FREE WHITEWATER

Author Archive for JOHN ADAMS

Who Said It Better: Falwell or Christ?

 

A poor person never gave anyone a job. A poor person never gave anybody charity, not of any real volume. It’s just common sense to me.

—  Jerry Falwell Jr. can’t imagine Trump ‘doing anything that’s not good for the country’.

 

41 He sat down opposite the treasury and observed how the crowd put money into the treasury. Many rich people put in large sums.

42 A poor widow also came and put in two small coins worth a few cents.

43 Calling his disciples to himself, he said to them, “Amen, I say to you, this poor widow put in more than all the other contributors to the treasury.

44 For they have all contributed from their surplus wealth, but she, from her poverty, has contributed all she had, her whole livelihood.”

—  Mark, 12:41-44.

 

Falwell, a self-professed evangelical, here speaks in direct opposition to plain Christian teaching. (Indeed, his full interview with the Washington Post reveals error after error, as though Falwell had never seen, let alone read, a New Testament. No doubt he has read one; it’s simply that what he’s saying now is not found in the faith he professes.)

Falwell and his ilk are mistaken if they think those of us who are religious – or candidly anyone who can read a text – will yield to his contrivances. 

The Broad Outlines of 2019

For many years, I would begin the year with predictions for the twelve months ahead.  Events since 2016 have made predictions harder,  but one can still discern some short-term developments for the city.  These prospects, of course, form an online of topics to ponder, and about which to write (often requiring that one return to the same topic many times as needed throughout the year).  A few general issues for Whitewater appear below, listed alphabetically.

 Assault Awareness and Prevention.  The campus wants healing, and the city needs enlightenment, but both will come only through a process of truth and reconciliation. Whitewater has slipped closer to Missoula or Steubenville than any town should. Those communities do not have reputation problems — they have had, so to speak, individual injury problems. The latter led to the former.

 Community.  There are green shoots in this city even in hard times.  They’re not to be found at the Whitewater CDA, or city government, but in local organizing efforts (for food, clothing, necessities).  These are worthy efforts that will make a difference in residents’ lives. For all the hard problems to address, these are the soft (yet durable) solutions to applaud.

Economy, Local. Whitewater has a weak local economy. See Two Truths of Whitewater’s Economy.

Indeed, she’s gone in the wrong direction (from Wisconsin and America) these last ten years. See Reported Family Poverty in Whitewater Increased Over the Last Decade.

 Economy, National.  Recession or not, growth will decline enough so that it will feel like a recession for many.  See Low Growth as Decline.

 Evers. He has a tall order before him, but I think he’ll grow on more and more Wisconsinites.

 Print Publications.  Putting the expression ‘circling the drain’ to good use.

  Schools. The most important work isn’t a referendum; it’s everything afterward.

  Town-Gown. Accreditation, coffee, dogs, and shopping (however attractive in the moment) won’t be enough to bridge the gap between campus and the community beyond.

 Trumpism.  There is no greater threat to an American community than a bigoted, self-dealing authoritarianism that holds federal executive power in its grip.

WEDC, CDA, CIA, FBI, whatever… If there’s ever been a risible failure for Whitewater, it’s the state-capitalist and crony-capitalist approach of the WEDC, and the use of the Whitewater Community Development Authority as a tiny WEDC. Local notables and their out-of-touch appointee playing venture capitalist with public money isn’t venture capitalism, or any kind of productive free-market approach. It’s a vanity project that short-changes the community.  Pride makes for poor policy.

For all these that one can see, there will be other issues that emerge over the year.

Daily Bread for 1.2.19

Good morning.

Wednesday in Whitewater will see cloudy skies and a high of twenty-nine.  Sunrise is 7:25 AM and sunset 4:32 PM, for 9h 07m 26s of daytime.  The moon is a waning crescent with 11% of its visible disk illuminated.

