City, Development, Economy, Local Government, Poverty
Assessing the Poverty Data for Our Area
by JOHN ADAMS •
On Friday, I posted on child poverty in our area. The Great Recession took a toll on many cities, but undeniably so in ours: from 2007 to 2011, the number of children aged 5 to 17 in families in poverty rose from 9.89 to 17.9%.
The number nearly doubled. Beyond that group, state measures classify an astounding 44% of all school-age children in our area (the city and other towns in our school district) as economically disadvantaged.
A few remarks on the data.
1. These numbers involve only school-age children; they do not include non-working college students.
2. Of nearby communities, the Whitewater area has the second-highest level of child poverty, and the second-highest rate of increase, from 2007-2011 (81%). She’s also the only community whose poverty rate does not abate as the Great Recession ends. Instead, it rises year over year.
3. I’ve picked 2007-2011 for a reason – all communities during this time felt the impact of recession, but in these years Whitewater was also a place of grandiose claims of innovation, development, the exceptional, the unrivaled, etc.
And yet, and yet, for all these many headlines and pronouncements about progress, groundbreaking accomplishments, and world-class achievements, the actual material condition of children in the city grew worse, year over year.
4. Not a single project during these years, not a single government-funded ‘partnership’ with the university or major corporations stopped the rise in our area’s child poverty – the rate rose anyway.
5. ‘Poverty alleviated or prevented.’ As with much spending, one is sure to hear that the situation would have been worse had we not spent on buildings for white-collar projects, or extended tax-breaks and public money to thriving corporations.
There’s neither evidence nor even any compelling analysis for such claims – it’s just airy speculation. The only concrete result of which one can be confident is that Whitewater spent public money for big development projects but the material condition of many residents grew worse.
6. Optimism, in spite of these last several years. For it all, I’m convinced that Whitewater can and will do far better, and that greater prosperity for greater numbers lies ahead. It’s going to take a rejection of ‘if-you-build-it-they-will-come’ thinking and a refocus on projects that make small gains, including for small businesses over corporate and white-collar welfare projects that haven’t produced results for those most in need.
7. Solutions. I’ll write at length In November about solutions that have worked elsewhere, to turn other towns around. (There’s still more to consider before then about Whitewater’s long-term fiscal account, and about particular budget items for the coming fiscal year.)
It won’t be easy, but I believe we’ll make the transition away from big-but-empty in the coming decade. In part, we’ll do so because we’ll embrace new ideas, and in part because we’ll have reached the end of the pretend, with tired, flamboyant claims no longer able to convince anyone.
For tomorrow, though, a story about how desperation (something we certainly needn’t feel about our own situation) clouds judgment.
Tomorrow: What a Film About Janesville Really Says.
Holiday, Music
Monday Music: Werewolves of London
by JOHN ADAMS •
Daily Bread
Daily Bread for 10.28.13
by JOHN ADAMS •
Good morning.
Whitewater’s week begins with sprinkles and a high of forty-six. Sunrise is 7:23 AM and sunset will be 5:54 PM.
On this day in 1886, Pres. Cleveland dedicates the Statue of Liberty. The New York Times covered the ceremony:
The statue of Liberty yesterday was seen through a mist darkly. Piercing winds blew around Bedlow’s Island, and the numerous workmen, who were not in any way protected from the weather, worked uncomfortably. The speakers’ stand, and that for the use of musicians above it, were in readiness yesterday. Planks were removed and a semblance of tidiness was given to the island. A big barge, which looked extremely dismal, with its legend in red characters, “Eat, drink, and be merry,” stood at the Bedlow’s Island dock to land visitors. It will be used for that purpose this afternoon.

Sadly, the public could not attend the event on the island:
No members of the general public were permitted on the island during the ceremonies, which were reserved entirely for dignitaries. The only females granted access were Bartholdi’s wife and de Lesseps’s granddaughter; officials stated that they feared women might be injured in the crush of people. The restriction offended area suffragists, who chartered a boat and got as close as they could to the island. The group’s leaders made speeches applauding the embodiment of Liberty as a woman and advocating women’s right to vote.[98] A scheduled fireworks display was postponed until November 1 because of poor weather.[100]
On this day in 1936, a vice-presidential candidate argues against the practices of his era:
1936 – Vice Presidential Candidate Stumps in Janesville
On this date, during a whistlestop speech in Janesville, Republican Vice Presidential candidate Frank W. Knox charged the FDR Administration with corruption and cronyism in an impassioned campaign speech to approximately 1,100 residents. [Source: Janesville Gazette 10/28/1936, p.1]
Scientific American‘s daily trivia question asks about hurricanes. (Clicking on the question leads to its answer.)
During what months does the North Atlantic hurricane season run?
Film, Holiday
Tuesday, October 29th: Creature Double Feature @ Starin Seniors in the Park
by JOHN ADAMS •
Cartoons & Comics
Sunday Morning Cartoon: A Modern Version of Mickey Mouse’s 1929 Haunted House
by JOHN ADAMS •
Here’s a modern version of a 1929 Mickey Mouse video. The original’s entitled Halloween House, and this version adds a contemporary soundtrack.
