FREE WHITEWATER

Recents Tweets, 3.18 to 3.24

Mar 23
@DailyAdams
The Koch Brothers’ Political Avarice | Daily Adams http://bit.ly/GT9wtp #koch #libertarian
Retweeted by FREEWHITEWATER

22 Mar
@DailyAdams
Suddenly not free-market at all: The Right and Immigration | Daily Adams http://bit.ly/GNOvVI #immigration
Retweeted by FREEWHITEWATER

22 Mar
@DailyAdams
Libertarians who support immigration restrictions simply aren’t libertarian; they’re conservatives http://bit.ly/GQPbqn
Retweeted by FREEWHITEWATER

22 Mar
Best local-government marketing is good policy & good law Nothing government does will or could matter more

22 Mar
Conservative blogger threatens liberals with libel over worthless kerfuffle http://bit.ly/GHvnZO

21 Mar
MacIver poster beclowns himself: No one of any seriousness presents a *legal demand* via Twitter http://bit.ly/GE6KvZ

21 Mar
MacIver Institute: Delicate Little Flower or School Yard Bully? Edgy reaction via tweets(!) shows insecurity http://bit.ly/GKP67N

20 Mar
Candidate’s a cushy job all its own – Santorum: Unemployment Rate “Doesn’t Matter To Me” – http://bit.ly/GBSgOv

Republican Betting on Walker’s Recall Opponent

The Republican Governors Association expects Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett to be a candidate in the recall race against Gov. Walker (Barrett’s promised to announce his intentions between 3.30 and 4.3). Most people expect him to be a candidate. (I’d guess that, should he run, he’d beat candidates Kathleen Falk and Kathleen Vinehout in recall primary).

One can tell what the RGA thinks because they’ve unleashed a thirty-second anti-Barrett and anti-Falk ad. The ad, though, emphasizes Barrett.

In that emphasis, I’d say the GOP is right – Barrett will run, and he will win the Democratic nomination in a May 8th primary.

Here’s the ad:

Posted originally on 3.23.12 at Daily Adams. more >>

The Right and Immigration

Steve Chapman, writing in a reposted 2007 article at Reason, explains Why the Right Shifted on Immigration.

Chapman thinks the shift began with the fall of the Berlin Wall, when many conservatives no longer saw immigrants trying to reach our shores as proof of America’s sound economy and society.

If so, consider the cynicism of the Right: they didn’t support individual liberty for its own sake, but as a talking point in an ideological battle with the Soviet Union.

Broad-based free markets in capital, labor, and goods are superior in efficiency and morality to their alternatives. They didn’t become less so because the Cold War ended.

Then or now, a free flow of labor benefits America. Conservatives will have none of it today.

Libertarians might, of course, decide that a battle with the Left requires support for conservative candidates who back immigration restrictions, however Draconian. Those libertarians may choose as they wish, but they would do the liberty-movement a courtesy if they were to call themselves by another name.

Conservative, I think, would fit nicely.

The rest of us will do better to stay as we are, advocating for individual liberty, limited government, free markets in capital, labor, and goods, and peace abroad.

Posted originally on 3.22.12 at Daily Adams.

Note about Whitewater: It’s unlikely that legislation as bad as AB 173 will ever become Wisconsin law. Enactment of those provisions over this community, or any community, would justify a diligent and zealous campaign by every legal means, at whatever cost or difficulty it would bring (“One should be prepared to seek legal redress against each and every exercise of a wrongful law in one’s community. Time for this effort, and the cost of that time, however much may be needed, should be offered without charge or expectation.”)

Argue Against Obama Seriously or Not at All

Libertarians harm themselves when they criticize Pres. Obama in the simpleminded way that the Right does.

The Kochs may be sure that more and more money into Americans for Prosperity will defeat Pres. Obama, but we have reason to doubt that it will work (the GOP candidates will have choppy sailing), and those GOP candidates offer libertarians little or nothing.

If we are to argue against Pres. Obama’s vast expansion of government , we would do well not to sound like the Republicans he now leads in national polls. It’s a conservative, Don Surber, who makes this point plainly when he writes that it’s foolish to attack Pres. Obama as a radical:

This is birtherism again. This is a loser issue. Even if you prove your point that beyond a shadow of a doubt that Barack Obama is a communist Muslim who is ineligible to be president, so what? He has been president for 3+ years. The question this year is not “is Obama a communist Muslim who is ineligible to be president” but rather “is Obama doing a good job — even if Obama were a communist Muslim who is ineligible to be president?”