On this day in 1918, Wisconsin troops depart for Europe:

the Wisconsin 127th and 128th Infantries departed for France from their training facility at Camp Arthur in Waco, Texas. Initially, these divisions were assigned to construct depots and facilities for troops that would follow. On May 18, they were assigned to the frontline at Belmont in the Alsace where they faced three German divisions. In the following months, 368 troops were killed, wounded or missing. Ironically, their enemy, native Alsatians, spoke German and the Wisconsin troops were better able to communicate with them than their French allies.

Recommended for reading in full:

  Patrick Marley reports Scott Walker to join speaker’s bureau, emphasize tax cuts and help re-elect Donald Trump:

Departing Gov. Scott Walker told supporters Tuesday he would be giving speeches, emphasizing tax cuts and working to re-elect President Donald Trump after Walker leaves office next week.

(Putting that charisma and dynamic speaking style to good use already…)

 Brad Reed reports Trump-loving economist [Stephen Moore] caught red-handed ‘making up numbers’ by CNN guest [Catherine Rampell]:

“Both of the rate hikes were unnecessary and were a cause for deflation in the economy,” he [Moore] said.

“Wait, wait, wait!” interjected Rampell. “There is no deflation!”

“Yeah there is,” Moore replied.

“No there is not,” she shot back. “Look at the Consumer Price Index!”

Moore tried to counter by noting that some prices on the Commodities Price Index had dropped — but Rampell hit back by saying that much of that was due to President Donald Trump’s trade wars.

“Soy bean prices are falling because of the trade war,” she said.

Rampell then nailed Moore for his false warnings during the Obama presidency that it was unwise for the Fed to keep interest rates low because it would lead to hyperinflation — despite the fact that the economy at the time was deeply depressed and much more in need of easy money.

Catherine Rampell writes elsewhere A recession is coming. Trump will make it so much worse:

Statistically speaking, given how long the economy has been growing, a recession is overdue — and the eventual collapse may bear Trump’s fingerprints. After all, his new trade barriers have lifted manufacturing costs, closed off markets and clouded the future for American firms with global supply chains. Economists say Trump’s trade war is the biggest threat to the U.S. economy in 2019. In loonier moments, the president has also threatened to default on our debt, ramp up the money-printing press, reinstate the gold standard or deport all 11 million undocumented immigrants. Some of those policies would ignite not just a recession but an immediate, global financial crisis.

How This Dummy-Car Tests Collision Detection Systems In Your Car:

Daily Bread for 1.1.19

Good morning.

Tuesday begins a new year in Whitewater with cloudy skies and a high of twenty-five.  Sunrise is 7:25 AM and sunset 4:32 PM, for 9h 06m 34s of daytime.  The moon is a waning crescent with 18.4% of its visible disk illuminated.

On this day in 1863, the Emancipation Proclamation takes effect.

 

Recommended for reading in full:

  Patrick Marley reports Speaker Robin Vos won’t release $850,000 contract with law firm in Wisconsin gerrymandering case:

MADISON – Assembly Speaker Robin Vos won’t make public a legal contract that will cost taxpayers $850,000, despite a state law meant to ensure government records are widely available.

Advocates for open records say the Rochester Republican is in the wrong and must release a copy of the contract with the Chicago-based law firm Bartlit Beck.

Assembly Republicans recently retained the firm to help defend the state in a long-running lawsuit over legislative district lines they drew in 2011 that have helped them win elections. Taxpayers have already spent more than $2 million in legal fees to draw and defend those maps.

“They should just release the record. I mean, it’s clearly a public record and it should be automatic,” said Orville Seymer, field operations director of the conservative Citizens for Responsible Government and a member of the Wisconsin Freedom of Information Council’s board.

“I think the denial of this contract is clearly illegal and clearly in bad faith,” said Bill Lueders, editor of The Progressive magazine and president of the Wisconsin Freedom of Information Council.

Later in the story, Marley quotes Rick Esenberg, president of the conservative Wisconsin Institute of Law & Liberty,  as saying “They have got a lot of law on their side,” Esenberg said of the stance Vos’ team has taken.”  Oh, brother – they only have ‘a lot of law’ on their side if one assumes that an entire contract with a public body, itself, constitutes an attorney-client writing.  It most certainly does not, as Esenberg surely knows.

