FREE WHITEWATER

Monthly Archives: December 2012

Daily Bread for 12.18.12

Good morning.

It’s a snowy day ahead for Whitewater, with only a slight accumulation expected, at a high of thirty.

Common Council meets tonight at 6:30 PM, where they will consider both an appointee to that body and a proposed backyard chicken ordinance.

On this day in 1957, the first civilian nuclear power plant went online:

Electricity has been produced before from atomic reactors, but never before in such quantity from a strictly civilian plant.

The Commission asserted in its announcement that the Shippingport plant is “the world’s first full-scale atomic electric power plant devoted exclusively to peacetime uses.”

Since October, 1956, the British atomic-power plant at Calder Hall has been generating up to 100,000 kilowatts of electricity, but this plant was designed to produce plutonium for weapons as well as electricity.

The Soviet Union has announced ambitious plans for atomic power but has disclosed only the operation of a 5,000-kilowatt plant.

From Wisconsin history on this day in 1950, here’s what might have been:

1950 – Lake Geneva Vies for Air Force Academy
On this date the city of Lake Geneva put forth efforts to be the future site for the U.S. Air Force Academy. A federal selection committee arrived to inspect the 100-room Stone Manor on Geneva Lake’s south shore and considered it as a possible headquarters building. The Air Force’s college for officers was eventually located in Colorado Springs, Colorado in 1958. [Source: Janesville Gazette]

Google-a-Day asks about MVPs: “Besides being honored as their respective leagues’ 1963 MVPs, what did Sandy Koufax and Elston Howard have in common?”

The New City Managers

Whitewater chose a new city manager earlier this year, and now Fort Atkinson has picked a new manager. Evelyn Johnson, the city administrator of Prairie City, Iowa, will replace John Wilmet. Wilmet has been city manager of nearby Fort since ’98.

Johnson and Whitewater’s new city manager, Cameron Clapper, have at least two things in common: they’re both relatively young, and each holds a Master of Public Administration (the conventional, terminal degree for those seeking a managerial career in municipal government).

(Two longtime readers from Fort, both shrewd watchers of that city, told me they thought that Johnson – aged twenty-seven — is likely to do well. They each told me she seemed smart and hardworking, and that the politics of that city would suit her.)

Johnson and Clapper likely have some common perspectives from age and education, but the nearby cities in which they’ll be working are far apart in political culture.

We are in a transition here, from one culture to another, but Fort Atkinson is experiencing no similar metamorphosis. Our neighboring city has evolved more conventionally, these last twenty years’ time, and the next ten will be — for Fort — less profound. Johnson will be swimming in mostly placid waters.

There’s a benefit to being young, without the ossifying influence of tenure (‘in my twenty-five years of municipal experience,’ ‘in thirty-three years, we’ve always done it this way,’ etc.) The long-tenured often flatter themselves with the notion that their years of uncreative, low-quality work are something other than years of uncreative, low-quality work.

Better not to have these empty conceits to blind oneself to reality.

Of Public Administration as an academic field, though, I have mixed feelings. Advanced learning is a general good, and should be encouraged. Accomplishments of this kind are real, offer valuable knowledge, and demonstrate hard work.

Although it’s an advantage to be well-schooled, from an MPA program there can be so much emphasis on managing public matters that one would think there were no private ones. At least, one would think there were no private projects that didn’t somehow depend on public interference, and use of private residents’ money, as though a limitless public resource.

It’s not merely that I’d prefer less spent, overall. It’s even more so that I am opposed to spending on already cash-flush businesses and special interests – interests that often get preferred access to MPA-holding officials who are taught to identify stakeholders, people of influence, and leading actors.

Who lives in a city? Residents, all equal.

Public policy should be – and is, when crafted properly – more than crony capitalism and grant-chasing.

One naturally hopes for the best for these leaders, of and for both cities.

Public Elves? Oh, Brother

The days of a quiet, humble ‘job well done’ are over.  One knows this, after seeing a public service video in which government workers praise themselves, and liken their own work to that of eleves.  Say what one might about the productivity of the government, at least it’s working overtime on the self-promoting-video front.

Published also at Daily Adams.

Daily Bread for 12.17.12

Good morning.