Enjoy.
Daily Bread
Daily Bread for 10.27.13
by JOHN ADAMS •
Good morning.
We’ll have a sunny day with a high of fifty-six, and southwest winds of 5 to 15 mph.
Sometimes a hard call is still a correct and right one. Last night, in Game 3 of the World Series, third-base umpire Jim Joyce called Obstruction (Official Rules of Major League Baseball, Section 2.00 Definition of Terms) of on Boston’s Will Middlebrooks, and since Allen Craig was close at home anyway, the obstruction call gave the win to St. Louis, 5-4. So, for the first time in World Series history, a game was decided on an obstruction call.
There’s general agreement – although perhaps not as much in Boston – that the call was the right one. It was:
It ended on an obstruction call, and what appears, pretty much indisputably, to be a correct obstruction call, made by third-base umpire Jim Joyce on Red Sox third baseman Will Middlebrooks.
And here’s the most important thing you need to know about that call: It doesn’t matter if Middlebrooks intended to interfere with the Cardinals’ Allen Craig or not. Got that?
It. Doesn’t. Matter.
It doesn’t matter that Middlebrooks was just doing everything he could to catch an uncatchable throw to third by catcher Jarrod Saltalamacchia.
It doesn’t matter that that throw led Middlebrooks right into the runner, and that it was basically unavoidable that he found himself lying in the dirt, flat on his belly, as Craig was trying to scramble to his feet and race home.
Here, the umpires explain the call:
Baseball is an old and established sport, but that doesn’t mean there aren’t new things to see. There are – every night, and especially on a night like last night.
Daily Bread
Daily Bread for 10.26.13
by JOHN ADAMS •
Good morning.
Saturday in Whitewater will be a day of partly sunny skies, a high of fifty, and winds of 15 to 20 mph.
Perhaps, for Halloween, you’d like to design some unusual graphics, of strange and imaginary creatures. Mashable has tips on how to Photoshop ordinary animal photos into ones of imaginary animals: How to Photoshop Hybrid Animals. (One doesn’t need Photoshop; other photo-editing programs have similar features. They’ve an accompanying link to the 9 Best Free Image Editors.)
When you’re done, you could have hybrid like this Corgi-Sloth from Mashable:

It’s the anniversary of a famous gunfight:
On this day in 1881, the Earp brothers face off against the Clanton-McLaury gang in a legendary shootout at the OK Corral in Tombstone, Arizona…
Around 3 p.m., the Earps and Holliday spotted the five members of the Clanton-McLaury gang in a vacant lot behind the OK Corral, at the end of Fremont Street. The famous gunfight that ensued lasted all of 30 seconds, and around 30 shots were fired. Though it’s still debated who fired the first shot, most reports say that the shootout began when Virgil Earp pulled out his revolver and shot Billy Clanton point-blank in the chest, while Doc Holliday fired a shotgun blast at Tom McLaury’s chest. Though Wyatt Earp wounded Frank McLaury with a shot in the stomach, Frank managed to get off a few shots before collapsing, as did Billy Clanton. When the dust cleared, Billy Clanton and the McLaury brothers were dead, and Virgil and Morgan Earp and Doc Holliday were wounded. Ike Clanton and Claiborne had run for the hills.
Sheriff John Behan of Cochise County, who witnessed the shootout, charged the Earps and Holliday with murder. A month later, however, a Tombstone judge found the men not guilty, ruling that they were “fully justified in committing these homicides.” The famous shootout has been immortalized in many movies, including Frontier Marshal (1939), Gunfight at the OK Corral (1957), Tombstone (1993) and Wyatt Earp (1994).
City, Poverty
Poverty in Our Area
by JOHN ADAMS •
Using data from the U.S. Census Bureau’s Small Area Income and Poverty Estimates, for children aged 5 to 17 in families in poverty, rate as a percentage of all children that age:
| Delavan-Darien | Edgerton | Elkhorn Area | Fort Atkinson | Jefferson | Milton | Whitewater Area | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 10.98 | 7.10 | 11.60 | 7.01 | 8.05 | 5.4 | 9.89 |
| 2008 | 11.90 | 8.22 | 15.28 | 8.78 | 8.62 | 5.71 | 10.54 |
| 2009 | 15.43 | 9.29 | 15.21 | 11.39 | 10.1 | 6.65 | 14.22 |
| 2010 | 22.17 | 9.62 | 9.71 | 13.79 | 12.28 | 8.94 | 16.29 |
| 2011 | 19.46 | 9.33 | 10.80 | 13.52 | 12.13 | 7.83 | 17.9 |
| Change | +77.2% | +31.4% | -9.31% | +92.8% | +50.7% | +45% | +81% |
Quick Notes:
- Communities measured are school districts.
- Same standard is applied to each community, for each year.