April Barker, a Brookfield attorney and a vice president of the Wisconsin Freedom of Information Council, said it is unusual for legal contracts to include information that is subject to attorney-client privilege. Lawyers are careful in how they write them because they know that such contracts must sometimes be released as part of litigation, she said.

If the contract does include any privileged information, Vos should black out those portions of the contract and release the remainder of it, she said.

“I can’t see any legitimate basis for withholding the entire document,” she said.

Jennifer Rubin observes Trump’s agenda is dependent on provable falsehoods:

Trump’s lies are not inconsequential. They are a necessary foundation for his political survival (in an investigation that has indicted more than 30 people, he still screams “Witch hunt!”) and for an agenda that is based on ignorance and deception. And because of the centrality of lying to his survival and agenda, Republicans who continue to support him increasingly must live alongside him in his alternative universe.

The Adrenaline Rush of Herding Reindeer in the North Pole:

Daily Bread for 12.31.18

Good morning.

Monday in Whitewater will be cloudy with a high of thirty-six.  Sunrise is 7:25 AM and sunset 4:31 PM, for 9h 05m 45s of daytime.  The moon is a waning crescent with 27.2% of its visible disk illuminated.

On this day in 1879, Thomas Edison conducts a public demonstration of his incandescent bulb:

Other people had been working on the making of light bulbs in the past, but none of the earlier bulbs was ever able to work for more than a few minutes. Finally, on October 21, 1879, Edison’s light bulb burned for a continuous thirteen and a half hours. The following bulbs lasted for 40 hours and Edison and his team worked hard to light the laboratory and his home with several of the new light bulbs for Christmas. On New Year’s Eve of the same year, Christie Street became the world’s first street to be lit by incandescent light bulbs with the help of a power system designed by Edison. By the summer of 1880, Edison had perfected the incandescent bulb enough to be able to produce and sell it in large quantities.

Recommended for reading in full:

  Alexandra Alter reports New Life for Old Classics, as Their Copyrights Run Out:

This coming year marks the first time in two decades that a large body of copyrighted works will lose their protected status — a shift that will have profound consequences for publishers and literary estates, which stand to lose both money and creative control.

But it will also be a boon for readers, who will have more editions to choose from, and for writers and other artists who can create new works based on classic stories without getting hit with an intellectual property lawsuit.

“Books are going to be available in a much wider variety now, and they’re going to be cheaper,” said Imke Reimers, an assistant professor of economics at Northeastern University who has studied the impact of copyright. “Consumers and readers are definitely going to benefit from this.”

The sudden deluge of available works traces back to legislation Congress passed in 1998, which extended copyright protections by 20 years. The law reset the copyright term for works published from 1923 to 1977 — lengthening it from 75 years to 95 years after publication — essentially freezing their protected status. (The law is often referred to by skeptics as the “Mickey Mouse Protection Act,” since it has kept “Steamboat Willie,” the first Disney film featuring Mickey, under copyright until 2024.)

Now that the term extension has run out, the spigot has been turned back on. Each January will bring a fresh crop of novels, plays, music and movies into the public domain. Over the next few years, the impact will be particularly dramatic, in part because the 1920s were such a fertile and experimental period for Western literature, with the rise of masters like F. Scott Fitzgerald, William Faulkner, Ernest Hemingway and Virginia Woolf.

This Abandoned Nuclear City is Trapped Under Ice, What Happens if it Thaws?

Daily Bread for 12.30.18

Good morning.

Sunday in Whitewater will be mostly sunny with a high of thirty-six.  Sunrise is 7:25 AM and sunset 4:30 PM, for 9h 05m 01s of daytime.  The moon is a waning crescent with 37.1% of its visible disk illuminated.

On this day in 1922, authorities in Madison confiscate illegal alcohol: “1,200 gallons of “mash” and fifteen gallons of moonshine from the home of a suspected bootlegger.”