Now I know that Obama’s a Democrat, Christian, and conventionally liberal, but Surber’s not speaking to libertarians, he’s speaking to the Right.

If Republicans want to take any position, they’re free to do so.

Not any position, however, is a winning one, nor is any position compatible with a healthy libertarian movement (whatever happens in November).

Posted originally on 3.19.12 at Daily Adams.

Daily Bread for 3.22.12

Good morning.

It’s a Thursday of showers, and a high of seventy-seven, ahead for the Whippet City.

Forty years ago today, Congress sent a proposed Equal Rights Amendment to the Constitution to the states for ratification. It fell short of the three-fourths approval needed. In any event, America shouldn’t need an amendment to recognize rights equally true for men and women.

Oh happy day — it’s the birthday of Eugene Shephard, father of the hodag. The Wisconsin Historical Society has the details of Shepherd’s discovery invention:

On this date Eugene Shepard was born near Green Bay. Although he made his career in the lumbering business near Rhinelander, he was best known for his story-telling and practical jokes. He told many tales of Paul Bunyan, the mythical lumberjack, and drew pictures of the giant at work that became famous. Shepard also started a new legend about a prehistoric monster that roamed the woods of Wisconsin – the hodag. Shepard built the mythical monster out of wood and bull’s horns. He fooled everyone into believing it was alive, allowing it to be viewed only inside a dark tent. The beast was displayed at the Wausau and Antigo county fairs before Shepard admitted it was all a hoax. [Source: Badger Saints and Sinners, by Fred L. Holmes, p.459-474]


The hodag’s become the mascot for Rhinelander, Wisconsin,  and  a music festival, the Hodag County Festival, that carries the animal’s name (35th annual festival to be held this July 12-15).

Hard to top a post about the hodag, but Google’s daily puzzle, about an early Congressional mistake, still fascinates: “Due to an oversight in Congress, the state that joined the Union in 1803 didn’t officially become a state until what year?”

Whitewater’s 3.20.12 Common Council Meeting

Sometimes the most telling discussion within a meeting occurs early, in remarks offered nearly offhand.

That was true with last night’s Common Council meeting, in remarks from her city manager, Kevin Brunner. Two of his topics deserve mention.

On the Innovation Center, the city manager distributed a glossy one-year anniversary book, and a glossy tri-fold brochure describing the Center. It’s such an old, tired approach that I’m not sure it’s serious.

There’s a place for marketing, but will anyone worth having choose the Center, or even learn about it this way? I’m not convinced. If the purpose of these glossy docs should be to use on a job interview (‘look what I helped build!’), then it makes some sense to me. That’s not a good reason to spend money, but at least it might work for an applicant looking for other pastures.

If the goal should be to sell the Center to the kinds of tenants who would be suited to its original purpose, I’d guess an all-electronic presentation would be better.

Greener, too.

A second topic came up early, too. There’s the chance that a local business, Generac, will win public approval for a bus line between the Janesville area and Whitewater. This is all very preliminary, but as the city manager mentioned it, I’ll respond.

Buses to shuttle a private businesses’s workers from Whitewater to other cities should be that business’s private investment. Schemes to begin with private money, but then add public costs borne by all taxpayers, are unfair.

The residents of Whitewater, Janesville, or anywhere else do not owe Generac a bus line, or even part of a bus line. If they’ve hired many, for the considerable work they must be doing, the transportation for those workers should be Generac’s business concern, not Whitewater’s municipal one.

It’s also backwards thinking – if I understand the city manager’s description correctly – to begin with private money and then transition to public money. A drop of private fuel for a spark should not lead to a gas tank of public money.

I wouldn’t be inclined to this plan generally, but if it had any merit, it would start with a small amount of public money and then transition to private funds.

Better still: private Generac uses its own revenues for its own employees, as employer and employees mutually decide, without reliance on Whitewater’s general public.

Plans involving brochures and buses aren’t new ideas as much as confirmation about how misguided policy in this small city has been.