FREE WHITEWATER

The Failure of Marketing (and the Marketing of Failure)

I respect the work of those honest people who practice or study marketing. There’s a place for marketing, and even a place for marketing public projects. In the end, though, it’s the product or service, not the presentation of it, that matters most.

There should be nothing startling in so declaring, but for the marketeers of public projects to say as much is unwelcome. There are any number of men and women who will insist that presentation is everything, and that if one can simply describe a thing in an effective way, it will be – necessarily – an effective thing.

Still, a thing is not the description, presentation, characterization, spin, selling, relationship-building, or marketing, etc., of it.

That’s the failure of marketing: that it cannot make a truly bad thing good, as it cannot compellingly refute the irreducible distinction between object and description.

Those who are manipulative marketeers would deny this claim of failure as naive, as an underestimation of their supposed powers. Clever, glib men believe that anything can be sold. Anything.

They exalt the power of marketing, and so they’ll market even failure, describing it as success.

They are practitioners of a would-be, modern-day alchemy – the transformation of lead into gold. The actual project matters less, for example, than how a sycophantic reporter describes it, because the parroted headline, itself, turns coal into a diamond.

One might be looking, for example, at a multi-million-dollar shell (waste at public expense), but if one glances aside for even a moment at a toady’s fawning words, to look back is to see the Taj Mahal.

That’s why advocates of just about every big public project devote ample time to how they’ll market their latest and (assuredly!) greatest.

It’s as though they saw Wag the Dog, with its satire of political spin, and thought that it was a how-to guide for legitimate policy.

To the gentlemen who think that repeating the same false claims eight or even eighteen times, believing that so doing transforms dross into fine alloys, or beguiles others into believing in that transformation: such repetition neither transforms nor beguiles. A good thing sells itself.

One need only examine the projects themselves, objectively and against the claims made on their behalf, to see the fundamental truth.

Next: How You, Too, Can Be a Smooth-Talking, Super-Sophisticated Marketeer (Assuming You’d Be Foolish Enough to Want to Be One).

Daily Bread for 7.25.13

Good morning.

Thursday in Whitewater will be increasingly cloudy with a high of seventy-eight. We’ll have an even chance of thunderstorms tonight.

Whitewater’s Tech Park Board meets this morning at 8 AM, and at 7 PM there will be a Police and Fire Commission meeting with members of Common Council in attendance.

CNN offers a a dog meets (same) dog story:

On this day in 1897, Jack London begins a fateful trip:

Jack London leaves for the Klondike to join the gold rush, where he will write his first successful stories….

From an early age, London struggled to make a living, working in a cannery and as a sailor, oyster pirate, and fish patroller. During the national economic crisis of 1893, he joined a march of unemployed workers. He was jailed for vagrancy for a month, during which time he decided to go to college. The 17-year-old London completed a high school equivalency course and enrolled at the University of California at Berkeley, where he read voraciously for a year. However, he dropped out to join the 1897 gold rush.

While in the Klondike, London began submitting stories to magazines. In 1900, his first collection of stories, The Son of the Wolf, was published. Three years later, his story The Call of the Wild made him famous around the country. London continued to write stories of adventure amid the harsh natural elements. During his 17-year career, he wrote 50 fiction and nonfiction books. He settled in northern California about 1911, having already written most of his best work. London, a heavy drinker, died in 1916.

On this day in 1999, a new member of the Hall of Fame:

1999 – First Brewer Inducted into Hall of Fame
On this date Robin Yount became the first player inducted to the Baseball Hall of Fame in a Brewer’s jersey. Yount entered the major leagues at the age of eighteen and spent his entire career with the Milwaukee Brewers as number 19 at short stop and center field. His awards are numerous, including being selected as an all-star three times as well as American league MVP twice. [Source: Milwaukee Brewers]

Puzzability’s current series is called Sun Screens:

Sun Screens
If you can’t stand the heat, we’ve got just the ticket. For each day this week, we’ll give a three-by-three letter grid in which we’ve hidden the title of a movie that’s set during the summer. Each has 10 or more letters and any number of words. To find the title, start at any letter and move from letter to letter by traveling to any adjacent letter—across, up and down, or diagonally. You may come back to a letter you’ve used previously, but may not stay in the same spot twice in a row. You will not always need all nine letters in the grid.