Recommended for reading in full:

  Linda Qui writes Deciphering the Patterns in Trump’s Falsehoods:

Fact checkers have compiled lists of all of Mr. Trump’s falsehoods since he took office (The Washington Post counts over 7,500, and The Toronto Star over 3,900), rounded up his most egregious whoppers in year-end lists and scrutinized his claims in real time with television chyrons.

Mr. Trump refuses to correct most of his inaccurate claims, instead asserting them over and over again. They become, by sheer force of repetition, “alternative facts” and staples of his campaign rallies and speeches.

Examples abound. He has falsely characterized the December 2017 tax cuts as the “largest” or the “biggest” in American history over 100 times (several others were larger). He has misleadingly said over 90 times that his promised wall along the southern border is being built (construction has not begun on any new section). He has falsely accused Democrats of supporting “open borders” over 60 times (Democratic lawmakers support border security, but not his border wall). And he has lobbed over 250 inaccurate attacks on the investigation into Russian election interference.

….

In the face of controversy or criticism, Mr. Trump has defended initial falsehoods with additional dubious claims.

This approach is evident in his shifting statements about the payment that Michael D. Cohen, his former lawyer, made to a pornographic film actress to keep her from speaking about their alleged affair. In April, Mr. Trump falsely denied knowing about the payment.

After the F.B.I. raided Mr. Cohen’s office, Mr. Trump acknowledged on Twitter in May that Mr. Cohen received reimbursement for the payment and asserted that it had nothing to do with his presidential campaign. Mr. Cohen would later tell prosecutors that he acted at Mr. Trump’s direction and to influence the election.

….

Mr. Trump also regales his audience with elaborate stories. Some — like his tales of unnamed “strong” or “tough” men, miners or steelworkers crying and thanking him — may have occurred but are impossible to verify.

….

The usual target of this particular strain of falsehoods is the news media, which Mr. Trump suggests purposely underestimates or misinterprets him.

Mr. Trump often lauds strong job growth under his watch and says that the “fake news” would have deemed such numbers “impossible” or “ridiculous” during the 2016 campaign. Yet he neglects to mention that the number of jobs added in the 22 months after his inauguration — 4.2 million — is lower than the 4.8 million jobs added in the 22 months before he took office, undermining the premise of his retrodiction.

The Underwater Indiana Jones Preserving Our Past:

Daily Bread for 12.29.18

Good morning.

Saturday in Whitewater will be mostly cloudy with a high of twenty-nine.  Sunrise is 7:25 AM and sunset 4:29 PM, for 9h 04m 21s of daytime.  The moon is a waning crescent with 47.7% of its visible disk illuminated.

On this day in 1879, General William “Billy” Mitchell is born.

Recommended for reading in full:

  Patrick Radden Keefe explains How Mark Burnett Resurrected Donald Trump as an Icon of American Success (“With “The Apprentice,” the TV producer mythologized Trump—then a floundering D-lister—as the ultimate titan, paving his way to the Presidency”):

In 2002, Burnett rented Wollman Rink, in Central Park, for a live broadcast of the Season 4 finale of “Survivor.” The property was controlled by Donald Trump, who had obtained the lease to operate the rink in 1986, and had plastered his name on it. Before the segment started, Burnett addressed fifteen hundred spectators who had been corralled for the occasion, and noticed Trump sitting with Melania Knauss, then his girlfriend, in the front row. Burnett prides himself on his ability to “read the room”: to size up the personalities in his audience, suss out what they want, and then give it to them.

“I need to show respect to Mr. Trump,” Burnett recounted, in a 2013 speech in Vancouver. “I said, ‘Welcome, everybody, to Trump Wollman skating rink. The Trump Wollman skating rink is a fine facility, built by Mr. Donald Trump. Thank you, Mr. Trump. Because the Trump Wollman skating rink is the place we are tonight and we love being at the Trump Wollman skating rink, Mr. Trump, Trump, Trump, Trump, Trump.” As Burnett told the story, he had scarcely got offstage before Trump was shaking his hand, proclaiming, “You’re a genius!”