- 2011 is latest year available.
- Date range immediately precedes and follows the Great Recession.
- All communities but two see a rate decline from 2010 to 2011 (even if slight) in child poverty after the recession ends. Only Elkhorn and Whitewater do not see a lessening in the rate; of those two cities, Whitewater is higher in 2011 over 2007 while Elkhorn’s 2011 rate is lower than her 2007 rate. Only Whitewater increases each year.
- The data above are poverty data (that is, a dire category of deprivation). The same Whitewater area also suffers, among children aged 5 to 17, economic disadvantage amounting to 44% of all such school-age children.
Monday: Assessing the Poverty Data for Our Area.
Cats, Weird Tales
Friday Catbloging: Drug-Smuggling Cat
by JOHN ADAMS •
Holiday, Poll
Friday Poll: Favorite Halloween Monster
by JOHN ADAMS •

It’s the last Friday before Halloween, so a poll about Halloween monsters – which do you think is the greatest Halloween scare (or, if not scariest, then most interesting)? What’s your favorite?
I’d say zombies, I suppose, with werewolves a close second. What do you think? (Multiple answers are possible.)
Daily Bread
Daily Bread for 10.25.13
by JOHN ADAMS •
Good morning.
The works week ends with a sunny Friday and a high of forty-six.
On October 25, 1774, America tries to be reasonable:
On this day in 1774, the First Continental Congress sends a respectful petition to King George III to inform his majesty that if it had not been for the acts of oppression forced upon the colonies by the British Parliament, the American people would be standing behind British rule.
Despite the anger that the American public felt towards the United Kingdom after the British Parliament established the Coercive Acts—called the Intolerable Acts by the colonists—Congress was still willing to assert its loyalty to the king. In return for this loyalty, Congress asked the king to address and resolve the specific grievances of the colonies. The petition, written by Continental Congressman John Dickinson, laid out what Congress felt was undo oppression of the colonies by the British Parliament. Their grievances mainly had to do with the Coercive Acts, a series of four acts that were established to punish colonists and to restore order in Massachusetts following the Boston Tea Party.
On October 25, 1836, a first for the Wisconsin territory:
1836 – Belmont-Wisconsin Territory 1836 Established
On this date the first legislative session of the Wisconsin territory convened in Belmont, Wisconsin. During this first session, forty-two laws were put in the statute books. At this time, the Territory of Wisconsin included all of present-day Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, and part of the two Dakotas.
Scientific American‘s daily trivia question asks about tornadoes. (Clicking on the question leads to its answer.)
How many categories of tornado exist, according to the Fujita Scale?
Technology
The Secret Features of OS X Mavericks
by JOHN ADAMS •
Most Mac users have available to them a free update to OS X, named Mavericks. (Inexplicably, they’ve stopped naming new versions of OS X after cats.)
Lifehacker offers a video with information on features of Mavericks about which OS X users might not otherwise be aware.
City, Economy, Poverty
A City’s Most Important Economic Measure
by JOHN ADAMS •
Yesteday, I asked, “What’s Whitewater’s Economy?” If it should be true – and it is – that a genuine economic discussion is more than a budgetary one, then what economic measures should matter most?
There’s no single measurement that explains it all, but what would one say about an economy if one were compelled to pick just one measurement of performance?
I’ll suggest that one begins by asking a simple question: what’s the poverty rate? It begins with asking how many poor people there are in a community.
One confirms a community’s fundamental economic success when one discovers that there are few who are poor; one finds a community’s fundamental economic failure when one discovers a high poverty rate.
I’ll contend that there is no escape from seeing things this way, except the immoral utilitarianism of choosing a society of few with vast wealth over many, many more with nothing. A well-functioning market economy brings opportunity and success to many, not merely a few.
An evaluation would proceed this way: is poverty uncommon (as one hopes it would be)? If so, then one goes on to look at other economic criteria by which to assess the community’s performance. These would include conventional measurements of employment, inflation, per capita income, trends among these, etc.
But if poverty should be high, absolutely or relatively to other places, one already has one’s initial and disappointing answer – a community with a high poverty rate is, by this definition, struggling and failing.
There may be a tendency to blame people for their own condition, but I find this claim unpersuasive: in a society like America with free flows of capital, goods, and labor, communities have ample access to talent and resources. American communities’ economic failures are more likely to be leadership failures, of establishing a well-ordered and competitive marketplace.
That a tiny number of people might possibly be poor by choice or by unchosen disability hardly explains widespread poverty. It’s more excuse than explanation for a high poverty rate.
Quick notes:
1. I’m well aware that poverty in America means something quite different from poverty in the Third World. The measures about which I am discussing are city-to-city within America.
2. The definition of poverty in America has changed, over time, and is subject to debate. No matter: for this discussion, the comparisons that matter to me are those that apply the same criteria, for the same time periods, between American places. (An example would be comparisons for a common year, using the same criteria, between cities and towns.)
Tomorrow: Poverty in Our Area.

