FREE WHITEWATER

Recent Tweets, 11.25 to 12.1

Sunday Morning Cartoon: The Snow Man (1940)

John Oakes offers a succinct description of the plot: “A group of furry South Pole animals build a snow man. They begin to throw snowballs at it. This make him come to life and oh what a vengence he has. Stomps around scaring the living daylights out of everyone. How will they stop him?”

The IMDB also catches a continuity goof at approx. 4:50 in the cartoon: “When the snow man sits down at the church organ, the stovepipe on his head disappears. It reappears in the next scene.”

Daily Bread for 12.2.12

Good morning.

Whitewater’s Sunday looks to be cloudy with gradual clearing, and a high of fifty-four. We’ll have 9h 14m of sunlight, and 10h 17m of daylight. Tomorrow will be one minute shorter/.

On this day in 1954, the U.S. Senate voted to censure Wisconsin Senator Joe McCarthy. Here’s how the New York Times reported McCarthy’s politically fatal day:

Washington, Dec 2–The Senate voted 67 to 22 tonight to condemn Joseph R. McCarthy, Republican Senator from Wisconsin.

Every one of the forty-four Democrats present voted against Mr. McCarthy. The Republicans were evenly divided–twenty-two for condemnation and twenty-two against. The one independent, Senator Wayne Morse of Oregon, also voted against Mr. McCarthy.

In the ultimate action the Senate voted to condemn Senator McCarthy for contempt of a Senate Elections subcommittee that investigated his conduct and financial affairs, for abuse of its members, and for his insults to the Senate itself during the censure proceeding.

Google’s puzzle for today brings a geography puzzle: “What “autonomous region” includes nine major islands and an islet cluster, in three main groups?”

Daily Bread for 12.1.12

Good morning.

It’s an even chance of Saturday rain for Whitewater, with a high of fifty-two.

On this day in 1824, Congress decides the outcome of a presidential election:

….Congress acts to decide a presidential election for the first time in history, giving the presidency to John Quincy Adams. A clause in the Constitution’s 12th Amendment puts the power of deciding an election in the hands of Congress if no candidate receives a majority of the Electoral College votes….

On Election Day, Adams and Jackson led the pack in electoral votes, but Clay and Crawford had garnered enough votes to prevent either from winning a majority. Adams received 84 electoral votes; Jackson won 99. By the terms of the 12th Amendment, Congress was tasked with deciding between the two candidates, who could not have been more different in style or policy. Adams, described by his opponents as a cold, calculating Yankee elitist contrasted with Jackson, who was portrayed (not inaccurately) as hot-headed and hell-bent on destroying federal institutions (such as the National Bank) that George Washington and the Federalists had worked hard to establish.

In the end, Speaker Clay used his influence to convince fellow lawmakers to cast their vote for Adams and he emerged victorious. Not surprisingly, Adams chose Henry Clay to be his secretary of state, an act that enraged Jackson and helped to unite what had been a fragmented Democratic Party. In the election of 1828, Jackson easily beat the incumbent Adams, and went on to serve until 1837.

On 12.1.1884, a fire changed life (temporarily) for students at UW-Madison:

1884 – Fire Destroys UW Building
On this date fire destroyed Science Hall on the UW-Madison campus. As a result, engineering students were forced to use the cramped space of the former dormitory, North Hall, for the next four semesters. [Source: College of Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison]

From Google’s daily puzzle, a question of bio-science: “What animal uses several layers of chromataphores to change its color based on its emotional state?”

 

Friday Poll: Whitewater’s first accumulated snowfall in the 2012-13 season?

Here’s a 2012-2013 version of a poll first published last year: when will Whitewater see her first accumulated snowfall in the 2012-13 season?

It’s mild weather ahead for the weekend, but when will that change into an appreciable snowfall? (Let’s call an appreciable snowfall at least one inch.) Comments are available, including for those outside the city who’d like to predict for their own communities.

My guess for Whitewater: December 23rd.

What do you think?




Whitewater’s Annual Holly Days Events

Tonight’s Whitewater’s annual Christmas parade, at 6 PM, beginning at Main & Whiton, traveling down Main, and turning on Whitewater Street toward the Cravath lakefront. Downtown Whitewater is the parade’s sponsor.

There’s a parade, of course, yet even more awaiting: live storytelling, hot chocolate for sale, gingerbread house decorating, roasted chestnuts, the Whitewater Chamber’s open house and raffle, a gingerbread house decorating workshop, and a collection for charity through 12.7. Clicking the list of activities below produces a full-size flyer.

Daily Bread for 11.30.12

Good morning.

Whitewater’s week ends with mostly cloudy skies and a high of forty-eight.

Tonight at 6 PM, Whitewater will hold her annual Holly Days Christmas Parade, beginning at Main & Whiton, traveling down Main, and turning on Whitewater Street toward the Cravath lakefront.

On this day in 1954, a truly rare misfortune befalls Mrs. Elizabeth Hodges of Alabama:

The first modern instance of a meteorite striking a human being occurs at Sylacauga, Alabama, when a meteorite crashes through the roof of a house and into a living room, bounces off a radio, and strikes a woman on the hip. The victim, Mrs. Elizabeth Hodges, was sleeping on a couch at the time of impact. The space rock was a sulfide meteorite weighing 8.5 pounds and measuring seven inches in length. Mrs. Hodges was not permanently injured but suffered a nasty bruise along her hip and leg.

Ancient Chinese records tell of people being injured or killed by falling meteorites, but the Sylacauga meteorite was the first modern record of this type of human injury. In 1911, a dog in Egypt was killed by the Nakhla meteorite.