Example:
F S U
O M A
R E M

Answer:
Summer of Sam

Here’s Thursday’s puzzle:

W G X
D N O
E L P

Bad Policy Cannot Hold the City

If one can count The Three Ways Policy Goes Wrong and if one can answer the question If Policy Goes Bad in Three Basic Ways, What Should Be Done About It?, where does that leave the city?

It leaves the city, over time, better off: bad policy cannot hold the city.

There are only so many times that a few can insist that pigs’ ears are silk purses. Those times are nearly used up, albeit at a vast cost.

This underlies optimism: that experience itself refutes past and present claims in favor of big-ticket, but bad-policy, solutions.

That’s an uncomfortable spot for the advocates of the big projects of the past, but a good spot for Whitewater.

If Policy Goes Bad in Three Basic Ways, What Should Be Done About It?

If policy goes bad in one of three principal ways, then are the solutions to errors as easily stated (and brought into effect)? (See, from yesterday, The Three Ways Policy Goes Wrong.)

Most of the time, there are.

If the errors are from bad information or bad ideas, then positive change isn’t so hard. One simply contends and contends again, with a marketplace of ideas gradually replacing poor information or poor ideas with better ones.

This is the most common problem of policy, and it’s (fortunately) most easily managed.

If the mistakes are from the rarer case of bad motives, then there’s a different approach. That’s because bad information or bad ideas can be overcome easily in currently-serving policymakers, but those who are mired in bad motives are resistant to change. These stubborn policymakers are best removed and replaced.

The most severe policy problems are of motive (and motivation), coming from laziness, a sense of entitlement, needy self-promotion, and excuse-making. A sense of entitlement will get a community the also-independent wrong of conflicts of interest. (Fortunately, few bad motives involve bigotry or outright theft, wrongs one sees only infrequently by comparison with other problems of motive.)

As for the problems of this third kind, there’s a longer slog against stubborn policymakers of junk policy and sub-par performance. Bad loses to good (or at least better) in a free society. That’s why one can, reasonably, be an optimist about policy in America.

But truly troubled policymakers (Eliot Spitzer, Anthony Weiner among national figures of the moment) won’t go away. They’ll keep trying again and again as long as they’re ambulatory, and are beyond persuasion of fact or idea. If they retreat, it’s only to return again.

As they’re shameless, self-promoting, and gripped by their own outsized sense of entitlement, they’re simply resistant to ordinary reason or persuasion. Appealing to them, directly, is useless.

Instead, one commits to a long game, played each day, contending for a better way and critiquing rigorously the rotting produce of those very few that laziness, a sense of entitlement, needy self-promotion, or excuse-making has so powerfully and inescapably ensnared.

The supposed accomplishments of that ilk are, in any event, ephemeral, sham achievements. What they do rots and rusts, all the boasting in the world notwithstanding. Such is true nationally and locally.

That’s a commitment to a long game, but a winning one.

Daily Bread for 7.24.13

Good morning.

Midweek in Whitewater will be sunny and mild, with a high of seventy-three and calm winds.

Whitewater’s Fire & Rescue Task Force meets this morning at 9:30 AM.

614px-80_-_Machu_Picchu_-_Juin_2009_-_edit.2

On this day in 1911, American archeologist Hiram Bingham discovers the Inca settlement Machu Picchu:

Tucked away in the rocky countryside northwest of Cuzco, Machu Picchu is believed to have been a summer retreat for Inca leaders, whose civilization was virtually wiped out by Spanish invaders in the 16th century. For hundreds of years afterwards, its existence was a secret known only to the peasants living in the region. That all changed in the summer of 1911, when Bingham arrived with a small team of explorers to search for the famous “lost” cities of the Incas.

Traveling on foot and by mule, Bingham and his team made their way from Cuzco into the Urubamba Valley, where a local farmer told them of some ruins located at the top of a nearby mountain. The farmer called the mountain Machu Picchu, which meant “Old Peak” in the native Quechua language. The next day–July 24–after a tough climb to the mountain’s ridge in cold and drizzly weather, Bingham met a small group of peasants who showed him the rest of the way. Led by an 11-year-old boy, Bingham got his first glimpse of the intricate network of stone terraces marking the entrance to Machu Picchu.