  Max Fisher reports Inside Facebook’s Secret Rulebook for Global Political Speech (“Under fire for stirring up distrust and violence, the social network has vowed to police its users. But leaked documents raise serious questions about its approach”):

Every other Tuesday morning, several dozen Facebook employees gather over breakfast to come up with the rules, hashing out what the site’s two billion users should be allowed to say. The guidelines that emerge from these meetings are sent out to 7,500-plus moderators around the world. (After publication of this article, Facebook said it had increased that number to around 15,000.)

The closely held rules are extensive, and they make the company a far more powerful arbiter of global speech than has been publicly recognized or acknowledged by the company itself, The New York Times has found.

The Times was provided with more than 1,400 pages from the rulebooks by an employee who said he feared that the company was exercising too much power, with too little oversight — and making too many mistakes.

An examination of the files revealed numerous gaps, biases and outright errors. As Facebook employees grope for the right answers, they have allowed extremist language to flourish in some countries while censoring mainstream speech in others.

 Watch an Underwater Battle in ‘Aquaman’:

Elizabeth Bruenig Writes of Amber Wyatt

In September, Elizabeth Bruenig wrote about Amber Wyatt, a classmate she barely knew in 2006 when both attended a high school in Arlington, Texas. Wyatt was raped that year, and when she reported the crime, she found, in Bruenig’s words, that ‘few believed her. Her hometown turned against her. The authorities failed her.’

I first learned about Amber Wyatt when someone far from the city recommended Bruenig’s essay. (Since September, Bruenig – a columnist at the Washington Post – has written later stories about Wyatt and the response to the original essay; she has also written about sexual assault in religious institutions.)

There is nothing easy about Amber Wyatt’s story, as there could be nothing easy in any such story, no matter how artfully told (and Elizabeth Bruenig’s essay is a melancholy but artful account).

Here in our beautiful but troubled city, we have over these last several years seen repeated injustices like Wyatt’s. So many, in fact, that someone who has no specialized insight – and would never claim any – felt the need to create a category on the subject while writing about life in this small city.

I would recommend Bruenig’s account of Amber Wyatt’s assault (and experiences since), with the necessary caution that any account of the kind will prove painfully unsettling.

And yet, and yet — any account of these injuries, whether near or far, would be by its very nature painfully unsettling.

Film: Monday, December 31st, 12:30 PM @ Seniors in the Park, Mamma Mia! Here We Go Again

This Monday, December 31st at 12:30 PM, there will be a showing of Mamma Mia! Here We Go Again @ Seniors in the Park, in the Starin community building:

Mamma Mia! Here We Go Again (Comedy/Musical/Romance)

Monday, December 31, 12:30 pm.
Rated PG-13. 1 hour, 54 min. (2018)

It’s five years later, and daughter Sophie (Amanda Seyfried) is preparing for the Grand Re-Opening of the Hotel Bella Donna. About to have a child of her own, Sophie begins to worry that her life will repeat her mom’s (Meryl Streep) and that she’ll have to raise her child alone. She enlists the help of mom’s old friends (Christine Baranski, Julie Walters), as well as her three “dads” (Pierce Brosnan, Colin Firth, Stellan Skarsgard), to learn more about her mother’s story…told in flashback! Along for the ride is Sophie’s estranged grandmother —- played by Cher. We will be showing the Sing-along version, ABBA fans!

One can find more information about Mamma Mia! Here We Go Again at the Internet Movie Database.

Enjoy.

Daily Bread for 12.28.18

Good morning.

Friday in Whitewater will see rain, changing to snow, with a high of thirty-nine.  Sunrise is 7:24 AM and sunset 4:28 PM, for 9h 03m 47s of daytime.  The moon is a waning gibbous with 58.8% of its visible disk illuminated.

On this day in 1895, Auguste and Louis Lumière publicly screen 10 short films, including their first film, Sortie des Usines Lumière à Lyon (Workers Leaving the Lumière Factory).