Google’s daily puzzle asks about a famous canine: “In 2005, Variety magazine issued its list of “100 Icons of the Century.” What was the name of only canine entry on the list?”

The Game of Thrones Food Trucks

The Institute of Justice, the nation’s leading libertarian public interest law firm, asks a question about Chicago that would be as fitting of other cities’ regulators:

Should the city of Chicago be in the business of protecting a few politically connected restaurateurs from competition?

That is the question to be answered by a major lawsuit filed Wednesday, November 14, 2012, in Cook County Circuit Court by the Institute for Justice (IJ)—a national public interest law firm—and three Chicago-area food truck entrepreneurs.

Cities nationwide are experiencing the benefits of food trucks. But for years Chicago had not embraced that movement. For example, Chicago did not allow cooking on food trucks and it told food truck entrepreneurs that they must stay more than 200 feet from brick-and-mortar restaurants. So in June 2012, when the city announced it would be revising its vending laws, food fans were excited.

The law that passed in July, however, continues to make it illegal for food trucks to operate within 200 feet of any fixed business that serves food. The fines for violating the 200-foot rule are up to $2,000—ten times higher than for parking in front of a fire hydrant. Further, the city is forcing food trucks to install GPS tracking devices that broadcast the trucks’ every move. According to the Chicago Tribune, “the ordinance doesn’t serve the needs of the lunch-seeking public. It benefits the brick-and-mortar eateries, whose owners don’t want the competition.”

Posted also at Daily Adams.

Daily Bread for 11.29.12

Good morning.

Thursday brings a sunny day and a high of forty-eight to Whitewater.

This afternoon at 4:30 PM, Whitewater’s Community Development Authority meets.

On this day in 1942 as World War II raged, rationing hit Americans in a specific way:

On this day in 1942, coffee joins the list of items rationed in the United States. Despite record coffee production in Latin American countries, the growing demand for the bean from both military and civilian sources, and the demands placed on shipping, which was needed for other purposes, required the limiting of its availability.

Scarcity or shortages were rarely the reason for rationing during the war. Rationing was generally employed for two reasons: (1) to guarantee a fair distribution of resources and foodstuffs to all citizens; and (2) to give priority to military use for certain raw materials, given the present emergency.

At first, limiting the use of certain products was voluntary. For example, President Roosevelt launched “scrap drives” to scare up throwaway rubber-old garden hoses, tires, bathing caps, etc.–in light of the Japanese capture of the Dutch East Indies, a source of rubber for the United States. Collections were then redeemed at gas stations for a penny a pound. Patriotism and the desire to aid the war effort were enough in the early days of the war.

But as U.S. shipping, including oil tankers, became increasingly vulnerable to German U-boat attacks, gas became the first resource to be rationed. Starting in May 1942, in 17 eastern states, car owners were restricted to three gallons of gas a week. By the end of the year, gas rationing extended to the rest of the country, requiring drivers to paste ration stamps onto the windshields of their cars. Butter was another item rationed, as supplies were reserved for military breakfasts. Along with coffee, the sugar and milk that went with it were also limited. All together, about one-third of all food commonly consumed by civilians was rationed at one time or another during the war. The black market, an underground source of rationed goods at prices higher than the ceilings set by the Office of Price Administration, was a supply source for those Americans with the disposable incomes needed to pay the inflated prices.

Some items came off the rationing list early; coffee was released as early as July 1943, but sugar was rationed until June 1947.

Google’s daily puzzle asks a history question: “Only one man was twice honored with the “Thanks of Congress” during the Civil War. To what rank was this individual promoted after the war?”

Starting Backwards

Local governments find themselves, time and again, surprised when projects don’t go to plan. They’re often surprised when the politics of a project don’t go to plan.

That surprise may have a hundred causes, but I’d guess one is among the most common: that plans advance not on their merits, but through ill-considered deals between large organizations. Rather than look first at what someone’s proposing, some officials look to see if the proposal begins with another organization they support, need, or (sadly) fear.

It’s not the contents, but container, that determines how many officials line up behind an issue. If planners were always of the highest quality, and if they were infallible of judgment, then relying on past performance would be prudent. But, they’re not and not.

The impressionable, the over-awed, those who are mad for a place at table no matter how poor the fare, they’re the ones who will ignore contents for containers.

Did the idea come from another official? Back it, as we of government are all in this together.

Did the plan come from a big institution? Push it, as we can’t afford to question these (so-called) people of influence.

Support like this is almost a reflex, as mechanically predictable as the jerk of a leg following a tap by a rubber hammer.

Speak to this ilk in a certain way, and they’ll yield to just about anything. Obi Wan, while in Mos Eisley, used a jedi mind trick of this sort on storm troopers looking for two particular droids.

It’s better to start from the other direction, with a person and a well-conceived idea, the product of thought, study, experience, and later testing. One takes the plan – properly fleshed-out – and then presents it to others after all that work of thought, study, experience, and later testing.

One can quickly see the difference between these approaches. The institutional approach lines up supposedly big fish after big fish, but they’ll offer nothing but generalities or vague answers. That’s because they’re not asking for support on the merits, but expecting support from a sense of entitlement. That world’s nature: vague but demanding.

The individual approach begins with a well-formed idea, and it’s on the basis of specific and clear propositions that the planner seeks to convince others. This other world’s nature: thorough and persuasive.

A place without opportunity for review and scrutiny will favor the institutional but mediocre approach. A place of scrutiny and criticism will tend toward the more considered approach.

Starting backwards leaves a community finishing last.

Whitewater’s flowing down the long, but inexorable, course from the institutional to the individual approaches. Some people will be left behind, if they’ll not adjust, but many more will thrive.