from charges in a conservative commercial that hit him over companies like Solyndra?
Narration. The ad uses a narrator, and he sounds fine — middle-aged, confident, but understated. That’s the right approach — a deeper, more assertive voice isn’t needed, and would be counterproductive. Pres. Obama seeks to convey greater reliability than his GOP rival; as an incumbent, he can make that case without narration that rattles one’s stereo speakers.
If I thought that this were something other an in-market test message, I’d think it too abrupt, and a failure. This commercial’s like a large-scale drug trial: does it stop the lethal spread of criticism over mishandling of green-energy funding?
Too many trial messages like this are a bad idea, but one here or there will be more helpful than harmful. If they succeed with voters, their themes can be repeated in the months ahead. If they’re failures, they’ll be forgotten before the Republicans have their nominee.
But, for a fully-cooked campaign ad from the Obama campaign, we’ll have to wait. This isn’t it, and it’s not meant to be.
I mentioned that I would write a bit about the Williamsburg neighborhood. Brooklyn’s huge (millions of residents) and there are many neighborhoods (themselves large) within that borough. One of them is Williamsburg, a diverse and eclectic community, with both Hasidim and hipsters, and a thriving arts scene.
These groups within the neighborhood do not always get along. As one can guess, the Hasidim don’t like the hipster bars and social scene. (It is, reportedly, from one of those bars that the Pickleback originated.)
And yet, there they both are, and neither has effectively prevented the growth of the other, nor evicted the other. No one in Williamsburg has successfully placed a finger on government’s scale, assuring that only his or her own kind will live there.
These two groups — and many more people who are part of neither — are all residents of the same, large neighborhood.
They’ve had their share of tensions, but they’ve gone on, and done well for themselves, despite these problems.
It’s a characteristic of successful people that they thrive in many environments, and that they focus on their own accomplishments rather than on limiting and restricting others.
In this regard, so much of Old Whitewater is a failure: a few people patting others’ backs, while doing what they can to limit, inhibit, restrict, and prevent.
I sometimes think that Whitewater’s town squires would rather that the town be perpetually struggling and miserable rather than that there should be greater prosperity with a new and different atmosphere. (More particularly: if a few people feel like they’re doing well enough as things are, they don’t really give a damn if the rest of the town scrapes by, or even declines.)
Too much noise, too much fuss, too much energy, too much commotion: this is what these tired and dull officials will not brook. What they really fear is the energy and dynamism of new people, new ideas, new opportunities. They don’t want anything new that they cannot control, manage, or administer.
The problem, though, is that what they can control, manage, or administer isn’t nearly as good as what new people, new ideas, and new opportunities offer free of control.
Nothing stays the same: Whitewater will either grow more prosperous or less, more vibrant or less, more open or less. The same won’t be the same – the same will be among the less and lesser.
I’m confident that — over time — Whitewater will prosper, as the other places have. How wasteful and sad will these times seem from the vantage of that time-to-come?
Wasteful and sad, indeed, I think.
I’ll leave aside the NFC for a bit, and ask an AFC question: Patriots or Ravens? The question’s intentionally ambiguous — one can answer for either the team one prefers, or the team one expects to win, should that require a different answer.
Fox Point Patch has a poll of the Most Popular Cat Names. Janine Anderson writes that
Lucy, Smokey, Bella, Charlie and Tiger were the top 5 most popular cat names for adoptable cats in 2011, according Petfinder.com. Rounding out the list were Oreo, Daisy, Molly, Max and Midnight.
Those are all good names, but of that list, I’d go for Smokey, Tiger, or Max as preferred choices. No name, though, could top Suzie, a great name for a great cat.