Puzzability’s current series (7.22 to 7.26) is called Sun Screens:

Sun Screens
If you can’t stand the heat, we’ve got just the ticket. For each day this week, we’ll give a three-by-three letter grid in which we’ve hidden the title of a movie that’s set during the summer. Each has 10 or more letters and any number of words. To find the title, start at any letter and move from letter to letter by traveling to any adjacent letter—across, up and down, or diagonally. You may come back to a letter you’ve used previously, but may not stay in the same spot twice in a row. You will not always need all nine letters in the grid.

Example:
F S U
O M A
R E M

Answer:
Summer of Sam

Here’s Wednesday’s puzzle:

O E B
T H A
K C V

The Three Ways Policy Goes Wrong

How does public policy go wrong? I’m sure the answer’s not complicated.

There are a few principal ways, with all else being derivations: (1) bad information, (2) bad ideas, or (3) bad motives.

So either knowledge is poor, theory is poor, or ethics are poor.

I’ve organized the possibilities this way in order of severity, from least to most troublesome. Unsound information is most easily corrected, unsound theory some more difficulty, and unsound ethics with the most difficulty (if susceptible of correction at all).

Of ethics, a community may face either intentional misdeeds (lies, theft), objective conflicts of interest (self-dealing), or the occasional character flaw (laziness, a sense of entitlement, needy self-promotion, excuse-making, bigotry). One might separate character flaws into a fourth category, but I’ve classed them as ethical problems because their presence in matters of public policy acts as a cheat against the public, of resources or opportunity.

What’s missing here is an excuse for bad policy that is, in fact, almost never true: lack of intelligence. It’s not an excuse because the overwhelming number of people in a community don’t lack for intellect. There’s no immutable characteristic within a community, in fact, that inhibits good policy.

That’s true and fortunate, of course, as it means that there really is no good (insuperable) excuse for bad policy.

Posted also at Daily Adams.

Daily Bread for 7.23.13

Good morning.

Tuesday in Whitewater brings decreasing clouds and a high of seventy-five, with winds at 5 to 15 mph. Sunrise was at 5:37 AM, and sunset will be at 8:25 PM. The moon is in a waning gibbous phase with 98% of its visible disk illuminated.

Whitewater’s Urban Forestry Commission meets at 4:30 PM today.

NASA’s Cassini probe took pictures of the Earth from near Saturn, and the results are astonishing:

20130722_annotated_earth-moon_from_saturn_1920x1080

On this day in 1885, the death of a former president cuts short a serving vice president’s visit to Wisconsin:

1885 – U.S. Vice President Visits Ashland
On this date the untimely death of Ulysses S. Grant cut short Vice President Thomas Hendricks visit to Ashland. The Vice President arrived in Ashland via the steamship China in 1885. While Vice President Hendricks was in Ashland, he and his wife enjoyed trout caught in the Brule River and Fish Creek. [Source: “B” Book I, Beer Bottles, Brawls, Boards, Brothels, Bibles, Battles & Brownstone by Tony Woiak, p.11]

Puzzability’s current puzzle series (7.22 to 7.26) is called Sun Screens:

Sun Screens
If you can’t stand the heat, we’ve got just the ticket. For each day this week, we’ll give a three-by-three letter grid in which we’ve hidden the title of a movie that’s set during the summer. Each has 10 or more letters and any number of words. To find the title, start at any letter and move from letter to letter by traveling to any adjacent letter—across, up and down, or diagonally. You may come back to a letter you’ve used previously, but may not stay in the same spot twice in a row. You will not always need all nine letters in the grid.

Example:
F S U
O M A
R E M

Answer:
Summer of Sam

Here’s Tuesday’s puzzle:

R A I
E W N
Y D O

Succinctly Stated: ‘Imprison the Royal Family and Abolish the Monarchy’

606x341_223764_prince-charles-attends-opening-of-u

One wishes the Royal Baby, of whatever name he shall be christened, a long and happy life. But life would be better, for that young child, and all his country, if he were not a royal baby, but just a baby. Hamilton Nolan makes the sound case against royalty, only a part of which I’ve excerpted below:

The Royal Family is no better than a family of mobsters. It sucks its sustenance from the public coffers, enriching itself greatly at the expense of poor taxpaying citizens. It operates not as a meritocracy, but through strict nepotism and strategic alliances. And its strength is a rough measure of the lack of civilization in a particular culture. To be completely clear, we are not suggesting that people should “pay less attention” to the Royal Family, or that the UK should reduce the amount of money it spends on this obscene relic of a brutal monarchical past. We are suggesting that the Royal Family should, as an institution, be completely abolished, and that its remaining members be imprisoned and forced to work for the remainder of their lives to, in some token way, repay the public for all of these years of financial support. Perhaps by making license plates, or breaking rocks….

The Royal Family is more than an international embarrassment, though; it is a crime against the British public. It represents the taking of precious public resources for the most undemocratic, elitist, and unproductive use. It is akin to taxing the American public to support the Kardashian family…

Currently, the British monarchy gets 15% of the annual revenues generated by the Crown Estate. (Not to be confused with the slew of luxurious private estates that they own.) That will be well over $50 million this year. There are 2.5 million unemployed people in the UK right now. It is not too presumptuous to suggest that they might be able to find more productive uses for that money….

For the sake of all that is holy, please allow this Royal Baby to grow up free of the clutches of this crime family, lest its innocence be lost.

Via Imprison the Royal Family and Abolish the Monarchy.

Posted also @ Daily Adams.

Daily Bread for 7.22.13

Good morning.

Whitewater’s week begins with a mostly sunny day and a high of eighty-six, with a four-in-ten chance of thunderstorms this evening.

Downtown Whitewater’s Design Committee meets this morning at 8 AM.

On this day in 1991, Jeffrey Dahmer is caught in Milwaukee:

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, police officers spot Tracy Edwards running down the street in handcuffs, and upon investigation, they find one of the grisliest scenes in modern history-Jeffrey Dahmer’s apartment….

Apparently, police had been called two months earlier about a naked and bleeding 14-year-old boy being chased down an alley by Dahmer. The responding officers actually returned the boy, who had been drugged, to Dahmer’s apartment–where he was promptly killed. The officers, who said that they believed it to be a domestic dispute, were later fired.

A forensic examination of the apartment turned up 11 victims–the first of whom disappeared in March 1989, just two months before Dahmer successfully escaped a prison sentence for child molestation by telling the judge that he was desperately seeking to change his conduct. Dahmer later confessed to 17 murders in all, dating back to his first victim in 1978.

The jury rejected Dahmer’s insanity defense, and he was sentenced to 15 life terms. He survived one attempt on his life in July 1994, but was killed by another inmate on November 28, 1994.

On 7.22.1864, Wisconsinites participate in the Battle of Atlanta:

1864 – (Civil War) Battle of Atlanta, Georgia
The Atlanta Campaign had begun two months earlier, in May, but a decisive battle was fought on July 22. Union forces met 37,000 Confederate troops in a battle that some historians consider one of the most desperate and bloody of the war. Although 20 percent of Confederate forces were killed, wounded, or missing at the end of the day, the South still controlled the city. The 1st, 12th, 16th, 17th, 22nd, 25th, 26th, 31st Wisconsin Infantry regiments and the 5th Wisconsin Light Artillery were engaged in the Battle of Atlanta.

Puzzability’s new puzzle series (7.22 to 7.26) is called Sun Screens:

Sun Screens
If you can’t stand the heat, we’ve got just the ticket. For each day this week, we’ll give a three-by-three letter grid in which we’ve hidden the title of a movie that’s set during the summer. Each has 10 or more letters and any number of words. To find the title, start at any letter and move from letter to letter by traveling to any adjacent letter—across, up and down, or diagonally. You may come back to a letter you’ve used previously, but may not stay in the same spot twice in a row. You will not always need all nine letters in the grid.

Example:
F S U
O M A
R E M

Answer:
Summer of Sam

Here’s Monday’s puzzle:

Y G A
T D N
R I C