Recommended for reading in full:

  Annie Karni reports Trump Iraq Visit Is Called a Political Rally:

During his surprise visit to American troops in Iraq and Germany this week, President Trump singled out red “Make America Great Again” caps in a sea of military fatigues, signed a “Trump 2020” patch and accused Representative Nancy Pelosi and other leading Democrats of being weak on border security.

Now the president is facing accusations that he was playing politics with the military.

“When that starts happening, it’s like the politicalization of the judicial branch,” said Mark Hertling, a retired three-star Army lieutenant general.

Visiting troops abroad is a presidential tradition in which the commander in chief puts aside politics to thank a military that represents a broad spectrum of the country. But Mr. Trump’s political comments and his encouragement of supporters in the crowd veered from those norms.

“He has to understand that there exist some audiences that should not be addressed as part of his base, because they are not,” Mr. Hertling said. “It’s a violation of protocol by the president.”

Anne Applebaum asks Has the GOP retreated into a world of make-believe? The shutdown debate will tell us:

The hard truth is that the wall has no function. Its only purpose is to serve as a talisman, as a fairy tale, as a mythical, “beautiful” piece of concrete that will be paid for by Mexico. The only difference between the wall and the now-forgotten, equally mythical “caravan” that we discussed during the election is that construction will cost real money. We, not Mexico, will pay for it in taxes and, therefore, in lost productivity. Or we will pay for it in interest on the national debt. Or we will pay for it by sacrificing spending on fighter jets or health care or roads.

It will make our nation weaker and poorer — $5 billion poorer. That’s why this isn’t a debate about border policy. It’s a debate that tells us which of our politicians cares about the real world inhabited by real Americans and which prefer to live in a fantasy world created by the president’s imagination. For the future of the country, it’s important that reality wins.

David J. Lynch reports Economic growth is slowing all around the world:

For the past month, economic data in the United States, Japan and the euro zone consistently has failed to meet analysts’ expectations, according to a Citigroup Global Markets index of economic surprises. Chinese results also began disappointing on Dec. 10 amid signs that the economy is slowing more sharply than policymakers had anticipated.

 A bit about Ben Franklin and the U.S. Postal Service:

Trump’s Attorney General Nominee Wrong on Obstruction of Justice

Daniel J. Hemel and Eric A. Posner conclude Yes, [Trump Attorney General Nominee] Bill Barr’s Memo Really is Wrong About Obstruction of Justice. They respond with 6 arguments concerning federal bribery law,  “facially lawful” acts,  obstruction and collusion, the Starr investigation, the theory of a unitary executive, and the context of appointee Barr’s memo.  I’ve excerpted parts of Hemel and Posner’s first argument, but each argument is equally sound.

In a New York Times op-ed last Friday, we wrote that William Barr, who served as attorney general under President George H.W. Bush and has been nominated by President Trump for that post again, had seriously damaged his credibility by sending an unsolicited and poorly reasoned memo to the Justice Department and the White House arguing that Special Counsel Robert Mueller “should not be permitted to demand that the President submit to interrogation about alleged obstruction.” At the National Review, Andrew McCarthy says that our op-ed is “surprisingly vapid” and that the Barr memorandum’s legal advice is “sound.” We explain below why McCarthy’s arguments are mistaken.

The Bribery Debate

Barr argues that “statutes that do not expressly apply to the President must be construed as not applying to the President if such application would involve a possible conflict with the President’s constitutional prerogatives.” Barr’s claim, we said, was too broad because it would shield the president from “a host of uncontroversial laws” such as the federal bribery statute. After all, the president has the constitutional prerogative to nominate (and with the advice and consent of the Senate, appoint) members of his own Cabinet, but no one thinks that the president can therefore sell off Cabinet posts to the highest bidders.

McCarthy responds by disputing our premise that the president is subject to federal bribery law. He writes that the bribery statute, 18 U.S.C. §201, “clearly does not apply to the president” because the statute applies only to “public officials” and the president and the vice president are not included in the statute’s list of public officials. Never mind that the definition of “public official” includes any “person acting for or on behalf of the United States.” Because the statute does not mention the president, McCarthy asserts, it does not apply to him. McCarthy, moreover, attributes all of this to “the Justice Department’s well-established position” on the subject.