Our week begins with cloudy skies and a high of thirty five. We’ll have 9h 2m of sunlight and 10h 6m of daylight, with tomorrow being one minute shorter.

On this day in 1903, the first success of one of the greatest inventions of all history, reported later with marked understatement in the New York Times:

The inventors of the airship which is said to have made several successful flights in North Carolina, near Kitty Hawk, are anxious to sell the use of their device to the Government. They claim that they have solved the problem of aerial navigation, and have never made a failure of any attempt to fly.

Their machine is an adaptation of the box kite idea, with a propeller working on a perpendicular shaft to raise or lower the craft, and another working on a horizontal shaft to send it forward. The machine, it is said, can be raised or lowered with perfect control, and can carry a strong gasoline engine capable of making a speed of ten miles an hour.

The test made in North Carolina will be fully reported to the Ordnance Board of the War Department, and if the machine commends itself sufficiently, further tests will be made in the vicinity of Washington, and an effort made to arrange a sale of the device to the Government. The use to which the Government would put it would be in scouting and signal work, and possibly torpedo warfare.

From Google-a-Day, a question about American literature, and history: “What state holds a real life contest and celebration commemorating Mark Twain’s short story about the out-of-towner and the compulsive gambler?”

Recent Tweets, 12.9 to 12.15

Daily Bread for 12.16.12

Good morning.

It’s a a cloudy day for us, with a high of forty-two, today.

On 12.16.1773, the original tea party:

In Boston Harbor, a group of Massachusetts colonists disguised as Mohawk Indians board three British tea ships and dump 342 chests of tea into the harbor.

The midnight raid, popularly known as the “Boston Tea Party,” was in protest of the British Parliament’s Tea Act of 1773, a bill designed to save the faltering East India Company by greatly lowering its tea tax and granting it a virtual monopoly on the American tea trade. The low tax allowed the East India Company to undercut even tea smuggled into America by Dutch traders, and many colonists viewed the act as another example of taxation tyranny.

When three tea ships, the Dartmouth, the Eleanor, and the Beaver, arrived in Boston Harbor, the colonists demanded that the tea be returned to England. After Massachusetts Governor Thomas Hutchinson refused, Patriot leader Samuel Adams organized the “tea party” with about 60 members of the Sons of Liberty, his underground resistance group. The British tea dumped in Boston Harbor on the night of December 16 was valued at some $18,000.

Parliament, outraged by the blatant destruction of British property, enacted the Coercive Acts, also known as the Intolerable Acts, in 1774. The Coercive Acts closed Boston to merchant shipping, established formal British military rule in Massachusetts, made British officials immune to criminal prosecution in America, and required colonists to quarter British troops. The colonists subsequently called the first Continental Congress to consider a united American resistance to the British.

Google-a-Day has a science question: “What is the name of the famous Scot, born in 1997, who was an identical twin to her mother, born six years earlier?”

 

 

Daily Bread for 12.15.12

Good morning.

We’ve a rainy Saturday ahead, with a high of forty-four, and rainfall in an amount between a quarter and half of an inch.

On this day in 1791, a triumph of American liberty:

Virginia becomes the last state to ratify the Bill of Rights, making the first ten amendments to the Constitution law and completing the revolutionary reforms begun by the Declaration of Independence. Before theMassachusetts ratifying convention would accept the Constitution, which they finally did in February 1788, the document’s Federalist supporters had to promise to create a Bill of Rights to be amended to the Constitution immediately upon the creation of a new government under the document.

The Anti-Federalist critics of the document, who were afraid that a too-strong federal government would become just another sort of the monarchical regime from which they had recently been freed, believed that the Constitution gave too much power to the federal government by outlining its rights but failing to delineate the rights of the individuals living under it. The promise of a Bill of Rights to do just that helped to assuage the Anti-Federalists’ concerns.

The newly elected Congress drafted the Bill of Rights on December 25, 1789. Virginia’s ratification on this day in 1791 created the three-fourths majority necessary for the ten amendments to become law…

The Washington Post showcases the recent Geminid meteor shower with a slideshow at the paper’s website.  They’ve some fine photos on display.

In 1847, our state’s second constitutional convention began:

1847 – Wisconsin’s Second Constitutional Convention Convenes in Madison
On this date the first draft of the Wisconsin Constitution was rejected in 1846. As a result, Wisconsin representatives met again to draft a new constitution in 1847. New delegates were invited, and only five delegates attended both conventions. The second convention used the failed 1846 constitution as a springboard for their own, but left out controversial issues such as banking and property rights for women that the first constitution attempted to address. The second constitution included a proposal to let the people of Wisconsin vote on a referendum designed to approve black suffrage. [Source: Attainment of Statehood by Milo M. Quaife]

Google’s daily puzzle asks about geography and military history: “How many main islands comprise the only British territory that was occupied by Germany during WWII?”

Friday Poll: Packers v. Bears

Noon, 12.16.12, at Solider Field: a no-longer-cordial rivalry. (It’s never been cordial between the teams’ fans.)

Packers are about a field-goal favorite, and that seems mostly right to me, but a one-possession game still would be susceptible readily of twists and turns altering the outcome.

I’ll say Packers by 1, 21-20.

What do you think?


Daily Bread for 12.14.12

Good morning.

Our work week in Whitewater ends with sunny skies, a high of 44, and winds from the southeast at 5 to 10 mph. Very pleasant.

On this day in 2003, the U.S. military captured Saddam Hussein, who had been in hiding since the fall of his regime.

In Wisconsin history from 12.14.64,

1964 – Parker Pen Traded on NY Stock Exchange
On this date, for the first time, shares of Janesville’s Parker Pen Co. were traded on the New York Stock Exchange. For its first 40 years, the company was a closed corporation. In 1928, Parker stock was offered on the Chicago Stock Exchange, which became the Midwest Stock Exchange in 1949. [Source:Janesville Gazette, December 14, 1964, p.1 ]

Parker and many other companies have since left Janesville.

Google-a-Day asks a since question: “What did the great-granddaughter of John “Crazy” Fitch invent as a way of reducing damage done by servants?”

A Model Ordinance

These last few months, beginning in September, Whitewater’s Planning Commission has heard, and subsequently considered, a proposal for an urban (backyard) chicken ordinance. The proposal is not mine; I have been a mere observer of this effort. One may write about a topic, but only after months of careful observation, as in this case.

I have watched this discussion with interest, these months since September.

Some time ago, I’d written in support (i, ii, iii) of hens as urban chickens, but there’s nothing of my effort in the months of careful work and preparation for Whitewater’s present proposal; the credit for that hard work lies only elsewhere.

There are many reasons to support this proposal, as an expression of sustainability, organic and healthful living, property rights, our agricultural heritage, and our sophisticated, upscale future. Urban chickens offer all these advantages for our community.

That’s not all, however, behind months of work: this proposal rests on a model ordinance, that Whitewater’s residents, Neighborhood Services Director, and Planning Commissioners have used as a starting point for considerable hours of work and review. That’s not just an effort, but an effort with the right beginning.

From an initial mention of a proposed ordinance on 9.10.12 (video from start to 4:03), to additional materials and discussion on 10.8.12 (video from 25:30 to 2:00:00), to a working session to consider a model ordinance based on best practices elsewhere on 11.12.12 (video from 34:45 to 1:35:22), to a unanimous recommendation to Council at the 12.10.12 Planning Commission meeting.

It’s an understatement to say that this was solid, capable, patient work. It’s not merely solid or capable and patient work for our city – but that it would be for any city.

That standard is, in the end, exactly the standard Whitewater deserves – the equal of the best practices of any other community.

This is a proposal easily worthy of Common Council’s full support.

It’s Not Who, But What

Our Common Council has before it, at the next scheduled meeting of 12.18.12, applications to fill a vacancy on that body. Four residents have applied; the appointment will run until April.

Council will appoint as they see fit; they have broad discretion for an appointment like this.

They and we, however, would do well by seeing that these applicants are more than a name, address, and occupation. They deserve consideration for their judgment and understanding.

It’s not superficially who a person is, but what he or she believes of government and representation, that matters most. Whether for a season, a month, or even a day, our politics are meant to be more than a trite question at a social climber’s gathering: ‘what’s your name, and what do you do?’

We can, and should, do better than that.