In fact, the Justice Department’s position is the opposite. According to a 1995 Office of Legal Counsel opinion, “the Department of Justice has construed the federal bribery statute as applying to the President even though it does not expressly name the President.” Now, McCarthy might disagree with the Justice Department’s position, but that is indeed the Justice Department’s position.

Why does the Office Legal Counsel, an executive-branch office that takes a famously latitudinarian approach to presidential power, nonetheless reject the view that McCarthy takes? One clue is that McCarthy’s perspective, if taken seriously, would mean not only that the president could take a bribe without fear of criminal liability but also that anyone else could bribe the president without fear of criminal liability. That’s because the bribery statute applies to anyone who “corruptly gives, offers or promises anything of value to any public official … to influence any official act,” and to anyone who “being a public official … , corruptly demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to accept anything of value … in return for … being influenced in the performance of any official act.” So if—as McCarthy claims—the president and vice president are not “public officials,” bribing them would not be a crime. Why Congress would want to criminalize bribery of everyone else in the federal government except for the No. 1 and No. 2 officials is a mystery that McCarthy does not seek to solve.

Daily Bread for 12.27.18

Good morning.

Thursday in Whitewater will be rainy with a high of forty-seven.  Sunrise is 7:24 AM and sunset 4:27 PM, for 9h 03m 15s of daytime.  The moon is a waning gibbous with 69.8% of its visible disk illuminated.

On this day in 1900, Carrie (Carry) Nation smashes a Witicha, Kansas bar in one of her many hatchetations:

a hatchet-wielding Carrie Nation brought her campaign against alcohol to Wichita, Kansas, where she damaged the bar at the elegant Carey Hotel. Since the Kansas Constitution prohibited the purchase of alcohol, Nation argued that destroying saloons was an acceptable means of battling the state’s thriving liquor trade.

Recommended for reading in full:

  Anna Nemtsova writes The Putin Regime is Forcing Russia’s Best and Brightest Into Exile:

Outspoken critics of the Kremlin’s policy are aware of the risks they run. Every week Russian authorities order the arrests of activists. On Sunday, police detained 12 people protesting outside the Federal Security Service (FSB) headquarters against abuses of power. One of the activists was holding a banner, which said: “Putin, leave Ukraine alone, nobody wants the war.”

In 2015 a group of assassins gunned down the man at the heart of the Russian opposition, ex-vice prime minister Boris Nemtsov, right by the Kremlin wall. It was a demonstrative gesture: the criminals showed that no federal security service was there to protect the leading critic of President Putin.

Every year thousands march in Nemtsov’s memory all over the country. Earlier this year, the city of Washington D.C. renamed the street outside the Russian embassy Boris Nemtsov Plaza.

Since 2014, the year Russia took Crimea from Ukraine and annexed it, Russia’s prominent cultural figures, writers, artists, gallery owners, musicians, film-makers, and journalists have been moving out. According to the latest study by the Russian Public Opinion Research Center, nearly every third young Russian wants to emigrate.

Ilya Arkhipov reports Russia Considers Constitution Changes as Putin Faces Term Limits:

The speaker of Russia’s parliament raised the possibility of changing the constitution as speculation grows that the Kremlin is considering ways to allow President Vladimir Putin to remain in power beyond the end of his current term, when current law requires him to step down.

“This is about the transfer of power,” said Gleb Pavlovsky, a political analyst and former Kremlin aide. “Putin encourages this game, dropping ambiguous hints.”

The comments from Vyacheslav Volodin, speaker of the State Duma and a top member of the ruling party, at a scripted Kremlin meeting with Putin late Tuesday were vague and didn’t mention succession. But analysts said they showed the authorities already are preparing the ground for changes before the end of Putin’s current term in 2024.

How a Stick Insect Walks: